Mafiascum.net

Nu uh

I don't have much of a read on Kyo. I'm pointing out I said something similar to what you quoted about t3 TO Kyo and I wanted your opinion on that.

In post 294, T3 wrote:

In post 284, Roden wrote:Are you scum

not in particular

You're not really doing this again after FIA WRC?

In post 307, Roden wrote:Kyouko do you have any reads besides T3? Same for Mew, do you have any reads?

I'll have to reread in the morning. Very tired rn and just catching up. T3's posting is now reminding me of how he crumbed traitor in FIA WRC. Answering "not particularly" to "are you scum", and combining his claim that he is disconnected from the game with his commentary on rolling scum being draining feels the same as FIA WRC. He would make inane comments on a lot of things, and hidden in each of those comments was a subtle hint. It was painfully obvious to ManateeGal and I that he was our Traitor, then he went and faked a detective guilty on MG and the whole game fell apart.

Oh I just remembered this is the mewtaph game. I metad him recently, think I found a scumtell. Not present in his towngames and is present here at least.

Hence my vote and the "meta bad" comment

Oh, so it's a serious vote then. Alright.

There are a few players being cautious around locking in as town too early, T3 and Datisi. I think both are townier than not right now but that also just gives me pause.

I don't like ssbm_Kyouko's reasoning for their vote in their last post because trying to meta someone you haven't really played with doesn't really work. Or at least the meta read is going to be shallow as I know that it is wrong here. I know that you replaced into my scum slot but you haven't really engaged with me as players with me being scum and you being town so for you to call me on a scumtell is a little bit unsettling.

I don't understand Margot's scumread on me either. I wasn't exactly trying to do a galaxy brain play, just trying to move the game out of RVS. I'm not exactly sure what's to dislike about my posts directed to Salsabil Faria specifically. Is it because they come off as forced or something else entirely? I have no clue, just that they don't like my posts and that they don't like the AtE coming from my slot (which I don't really spot, but okay).

Of all the votes on me, ChaosOmega's vote makes the most sense to me and he has explained why he thinks my opening comes off poorly and I can see why. Overall though there's just not enough content in his ISO for me to feel comfortable giving him a solidified read. Similarly, Aristeia is in the same boat. Just not enough posts for me to feel comfortable giving a settled read on. Hopefully that changes by the end of the day.

In post 298, T3 wrote:This post is reading way too deep into stuff

yes
almost as if it was made halfway through page 1 of the game
what's the point of this comment

In post 312, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 286, Datisi wrote: i dislike salsa's 253. not always coming from scum (and there has been some stuff from salsa later on i liked) but the "you are scumreading both me and this person that i voted once in very early game?? in what universe can we possibly be scum together?!?" as if that vote actually meant anything or is any kind of anti-partner indicative lol

If the vote didn’t mean anything, they why did you vote

Mew

or a deep analysis of the vote? And later, you mostly probably said you were liking their reasoning behind it. So, you're reading them based on something that

actually meant nothing[/b] according to you?

MR

later said, it’s not SvS which I read that post later. I was surprised to see that she put both of us in the scum list which indicates scum!me and scum!

Mew

started the game by theatring which is ridiculous.

because i am aware that the "deep analysis" i make on page 1 about 2 posts is going to be meaningless soon. it's already meaningless now, i don't even remember what bullshit i said there. it's meant to get discussion going, but you can bet that once we're past the initial rvs stage, i'm not gonna be basing almost any of my read on mew on the analysis i made in 17.

later on, i said i liked his response. that's got nothing to do with his votes in the game, i thought his responses to my analysis and other people voting him were townie enough.

stop twisting my words. i didn't say that nothing mattered there, i said that your vote on mew will soon hold no significance whatsoever, or arguably already doesn't hold any significance whatsoever considering you're not even voting him anymore. so saying "me and mew cannot be scum because i voted him early game" is wrong and maybe purposefully ignorant. after thinking for 10 seconds, i can show you at least 2 games where scum entered the game theatering, probably more if i put any more brain into it.

and considering you're far from a newbie now, i'd expect you to know that scum very much can enter the game with throwaway votes on each other. so the fact that you're pretending that you voting mew somehow clears you from being partners is ridiculous, if not outright scummy.

