Posted: Mon May 18, 2020 2:11 pm
In post 318, Hoctac wrote:jus here fore teh hammre
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
In post 318, Hoctac wrote:jus here fore teh hammre
wait, hang onIn post 44, ManateeDude wrote:1. in real life? yes. in this game? sadly noIn post 41, midwaybear wrote:RQS Questions
1. Are you scum?
2. What are some of your recent games?
3. What is your favorite role?
1. Nope
2. Newbie 1997
3. Cop
2. I just came back from a year long hiatus from any mafia but I have one game offsite completed here since my break
3. Any spicy/flavoured roles.
In post 44, ManateeDude wrote:1. in real life? yes. in this game? sadly noIn post 41, midwaybear wrote:RQS Questions
1. Are you scum?
2. What are some of your recent games?
3. What is your favorite role?
1. Nope
2. Newbie 1997
3. Cop
2. I just came back from a year long hiatus from any mafia but I have one game offsite completed here since my break
3. Any spicy/flavoured roles.
In post 181, ManateeDude wrote:Regrettably not : (In post 180, votato wrote:are you scum?In post 179, ManateeDude wrote:Procrastinating from my schoolwork AMA
we should lynch manatee hereIn post 205, ManateeDude wrote:OH LMAO no I hate it. it stresses me out and I feel trapped :/In post 195, Hoctac wrote:nooo meaning i do you like playing scum?In post 190, ManateeDude wrote:I dont like the scum because umm they are very mean and quite likely have intent to eventually kill me, as a member of the town.In post 188, Hoctac wrote:do you like the scum? why?In post 181, ManateeDude wrote:Regrettably not : (In post 180, votato wrote:are you scum?In post 179, ManateeDude wrote:Procrastinating from my schoolwork AMA
was gonna say norway leans town but then they started going off word to go for farside for duuuuuummmbb reasons. i want to believe.In post 191, Madonna wrote:Only hit page 6 as of now, lamest thing I have seen thus far is the question @mod about post restriction roles being a thing. If they exist in a normal game, are they alignment indicative? Doubtful, unless you want to go way off base and assume out of several post restriction roles, some are town, some are scum, and that is now your voting pool. Like, that is wild.
I like norways push. I found bob way more scummier for his push. Those questions he asked were awful.In post 330, Nahdia wrote:was gonna say norway leans town but then they started going off word to go for farside for duuuuuummmbb reasons. i want to believe.In post 191, Madonna wrote:Only hit page 6 as of now, lamest thing I have seen thus far is the question @mod about post restriction roles being a thing. If they exist in a normal game, are they alignment indicative? Doubtful, unless you want to go way off base and assume out of several post restriction roles, some are town, some are scum, and that is now your voting pool. Like, that is wild.
hoctac how confident do u feel on manatee?
In post 329, Nahdia wrote:madonna wagon is also bad, 191 is fine and their vote is literally an RVS vote to run someone up. that's how RVS works.
In post 184, Madonna wrote:No vote count update since the initial? I will not be RVS voting, it seems, since by the time I catch up reading, I am going to have opinions.
Samsies, po7x.
hmm i don't knowIn post 329, Nahdia wrote:oh my god i disagree with everyone in this game about how theyre reading this! the manatee wagon is bad! contradictions like that arent a scum tell, why would that be scummy?
In post 182, Madonna wrote:Heya, it has been ages since I have played, have not looked at the the votes yet so give me a moment before making a crap RVS vote that is not an accidental hammer. Good work getting to page 8.
In post 184, Madonna wrote:No vote count update since the initial? I will not be RVS voting, it seems, since by the time I catch up reading, I am going to have opinions.
Samsies, po7x.
madonna's entrance to the game feels extremely belabored. after all the rigmarole, i was expecting at least a scumread. instead we get this.In post 191, Madonna wrote:Only hit page 6 as of now, lamest thing I have seen thus far is the question @mod about post restriction roles being a thing. If they exist in a normal game, are they alignment indicative? Doubtful, unless you want to go way off base and assume out of several post restriction roles, some are town, some are scum, and that is now your voting pool. Like, that is wild.
states word's question to the mod was "lame". i agree it was lame, not really scummy tho. if the question is so bad, why link a wiki page to answer it?In post 197, Madonna wrote:It turns out, eight pages of voting has not already put anyone in dire straits. We can fix that.
