In post 290, Aloratom wrote:Bob told me to get a life. I thought that was funny. And appropriate.
As far as my scum meta goes, he may be right. I don't know.
There's not much of a sample to work with there.
Shouldn't you of all people know your own meta?
Bob apparently thinks that as scum I do certain things. I don't know if he's right. I can't have but one scum game with him. I'd have to re-read that game to see if I agree with Bob.
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2020 3:50 am
by Aloratom
In post 293, Hectic wrote:Did he? I got the impression he was questioning whether or not you were joking.
I think there was subtext there.
How about asking me about someone other than Bob? As cool a cat Bob is, I feel the bad guys are running under the radar.
In post 276, Wake1 wrote:I don't recall getting an answer from Aloratom.
VOTE: Aloratom
What makes you think Alo not answering the question is a scum move?
I don't know whether it makes Hectic town or scum that he ignored my comment about him not inspiring confidence.
Evading a question, to me, is not Townish whatsoever.
It's Scummy behavior.
In a lot of situations yeah but aren't there also situations where it's just certain people's playstyles to avoid questions? I'm thinking like a RC-type player. What makes Alo's evasion scum here?
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2020 4:14 am
by SirCakez
Wake vs Alo may be TvS
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2020 4:29 am
by Morning Tweet
I think the case against Alo is not built very strong, but I don't think that in itself is scum indictative. Especially when that's in line with Wake making aggressive pushes
i still want to hear more about 304
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2020 5:13 am
by davesaz
I like how this is "Wake's push" but I'm the one who stated a potential scum motivation to Aloratom's actions (and Bob's reactions).
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2020 5:33 am
by Hectic
In post 328, Aloratom wrote:How about asking me about someone other than Bob? As cool a cat Bob is, I feel the bad guys are running under the radar.
Alright. If you had to vig shoot and protect in {Gamma Emerald, tictac, profii} tonight, who would your targets be, and why?
One more thing: Have you ever been in a private topic with Bobman before?
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2020 5:39 am
by Hectic
tictac
, do you agree with this consensus of Waka Waka town? Do you think anyone townreading him at the moment is doing so to go along with the flow/majority?
Gamma Emerald
, anyone you want to lock up yet? Or perhaps just refer to the Criminal Investigation Department?
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2020 5:43 am
by SirCakez
In post 334, Hectic wrote:do you agree with this consensus of Waka Waka town?
Why? I still don't understand how these reads work btw, do you feel S is more likely to be one side, or you just get the feeling their interactions are scummy in some way?
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2020 6:01 am
by Hectic
In post 299, profii wrote:Hectic do you sense that the alo vs wake debate will conclude in some alignment indicative clues (those 2 players or otherwise)
It seems like much ado about nothing which is ultimately a distraction
In post 307, profii wrote:Hectic... nah, I meant alo and wake... see above
Oh. Absolutely not lol. I'd step in but I was told off earlier for answering a question not directed at me. Do you think Wake's persistence is genuine?
In post 307, profii wrote:Hectic... nah, I meant alo and wake... see above
Oh. Absolutely not lol. I'd step in but I was told off earlier for answering a question not directed at me. Do you think Wake's persistence is genuine?
Not particularly
Actually changed my mind. The first time I played with wake I found his seemingly exaggerated persistence annoying
It came from a place of town and it's happening again I think.
I thought your first post was signifying you don't expect the interaction to yield anything alignment-indicative. But then you suggest you don't buy Wake's push in the second, and that you do and that it's town-indicative in the third.
I'm more interested to hear you progression between the first and second post though.
Why? I still don't understand how these reads work btw, do you feel S is more likely to be one side, or you just get the feeling their interactions are scummy in some way?
The latter. Sometimes there's more reasoning for it but it's too early here.
, do you agree with this consensus of Waka Waka town? Do you think anyone townreading him at the moment is doing so to go along with the flow/majority?
Gamma Emerald
, anyone you want to lock up yet? Or perhaps just refer to the Criminal Investigation Department?
Tbh the way you’re engaging with me is weird with these softball questions while having me at the bottom of your reads
What are you getting out of this?
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2020 8:27 am
by Hectic
The reason I have you bottom of my reads is because the stances you've taken thus far are easy and ones taken by a few others already (dave and Wake town). I want to hear more reasoning/independent thoughts from you, which is why I'm asking if your Eyes of Misgiving are pointing anywhere yet.
In post 299, profii wrote:Hectic do you sense that the alo vs wake debate will conclude in some alignment indicative clues (those 2 players or otherwise)
It seems like much ado about nothing which is ultimately a distraction
In post 307, profii wrote:Hectic... nah, I meant alo and wake... see above
Oh. Absolutely not lol. I'd step in but I was told off earlier for answering a question not directed at me. Do you think Wake's persistence is genuine?
In post 307, profii wrote:Hectic... nah, I meant alo and wake... see above
Oh. Absolutely not lol. I'd step in but I was told off earlier for answering a question not directed at me. Do you think Wake's persistence is genuine?
Not particularly
Actually changed my mind. The first time I played with wake I found his seemingly exaggerated persistence annoying
It came from a place of town and it's happening again I think.
I thought your first post was signifying you don't expect the interaction to yield anything alignment-indicative. But then you suggest you don't buy Wake's push in the second, and that you do and that it's town-indicative in the third.
I'm more interested to hear you progression between the first and second post though.
My memory of my first game with Wake kicked in and I remembered the aggressive pushes. So that made me think the persistence actually is genuine and u changed my mind.
I'll have to reread alo again. I just played with alo and we were both scum but I wouldn't consider myself an expert but I'll take a look.
What have I've done to get near the top of this list?
Is the font size indicative of strength in read?
Will Jazz get married? Tune in next week?
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2020 10:59 am
by HoldenGolden
In post 331, Morning Tweet wrote:I think the case against Alo is not built very strong, but I don't think that in itself is scum indictative. Especially when that's in line with Wake making aggressive pushes
i still want to hear more about 304
What do you make about the point I brought up about Cake explaining the purpose of the protown statement before Alo's explanation and read over it?
