Mafiascum.net

I TL/TR these slots due to various reasons like tone/dependent on drew flip/townie intentions etc

Tanner/Persivul/Farside/Mavs/Una

These slots need sorting/null reads

Luca/salad/riabi

SLs

PD/GB

In post 324, PranaDevil wrote:@Knightmare

I've said elsewhere that I'm not voting Drew right now, but am happy to be the hammer. I do not wish to rush a lynch when there's information to gather. If you were doing a true ISO of me you would have seen that. So why did you deliberately omit it to try and make out I refuse to vote Drew?

That's not what I said.................................................................

In my post I'm talking about the time there were three votes on Drew and he hadn't claimed yet, I felt like you had enough reason to vote there but didn't. This is another misrepresentation/shade throw attempt from you.

2 scum reads? The PD scum read is a bit of a stretch.
Hi Red Panda. I swear I thought I recognized your name but I saw your join date. Are you an alt of someone? I don't care who, just curious.

In post 327, farside wrote:2 scum reads? The PD scum read is a bit of a stretch.
Hi Red Panda. I swear I thought I recognized your name but I saw your join date. Are you an alt of someone? I don't care who, just curious.

Seeing as reasons such as "lurking" are being thrown around to SR people and it being day 1, I think mine are decent observations.

In post 327, farside wrote:Hi Red Panda. I swear I thought I recognized your name but I saw your join date. Are you an alt of someone? I don't care who, just curious.

Yes. Also congrats on getting your old acct back or finding out the password.


So I'm currently on page 6 of a read thru. We have 2 miller claims. And an IC but the Millers didn't know of each other. Maybe that's how it passed a normal but even then it doesn't make much sense to me unless they don't know of each other is how it became far. The joys of normal's.
Right now I have Tanner as a top Scum read and without looking for a VC that is where my vote would be at the moment.

Drew comes at me a bit weird for how the claim came about. Almost as if they wanted to put themselves up for the block.

So far I don't like George at all either in this game.

Una brought up a good point about the IC But even on that note I'm not sure I felt it this in. I got a town feel from it. Note this is 4-6 pages in and later today Ill have some thoughtful reads and where I stand with a lot of people.

Why would you assume Millers would know of each other?

Just skimming through, about half way.

Tanner is my biggest (non conf) TR atm.

TL on Farside. Prana and Una fall below the null line.

Mavs' claim seems more believable than Drew's.

I'll finish my catch-up and post my thoughts, probably in about 12 hours or so.

@red: micc helped me sort my old account issue.
Why is george coming across as weird?

Note I'm answering this 4-6 pages in. But the push to L-2 just seemed to rub me the wrong way. And I don't see people wanting to jump on the wagon like that even claiming it was L-2.

Luca I agree with that one on the claim from Mav seems better.

[quote]Why would you assume Millers would know of each other?[/qupte]
Maybe I'm just a bit crazy I'm used to games where Masons are aware of each other but then again this is a normal as well. Then again I could be completely off base in thinking they would know each other in the interest of fairness.

Thanks

In post 334, Red Panda wrote:

Why would you assume Millers would know of each other?

Maybe I'm just a bit crazy I'm used to games where Masons are aware of each other but then again this is a normal as well. Then again I could be completely off base in thinking they would know each other in the interest of fairness.

BRUH

Dude it's millers, not masons.

Town person who investigates as scum to a cop.

I'm sorry I just can't

miller=mason

Funny moment of the year?

In post 338, Persivul wrote:Town person who investigates as scum to a cop.

Throw what I said out then. I really just reversed the roles in my head.

Yeah nevermind then. A lynch of those two wouldn't help town at all though and just does no favors.

Either way I'll have more thoughts later.

And on that note don't they also flip scum when lynched or am I off base with this one as well?

So Thanks for clearing up my brain process.

In post 340, Red Panda wrote:And on that note don't they also flip scum when lynched or am I off base with this one as well?

That is called a Death Miller. They're explicitly not Normal. A Town Miller will flip as Town Miller.

In post 340, Red Panda wrote:Yeah nevermind then. A lynch of those two wouldn't help town at all though and just does no favors.

Point is that many of us agree that a mini normal is extremely unlikely to have two millers, so the first was a fakeclaim.

In post 79, Drew-Sta wrote:I fully expect to be dead by day one. I do, however, intend to make sure my remaining time here is as profitable as possible.

This line just bothers me all around.

In post 136, Tanner wrote:If he saw votes building up on him, it's possible he thought of the claim as a way to escape the votes or if a scummate told him to (provided scum has an Encryptor).

Maybe I'm biased but this right here makes it seem that you are one who has an idea of some sort of setup here.

Right now I think we can learn a lot from a Drew lynch which I am all for.

Otherwise I'm looking at Tanner. Maybe I'm a bit crazy but I see Pers as more town. But I've known to be wrong before.

I don't think the conclusion of

(1) Millers should usually claim in their first post
(2) Drew started getting heat
(3) Drew only after that claimed Miller (and later got counterclaimed)
-> It's possible his partners saw him getting heat and had a fakeclaim idea

requires actual setup knowledge.

In post 343, Red Panda wrote:

In post 79, Drew-Sta wrote:I fully expect to be dead by day one. I do, however, intend to make sure my remaining time here is as profitable as possible.

This line just bothers me all around.

In post 136, Tanner wrote:If he saw votes building up on him, it's possible he thought of the claim as a way to escape the votes or if a scummate told him to (provided scum has an Encryptor).

Maybe I'm biased but this right here makes it seem that you are one who has an idea of some sort of setup here.

Right now I think we can learn a lot from a Drew lynch which I am all for.

Otherwise I'm looking at Tanner. Maybe I'm a bit crazy but I see Pers as more town. But I've known to be wrong before.

Why does drews post bother you?
How do you get to that conclusion based on tanners comment.

In post 255, mavsfan41 wrote:@George Bailey: your vote is on Saladman27. Say you get what you want and Saladman27 is lynched. And there is also a vig in the game. Who do you believe the vig should target during the night?

I don't actually want Saladman lynched, but I did want his slot to contribute at the time. It felt like people were trying to rush the day when there were people who were plain unreadable.

But in the case Salad WAS lynched, I would want Drew to get shot.

(Sorry, catching up now)

In post 318, Knightmare491 wrote:Another one I don't like is GB, refer 102 and 189, he hasn't responded to the latter.

The latter was more of a statement, and I haven't posted since then. Calling this out is just plain dishonest.

But to answer, just because it's a declaration doesn't mean it's not a reason??? Like their reason was to not let it get to L-2.

I don't understand why this is something to call out.

In post 215, Drew-Sta wrote:A person who is avoiding this issue. Yes.

This is kind of a weird attack on someone being V/LA.

Activity is almost never Alignment indicative.

In post 348, GeorgeBailey wrote:

In post 215, Drew-Sta wrote:A person who is avoiding this issue. Yes.

This is kind of a weird attack on someone being V/LA.

Activity is almost never Alignment indicative.

It seemed to be a good way to wash their hands of the issue. Someone later corrected me to tell me that this player is V/LA every weekend.

I own the mistake.