VOTE: word321
In post 201, Madonna wrote:word321: https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Normal_Game
Under Setup, the red bit about non-normal mechanics.
then he says this, seems quite sure of his vote on word, despite not really giving any reason. this is the damning post for me. getting on an early day 1 speedwagon? no problem. defending that speedwagon against another speedwagon for no reason? no noIn post 217, Madonna wrote:Less ManateeDude, more word321. I felt we were getting somewhere.
bad questions yes, scummy questions... kinda sorta not really? i guess i dont like the premise but vibe with the execution. idkfarside22 wrote:I like norways push. I found bob way more scummier for his push. Those questions he asked were awful.In post 330, Nahdia wrote:was gonna say norway leans town but then they started going off word to go for farside for duuuuuummmbb reasons. i want to believe.In post 191, Madonna wrote:Only hit page 6 as of now, lamest thing I have seen thus far is the question @mod about post restriction roles being a thing. If they exist in a normal game, are they alignment indicative? Doubtful, unless you want to go way off base and assume out of several post restriction roles, some are town, some are scum, and that is now your voting pool. Like, that is wild.
hoctac how confident do u feel on manatee?
oh cool i read that backwards.popopopopopopo wrote:In post 329, Nahdia wrote:madonna wagon is also bad, 191 is fine and their vote is literally an RVS vote to run someone up. that's how RVS works.In post 184, Madonna wrote:No vote count update since the initial? I will not be RVS voting, it seems, since by the time I catch up reading, I am going to have opinions.
Samsies, po7x.
oh. huh. that's actually not a bad angle. thought u were just pushing for the surface-level contradiction.Hoctac wrote:hmm i don't knowIn post 329, Nahdia wrote:oh my god i disagree with everyone in this game about how theyre reading this! the manatee wagon is bad! contradictions like that arent a scum tell, why would that be scummy?
i do think it's scum-indicative to pretend like you wish you'd rolled scum as scum though, when in reality you don't like it at all
In post 307, Albert B. Rampage wrote: I thought madonna's vote was pretty bad. Wanna lynch her?
In post 308, popopopopopopo wrote:ok lol, i just checked the ISO and im actually fine with this
vote:madonna
do you have any readsIn post 337, Madonna wrote:I feel like you guys are going to spend a lot of time fighting about a few posts by me that indicate nothing. The quick answer to everything is: we should focus on somebody, yes, and yes, that can be if you would like, and yes, I think that being the third? wagon suggests that none of you seem to want to anchor your votes much for long.
Why not word321? Why not ManateeDude? I like keeping votes still because you get to draw information from the people not on board with the primary wagon. Is word321/ManateeDude/Madonna so-and-so's scummate? You could find out if you stopped a moment and let that pressure build, even let it get to L-1. Then people drop off, find different scumspects, and things evaporate, and that has even happened here without L-1 wagons, but with less results.
Same explanation :/ I meant it in a "haha not this time" wayIn post 326, Hoctac wrote:wait, hang onIn post 44, ManateeDude wrote:1. in real life? yes. in this game? sadly noIn post 41, midwaybear wrote:RQS Questions
1. Are you scum?
2. What are some of your recent games?
3. What is your favorite role?
1. Nope
2. Newbie 1997
3. Cop
2. I just came back from a year long hiatus from any mafia but I have one game offsite completed here since my break
3. Any spicy/flavoured roles.
you even said "sadly no" here. why?
Leaning town on ManateeDude and NorwegianBoyEE, enjoying their style, leaning scum on word321 and Albert B. Rampage, one with the sudden OMGUS turnabout and the other one was in both jumps on word321 and me. I was seriously digging your play prior to my entrance, popopopopopopo, but I guess what worked for you against word321 worked against me, and that is acceptably null.In post 338, popopopopopopo wrote: do you have any reads
Why is that word post bad?In post 185, Nahdia wrote:yikers a bad post in reference to a bad post. scumception.In post 172, word321 wrote:This is both "gratuitous" and was umprompted; theres no reason to do this as scum, and constitutes my first somewhat serious tl.In post 162, midwaybear wrote:yeah sure
however, I am a bit cautious. I don't really see anything too out of the blue with word's current posts compared to his standard town meta
idk bc that's a fuckingwildpost if they're both mafia but i sure do hate them both!
game is strange. normally i feel like im townreading too many people and have to adjust, now i feel like im scumreading too many people. who would like to be part of the townbloc? apply now.
VOTE: word321
Why is it dumb reasoning? Are you good at reading Farside and do they seem like town to you?In post 330, Nahdia wrote:was gonna say norway leans town but then they started going off word to go for farside for duuuuuummmbb reasons. i want to believe.In post 191, Madonna wrote:Only hit page 6 as of now, lamest thing I have seen thus far is the question @mod about post restriction roles being a thing. If they exist in a normal game, are they alignment indicative? Doubtful, unless you want to go way off base and assume out of several post restriction roles, some are town, some are scum, and that is now your voting pool. Like, that is wild.
hoctac how confident do u feel on manatee?
ur tunneling hard, think about it. if he has done this more than once then its not a slip up and his explanation makes more sense because its how he talksIn post 327, Hoctac wrote: we should lynch manatee here
once? ok maybe i can buy his explanation. but twice? i dunno m8
Your mindset sucks.In post 323, Albert B. Rampage wrote:We had a solid bandwagon on word, and a competing miniwagon with manatee. I think that's sufficient information for day 2, all considered.
I'm just tired of 80 page day 1s where every town role is outted and scum can pick the PRs apart...….every damn time.