Page 14 of 263

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:15 am
by Annie Edison
COBRA KAI

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:15 am
by Snarky Fishes
In post 283, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 269, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 258, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 257, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 99, Dunnstral wrote:I didn't realize that scum had an alternative win condition.

I still think we should consider powering somebody up, but don't think we should hand it out randomly.
Does this mean that your hurt vote was not random? Can you explain it then?
That's not what it means but it also isn't random. I wanted to give it to a hydra that could become more readable and decided on them or the fish hydra
Why hydras? Why those 2 hydras, when we have 4?
I think hydras are more readable and those two would be more readable with positive pressure™ than the other two
I feel like you're underestimating Ceph's scum game.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:16 am
by Lukewarm
In post 321, Medea the Alien wrote:Do you think Dunn is a player inclined to be led around by the nose? And why the jump to characterizing a request for another player's read on a third person as outsourcing then? Given that he also doesn't feel good about us, I'm hardly likely to take him as gospel.

--PA
You are thinking about it backwards.

270 is structured as "dunn talk to me about Lukewarm" followed by weak reasons you might be concerned about me. Vague suspicions without actually saying that you thought I was leaning scum or anything.

Given that structure, it looks like you are either

1) Suspicious of me, and are looking to Dunn to confirm your suspicions (ie outsourceing the read) or

2) Trying to help build up dunn's scum read, so he would push it more.

I don't think that you or cabd would ever do 1, which left me suspicious that it was 2

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:17 am
by Lukewarm
Oh, and VOTE: Medea

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:17 am
by Snarky Fishes
In post 327, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 321, Medea the Alien wrote:Do you think Dunn is a player inclined to be led around by the nose? And why the jump to characterizing a request for another player's read on a third person as outsourcing then? Given that he also doesn't feel good about us, I'm hardly likely to take him as gospel.

--PA
You are thinking about it backwards.

270 is structured as "dunn talk to me about Lukewarm" followed by weak reasons you might be concerned about me. Vague suspicions without actually saying that you thought I was leaning scum or anything.

Given that structure, it looks like you are either

1) Suspicious of me, and are looking to Dunn to confirm your suspicions (ie outsourceing the read) or

2) Trying to help build up dunn's scum read, so he would push it more.

I don't think that you or cabd would ever do 1, which left me suspicious that it was 2
There's a third way.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:19 am
by Lukewarm
In post 329, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 327, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 321, Medea the Alien wrote:Do you think Dunn is a player inclined to be led around by the nose? And why the jump to characterizing a request for another player's read on a third person as outsourcing then? Given that he also doesn't feel good about us, I'm hardly likely to take him as gospel.

--PA
You are thinking about it backwards.

270 is structured as "dunn talk to me about Lukewarm" followed by weak reasons you might be concerned about me. Vague suspicions without actually saying that you thought I was leaning scum or anything.

Given that structure, it looks like you are either

1) Suspicious of me, and are looking to Dunn to confirm your suspicions (ie outsourceing the read) or

2) Trying to help build up dunn's scum read, so he would push it more.

I don't think that you or cabd would ever do 1, which left me suspicious that it was 2
There's a third way.
which is?

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:20 am
by Snarky Fishes
In post 330, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 329, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 327, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 321, Medea the Alien wrote:Do you think Dunn is a player inclined to be led around by the nose? And why the jump to characterizing a request for another player's read on a third person as outsourcing then? Given that he also doesn't feel good about us, I'm hardly likely to take him as gospel.

--PA
You are thinking about it backwards.

270 is structured as "dunn talk to me about Lukewarm" followed by weak reasons you might be concerned about me. Vague suspicions without actually saying that you thought I was leaning scum or anything.

Given that structure, it looks like you are either

1) Suspicious of me, and are looking to Dunn to confirm your suspicions (ie outsourceing the read) or

2) Trying to help build up dunn's scum read, so he would push it more.

