Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2020 7:05 pm
why are they townposts tho
why are they townposts tho
aren't you like, voting gerain...In post 326, VP Baltar wrote:Bad thing about no daytalk is that scum are just gonna spaghetti all over themselves trying to stop their buddies from eating a yeet.
Shelly, if you're town, I'd prolly stop trying to save geraintm bc it's going to look bad when he flips red
I haven't felt pushed at all.In post 323, shellyc wrote:personal attack vs. solving my alignment when I'm pushing youIn post 318, VP Baltar wrote:SEEMS LIKE UR FULL OF SHIT
hmmmmmm
HURT: VPBaltar
Literally have no idea what you're even trying to say here, but I don't think it means what you think it means.In post 329, shellyc wrote:oh and preflip assoc #2
you're "saving" gerain yet confident in him flipping red which is weird
You should vote him then and prove me wrong with a flipIn post 331, shellyc wrote:oh wait i misunderstood that
you're telling me to stop saving gerain
gerain's iso is basically the same as all the other lurker isos, i completely don't get this cw at all
confidence in scumflip when we're 48 hours into d1 cant plausibly come from town imo
towny reaction to ur shitpush
ur confident in vp/math thoIn post 331, shellyc wrote:oh wait i misunderstood that
you're telling me to stop saving gerain
gerain's iso is basically the same as all the other lurker isos, i completely don't get this cw at all
confidence in scumflip when we're 48 hours into d1 cant plausibly come from town imo
my math vote is pressure-ish vote? and I've clearly explained the trajectories behind why i SR them, and vp hasn't done soIn post 335, DkKoba wrote:ur confident in vp/math tho
info flipping is one of the easiest ways for scum to get free miselimsIn post 333, VP Baltar wrote:You should vote him then and prove me wrong with a flip
THANK YOU PROFESSOR MAFIAIn post 337, shellyc wrote:info flipping is one of the easiest ways for scum to get free miselimsIn post 333, VP Baltar wrote:You should vote him then and prove me wrong with a flip
Asking for reasons for a vote when you haven't given any is objectively pro-town play.In post 303, VP Baltar wrote:Gonna let infiinity/shelly/jackson keep scumming it up in this thread. One is probably dumb town though. because geraintm is still scum.
Whoever it was that asked me for a reason to vote geraintm is a very likely buddy. Might have been shelly, but I'm semi-drunk and too lazy too go back.
Ok you've given reasons but they're not nearly sufficient to warrant your level of confidence.In post 225, VP Baltar wrote:You basically said you were annoyed people were posting too much and offered nothing of substance yourself. Not sure why you're acting angry about people posting.In post 220, geraintm wrote:Hot how?
Plus, there ARE things to comment on. Shelly for instance
In post 339, Infinity 324 wrote:Asking for reasons for a vote when you haven't given any is objectively pro-town play.In post 303, VP Baltar wrote:Gonna let infiinity/shelly/jackson keep scumming it up in this thread. One is probably dumb town though. because geraintm is still scum.
Whoever it was that asked me for a reason to vote geraintm is a very likely buddy. Might have been shelly, but I'm semi-drunk and too lazy too go back.
lol?In post 340, Infinity 324 wrote:Ok you've given reasons but they're not nearly sufficient to warrant your level of confidence.In post 225, VP Baltar wrote:You basically said you were annoyed people were posting too much and offered nothing of substance yourself. Not sure why you're acting angry about people posting.In post 220, geraintm wrote:Hot how?
Plus, there ARE things to comment on. Shelly for instance
I am amused that people find my method of generating a random vote, which i have done in many previous games including games which people in this have been in, has caused such a fuss.In post 256, shellyc wrote:the gerain wagon seems to be of someone whos low activity + made a weird maths thingy in rvs
don't get how that is scummy at all
this is a trash cw
Don't stop believingIn post 344, Infinity 324 wrote:I still feel pretty justified in asking for reasons. 225 barely counts.
In post 254, shellyc wrote:sup whats the gerain wagon all about
catching up now
btw the andres SR was kinda a meme so UNVOTE: Andres
In post 331, shellyc wrote:oh wait i misunderstood that
you're telling me to stop saving gerain
gerain's iso is basically the same as all the other lurker isos, i completely don't get this cw at all
confidence in scumflip when we're 48 hours into d1 cant plausibly come from town imo
I'm not gonna speak for others who find him scummy (still have not seen a justification from VP for his vote and would like to see one) but its the following from me:In post 346, geraintm wrote:I am amused that people find my method of generating a random vote, which i have done in many previous games including games which people in this have been in, has caused such a fuss.In post 256, shellyc wrote:the gerain wagon seems to be of someone whos low activity + made a weird maths thingy in rvs
don't get how that is scummy at all
this is a trash cw
I vote whomever posts that many number posts after mine
The jokey brush-off of the suspicion rather than engaging more meaningfully is a classic deflection move. Furthermore, have not had anything meaningful from the slot since in terms of content/analysis/reads so that's why my vote went there and is still very happily there.In post 105, geraintm wrote:Why? Are you jealous of my addition abilities?In post 73, Andresvmb wrote:In post 36, NDMath wrote:VOTE: shelleyc
<'Englishes'. Math is sometimes considered a language, and one doesn't pluralize languages.>In post 33, Marky Mark wrote:VOTE: NDMath
<insert hilarious quip here about the moral and grammatical superiority of British English 'maths' to the Americanism of 'math'>
Probably. 7*7-7=42In post 35, JacksonVirgo wrote:Is this a soft?In post 34, geraintm wrote:Hello all. I can do maths. 2+1+7+3=13I would eliminate this slot if all I had was the information we have right now.In post 34, geraintm wrote:Hello all. I can do maths. 2+1+7+3=13
I don't think you ever did explain this - yes, you've mentioned the "scumclaim" in #296 but that was way after this post so clearly not the original reason for the post.In post 248, DkKoba wrote:VOTE: jackson ill explain in a bit when i can type it up. I believe i hinted at this move earlier but i was hoping to see more info before i transitioned over