In post 185, Kilgamayan wrote:Good to know this thread has already peaked with 91. It's all downhill from here!
UNVOTE: Gamma Emerald VOTE: Sanae
There's been far too much fluff RP nonsense in this thread. Would be willing to vote for Aaron as well, though I feel like Aaron is at least making slightly more of an effort to actually play the game (Note: Jester talk does not count as effort to play the game) despite the very low content.
I'm guessing Yukari's SDM-specific ire is based on SDM member behavior in past FakeGod Touhou UPicks, but I could be wrong.
do you think the RP is AI?
I think the phrasing of that question is a bit of an oversimplification of the situation.
To me, the RP not only contributes nothing meaningful, it pulls the thread in the wrong direction. RVS is Silliness Central, sure, but RP does nothing to help us get out of that into serious times, and once some people have moved into serious times, continuing the RP serves to try to drag the thread back toward unhelpful silliness. Unhelpful silliness is bad for town and good for mafia, ergo my opinions and vote.
I don't understand what you're getting at
Obviously you think the RP is not good for the thread state
But like..do you think scum are doing it intentionally?
Oh, that was directed at me? Right now, not much. We have a Hydra, so maybe I'll wait until the other person gets on. I think Town already outted too many roles. I don't have the motivation atm but I'll ISO Norwee and see what I think then.
also this is ridiculous - literally one person claimed
VOTE: Reg
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2021 3:55 am
by RegRider
I don't have time to formally address your post Cakez but both LLD and Norwee claimed.
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2021 4:05 am
by NorwegianboyEE
LLD not having a vote is something that could be clearly seen by anyone, and they didn't claim anything other than that.
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2021 4:07 am
by RegRider
In post 328, NorwegianboyEE wrote:LLD not having a vote is something that could be clearly seen by anyone, and they didn't claim anything other than that.
They also said something about being immortal. Even then, that's half a claim at least.
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2021 4:23 am
by Yukari Yakumo
In post 326, SirCakez wrote:also this is ridiculous - literally one person claimed
Is that the one you found the most concerning about that post?
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2021 4:36 am
by Titus
In post 274, Titus wrote:@RegRider I like you. I'd like to skim a prior game of yours to check your tone.
Oh, that was directed at me? Right now, not much. We have a Hydra, so maybe I'll wait until the other person gets on. I think Town already outted too many roles. I don't have the motivation atm but I'll ISO Norwee and see what I think then.
also this is ridiculous - literally one person claimed
VOTE: Reg
Not sure I disagree with this. If Reg ignores me again, you have my vote.
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2021 4:38 am
by Yukari Yakumo
Titus can you locate a problem in Reg’s 283? I personally think it’s a pretty big one.
In post 274, Titus wrote:@RegRider I like you. I'd like to skim a prior game of yours to check your tone.
The only game I played on this site is ongoing. I assumed you could just look in my post history. Not sure what you are asking.
Offsite is fine
I don't give offsite information. Also, are you trying to get me modkilled?
Offsite completed games are fine to link to. Why won't you?
Why would asking for finished games get you modkilled?
Because I assumed you want me to slip and get me modkilled for that rule. I am sorry, but getting offsite games is an unreasonable request. Its not because of a MS rule, its an internet safety thing.
In post 274, Titus wrote:@RegRider I like you. I'd like to skim a prior game of yours to check your tone.
The only game I played on this site is ongoing. I assumed you could just look in my post history. Not sure what you are asking.
Offsite is fine
I don't give offsite information. Also, are you trying to get me modkilled?
Offsite completed games are fine to link to. Why won't you?
Why would asking for finished games get you modkilled?
Because I assumed you want me to slip and get me modkilled for that rule. I am sorry, but getting offsite games is an unreasonable request. Its not because of a MS rule, its an internet safety thing.
I'm not asking for your real name or anything similar. No way you slip and get modkilled for sharing an offsite game.
In post 274, Titus wrote:@RegRider I like you. I'd like to skim a prior game of yours to check your tone.
The only game I played on this site is ongoing. I assumed you could just look in my post history. Not sure what you are asking.
Offsite is fine
I don't give offsite information. Also, are you trying to get me modkilled?
Offsite completed games are fine to link to. Why won't you?
Why would asking for finished games get you modkilled?
Because I assumed you want me to slip and get me modkilled for that rule. I am sorry, but getting offsite games is an unreasonable request. Its not because of a MS rule, its an internet safety thing.
I'm not asking for your real name or anything similar. No way you slip and get modkilled for sharing an offsite game.
Apparently you need bold to understand.
I will not share information from site to site if I can help it.
In post 333, Yukari Yakumo wrote:Titus can you locate a problem in Reg’s 283? I personally think it’s a pretty big one.
Two. One pointed out by SirCakez. The other is the suggestion "We have a hydra". There's an explaination for it but it's not good.
What about the part where he said he will ISO Norwee exclusively despite having him as the only townread in this game?
It's not like there weren't any good alternatives to ISO.
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2021 5:30 am
by Lukewarm
In post 337, RegRider wrote:
I don't give offsite information. Also, are you trying to get me modkilled?
I don't blame you for not wanting to share off site info.
However, Titus's line of questioning would never result in your being modkilled. (And I can't picture Titus or very many people at all, setting out with the goal of getting someone mod killed).
In like my 3rd or 4th game I accidentally quoted and used meta from a game that had not ended (the person I was looking into had flipped, and that is what I was looking for), and I got a warning.
At WORST you could be force replaced, but never mod killed.
In post 337, RegRider wrote:
I don't give offsite information. Also, are you trying to get me modkilled?
I don't blame you for not wanting to share off site info.
However, Titus's line of questioning would never result in your being modkilled. (And I can't picture Titus or very many people at all, setting out with the goal of getting someone mod killed).
In like my 3rd or 4th game I accidentally quoted and used meta from a game that had not ended (the person I was looking into had flipped, and that is what I was looking for), and I got a warning.
At WORST you could be force replaced, but never mod killed.
The problem lies with me thinking he was going to look through my post history on this site. If he wanted offsite games he should have mentioned that in the first place and we would have been done with this conversation.
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2021 5:40 am
by Lukewarm
I'm just letting you know that Titus, regardless of alignment, would never do what you just asked about. And wanted to let you know that that would never happen.
So, like, if that mad kill like is something you were still considering / worried about, letting you know it was a non issue.
You mean my ISO of you? I admit I haven't the motivation lately :/. Still gut townread you. I don't even remember why I wanted to ISO you in the first place.
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2021 6:14 am
by SirCakez
In post 327, RegRider wrote:I don't have time to formally address your post Cakez but both LLD and Norwee claimed.
Oh yeah I forgot about LLD's voteless
I'm not even sure you can call that a claim really because it was public information