I don't think that you or cabd would ever do 1, which left me suspicious that it was 2
There's a third way.
which is?
I'll answer this in a few pages.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:20 am
by ManateeGal
In post 324, Annie Edison wrote:Is it a proximity thing with sleez or something else? Because I felt like the brusqueness was more likely to come from town. And just like that confidence right out of the gate felt fairly town.
hmmmm yea its probably the proximity thats changing my perception in regards 2 sleez. i'd agree w your analysis on a surface level

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:22 am
by Lukewarm
In post 331, Snarky Fishes wrote:I'll answer this in a few pages.
Is it a reason that would imply I should not be voting for them?

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:24 am
by Medea the Alien
That's L-2 on us btw, we ask that the next vote instead be phrased as intent to hammer instead for reasons that should become obvious.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:26 am
by Medea the Alien
In post 326, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 283, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 269, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 258, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 257, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 99, Dunnstral wrote:I didn't realize that scum had an alternative win condition.

I still think we should consider powering somebody up, but don't think we should hand it out randomly.
Does this mean that your hurt vote was not random? Can you explain it then?
That's not what it means but it also isn't random. I wanted to give it to a hydra that could become more readable and decided on them or the fish hydra
Why hydras? Why those 2 hydras, when we have 4?
I think hydras are more readable and those two would be more readable with positive pressure™ than the other two
I feel like you're underestimating Ceph's scum game.
Ironic given Tenet.

I'm back, Costco didn't have my standing desk so card table slumlord it is until I can order it online for delivery.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:27 am
by Snarky Fishes
Medea the Alien wrote:That's L-2 on us btw, we ask that the next vote instead be phrased as intent to hammer instead for reasons that should become obvious.
interesting

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:28 am
by Snarky Fishes
In post 333, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 331, Snarky Fishes wrote:I'll answer this in a few pages.
Is it a reason that would imply I should not be voting for them?
I dunno.

I'm in data acquisition mode.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:30 am
by Annie Edison
I feel like I have too many townreads.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:30 am
by Lukewarm
UNVOTE:

I am not ready for a cobra kai

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:31 am
by Medea the Alien
In post 337, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 333, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 331, Snarky Fishes wrote:I'll answer this in a few pages.
Is it a reason that would imply I should not be voting for them?
I dunno.

I'm in data acquisition mode.
I'm not really sure what more data than wifewife literally role claiming to you and only you you expect to get out of us?

She liked the dancing with you though.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:31 am
by Annie Edison
I was tempted to be honest.

But I’m going to carry this game the right way.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:32 am
by Snarky Fishes
In post 340, Medea the Alien wrote:
In post 337, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 333, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 331, Snarky Fishes wrote:I'll answer this in a few pages.
Is it a reason that would imply I should not be voting for them?
I dunno.

I'm in data acquisition mode.
I'm not really sure what more data than wifewife literally role claiming to you and only you you expect to get out of us?

She liked the dancing with you though.
You're not the only data source.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:33 am
by Snarky Fishes
Am I correct in thinking 334 is a Cabd post?

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:33 am
by Medea the Alien
In post 341, Annie Edison wrote:I was tempted to be honest.

But I’m going to carry this game the right way.
I guess I'm just confused at the game state, at the risk of making penguin have "hypocrite" to write over me in marker next time I nap....

You're scum reading medea.

You're hard town reading fferybirbs.

Yet.... you're wondering if BULGE saw the thing about me, as opposed to shouting from the rooftops that you got scum cabd before ffery did, suck it universe?

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:34 am
by Medea the Alien
In post 343, Snarky Fishes wrote:Am I correct in thinking 334 is a Cabd post?
She's singing. Anything not signed is indeed me-cabd.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:34 am
by Annie Edison
Mylo, Cabd.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:37 am
by Medea the Alien
As in the Nacho thing?

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:39 am
by Annie Edison
Yes.

I’m scumreading you but worried I’m just being cocky and it’s why I’m waiting for bulge, because in tenet when I was scumreading you and I’d show him posts when he was no longer really playing but he’d still agree with me. Like yes, ffery seeing it too helps some as well

Also because I cobra kai hammered both days of tarot without him and I want us to have an actual hydra game lol

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:43 am
by Medea the Alien
In post 348, Annie Edison wrote:Like yes, ffery seeing it too helps some as well
I'd bet my secondborn that she's in data acquisition mode but has already made up her mind on the primary read of us.