Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:15 am
COBRA KAI
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
I feel like you're underestimating Ceph's scum game.In post 283, Dunnstral wrote:I think hydras are more readable and those two would be more readable with positive pressure™ than the other twoIn post 269, Lukewarm wrote:Why hydras? Why those 2 hydras, when we have 4?In post 258, Dunnstral wrote:That's not what it means but it also isn't random. I wanted to give it to a hydra that could become more readable and decided on them or the fish hydraIn post 257, Lukewarm wrote:Does this mean that your hurt vote was not random? Can you explain it then?In post 99, Dunnstral wrote:I didn't realize that scum had an alternative win condition.
I still think we should consider powering somebody up, but don't think we should hand it out randomly.
You are thinking about it backwards.In post 321, Medea the Alien wrote:Do you think Dunn is a player inclined to be led around by the nose? And why the jump to characterizing a request for another player's read on a third person as outsourcing then? Given that he also doesn't feel good about us, I'm hardly likely to take him as gospel.
--PA
There's a third way.In post 327, Lukewarm wrote:You are thinking about it backwards.In post 321, Medea the Alien wrote:Do you think Dunn is a player inclined to be led around by the nose? And why the jump to characterizing a request for another player's read on a third person as outsourcing then? Given that he also doesn't feel good about us, I'm hardly likely to take him as gospel.
--PA
270 is structured as "dunn talk to me about Lukewarm" followed by weak reasons you might be concerned about me. Vague suspicions without actually saying that you thought I was leaning scum or anything.
Given that structure, it looks like you are either
1) Suspicious of me, and are looking to Dunn to confirm your suspicions (ie outsourceing the read) or
2) Trying to help build up dunn's scum read, so he would push it more.
I don't think that you or cabd would ever do 1, which left me suspicious that it was 2
which is?In post 329, Snarky Fishes wrote:There's a third way.In post 327, Lukewarm wrote:You are thinking about it backwards.In post 321, Medea the Alien wrote:Do you think Dunn is a player inclined to be led around by the nose? And why the jump to characterizing a request for another player's read on a third person as outsourcing then? Given that he also doesn't feel good about us, I'm hardly likely to take him as gospel.
--PA
270 is structured as "dunn talk to me about Lukewarm" followed by weak reasons you might be concerned about me. Vague suspicions without actually saying that you thought I was leaning scum or anything.
Given that structure, it looks like you are either
1) Suspicious of me, and are looking to Dunn to confirm your suspicions (ie outsourceing the read) or
2) Trying to help build up dunn's scum read, so he would push it more.
I don't think that you or cabd would ever do 1, which left me suspicious that it was 2
I'll answer this in a few pages.In post 330, Lukewarm wrote:which is?In post 329, Snarky Fishes wrote:There's a third way.In post 327, Lukewarm wrote:You are thinking about it backwards.In post 321, Medea the Alien wrote:Do you think Dunn is a player inclined to be led around by the nose? And why the jump to characterizing a request for another player's read on a third person as outsourcing then? Given that he also doesn't feel good about us, I'm hardly likely to take him as gospel.
--PA
270 is structured as "dunn talk to me about Lukewarm" followed by weak reasons you might be concerned about me. Vague suspicions without actually saying that you thought I was leaning scum or anything.
Given that structure, it looks like you are either
1) Suspicious of me, and are looking to Dunn to confirm your suspicions (ie outsourceing the read) or
2) Trying to help build up dunn's scum read, so he would push it more.
I don't think that you or cabd would ever do 1, which left me suspicious that it was 2
hmmmm yea its probably the proximity thats changing my perception in regards 2 sleez. i'd agree w your analysis on a surface levelIn post 324, Annie Edison wrote:Is it a proximity thing with sleez or something else? Because I felt like the brusqueness was more likely to come from town. And just like that confidence right out of the gate felt fairly town.
Is it a reason that would imply I should not be voting for them?In post 331, Snarky Fishes wrote:I'll answer this in a few pages.
Ironic given Tenet.In post 326, Snarky Fishes wrote:I feel like you're underestimating Ceph's scum game.In post 283, Dunnstral wrote:I think hydras are more readable and those two would be more readable with positive pressure™ than the other twoIn post 269, Lukewarm wrote:Why hydras? Why those 2 hydras, when we have 4?In post 258, Dunnstral wrote:That's not what it means but it also isn't random. I wanted to give it to a hydra that could become more readable and decided on them or the fish hydraIn post 257, Lukewarm wrote:Does this mean that your hurt vote was not random? Can you explain it then?In post 99, Dunnstral wrote:I didn't realize that scum had an alternative win condition.
I still think we should consider powering somebody up, but don't think we should hand it out randomly.
interestingMedea the Alien wrote:That's L-2 on us btw, we ask that the next vote instead be phrased as intent to hammer instead for reasons that should become obvious.
I dunno.In post 333, Lukewarm wrote:Is it a reason that would imply I should not be voting for them?In post 331, Snarky Fishes wrote:I'll answer this in a few pages.
I'm not really sure what more data than wifewife literally role claiming to you and only you you expect to get out of us?In post 337, Snarky Fishes wrote:I dunno.In post 333, Lukewarm wrote:Is it a reason that would imply I should not be voting for them?In post 331, Snarky Fishes wrote:I'll answer this in a few pages.
I'm in data acquisition mode.
You're not the only data source.In post 340, Medea the Alien wrote:I'm not really sure what more data than wifewife literally role claiming to you and only you you expect to get out of us?In post 337, Snarky Fishes wrote:I dunno.In post 333, Lukewarm wrote:Is it a reason that would imply I should not be voting for them?In post 331, Snarky Fishes wrote:I'll answer this in a few pages.
I'm in data acquisition mode.
She liked the dancing with you though.
I guess I'm just confused at the game state, at the risk of making penguin have "hypocrite" to write over me in marker next time I nap....In post 341, Annie Edison wrote:I was tempted to be honest.
But I’m going to carry this game the right way.
She's singing. Anything not signed is indeed me-cabd.In post 343, Snarky Fishes wrote:Am I correct in thinking 334 is a Cabd post?
I'd bet my secondborn that she's in data acquisition mode but has already made up her mind on the primary read of us.In post 348, Annie Edison wrote:Like yes, ffery seeing it too helps some as well