In post 332, Mewtaph wrote:There are a few players being cautious around locking in as town too early, T3 and Datisi. I think both are townier than not right now but that also just gives me pause.

does this mean that you read us as town, but you're cautious about committing to the read? if so, what about us is giving you pause (and what do you find townie about t3?)? if that's not what you meant, can you rephrase?

votecount 1.4

Innocentvillager (3) :

Mewtaph ; Dwlee99 ; Datisi

Mewtaph (3) :

ChaosOmega ; MargotRosa ; ssbm_Kyouko

ssbm_Kyouko (2) :

T3 ; Salsabil Faria

T3 (1) :

Roden

MargotRosa (1) :

Datsi

Not_Mafia (1) :

Not_Mafia

Datsi (1) :

Aristeia

Not voting (1) :

innocentvillager

Day 1 ends in (expired on 2021-09-30 20:18:31) or when a wagon reaches majority at 7 votes

announcements

prodding innocentvillager

flavor

The smell of sulfur and gunpowder hangs in the air. The war machine is close.

lmao I forgot about this game oop

why are there 3 votes on me? u n a c c e p t a b l e !!

oh it’s the scumteam nvm ez gg

soo what’s going on guys anything interesting happen or nah

In post 331, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:

In post 307, Roden wrote:Kyouko do you have any reads besides T3? Same for Mew, do you have any reads?

I'll have to reread in the morning. Very tired rn and just catching up. T3's posting is now reminding me of how he crumbed traitor in FIA WRC. Answering "not particularly" to "are you scum", and combining his claim that he is disconnected from the game with his commentary on rolling scum being draining feels the same as FIA WRC. He would make inane comments on a lot of things, and hidden in each of those comments was a subtle hint. It was painfully obvious to ManateeGal and I that he was our Traitor, then he went and faked a detective guilty on MG and the whole game fell apart.

Oh I just remembered this is the mewtaph game. I metad him recently, think I found a scumtell. Not present in his towngames and is present here at least.

Hence my vote and the "meta bad" comment

Fair, I think this post probably comes from town.

In post 339, innocentvillager wrote:soo what’s going on guys anything interesting happen or nah

start reading the game and solving or i'm voting you out day 1

especially as you *just* did the "idk i don't feel like reading rn hehe" as scum

In post 329, Dwlee99 wrote:I don't have much of a read on Kyo. I'm pointing out I said something similar to what you quoted about t3 TO Kyo and I wanted your opinion on that.

In post 331, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:

In post 307, Roden wrote:Kyouko do you have any reads besides T3? Same for Mew, do you have any reads?

I'll have to reread in the morning. Very tired rn and just catching up. T3's posting is now reminding me of how he crumbed traitor in FIA WRC. Answering "not particularly" to "are you scum", and combining his claim that he is disconnected from the game with his commentary on rolling scum being draining feels the same as FIA WRC. He would make inane comments on a lot of things, and hidden in each of those comments was a subtle hint. It was painfully obvious to ManateeGal and I that he was our Traitor, then he went and faked a detective guilty on MG and the whole game fell apart.

Oh I just remembered this is the mewtaph game. I metad him recently, think I found a scumtell. Not present in his towngames and is present here at least.

Hence my vote and the "meta bad" comment

IV you might wanna watch the spelling

In post 337, innocentvillager wrote:why are there 3 votes on me? u n a c c e p t a b l e !!

oh it’s the scumteam nvm ez gg

Btw care to explain this stance?

In post 333, Datisi wrote:

In post 298, T3 wrote:This post is reading way too deep into stuff

yes
almost as if it was made halfway through page 1 of the game
what's the point of this comment

@t3 i would like you to actually answer things

In post 333, Datisi wrote:

In post 312, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 286, Datisi wrote: i dislike salsa's 253. not always coming from scum (and there has been some stuff from salsa later on i liked) but the "you are scumreading both me and this person that i voted once in very early game?? in what universe can we possibly be scum together?!?" as if that vote actually meant anything or is any kind of anti-partner indicative lol

If the vote didn’t mean anything, they why did you vote

Mew

or a deep analysis of the vote? And later, you mostly probably said you were liking their reasoning behind it. So, you're reading them based on something that

actually meant nothing[/b] according to you?

MR

later said, it’s not SvS which I read that post later. I was surprised to see that she put both of us in the scum list which indicates scum!me and scum!

Mew

started the game by theatring which is ridiculous.

because i am aware that the "deep analysis" i make on page 1 about 2 posts is going to be meaningless soon. it's already meaningless now, i don't even remember what bullshit i said there. it's meant to get discussion going, but you can bet that once we're past the initial rvs stage, i'm not gonna be basing almost any of my read on mew on the analysis i made in 17.

later on, i said i liked his response. that's got nothing to do with his votes in the game, i thought his responses to my analysis and other people voting him were townie enough.

In post 333, Datisi wrote: stop twisting my words. i didn't say that nothing mattered there, i said that your vote on mew will soon hold no significance whatsoever, or arguably already doesn't hold any significance whatsoever considering you're not even voting him anymore. so saying "me and mew cannot be scum because i voted him early game" is wrong and maybe purposefully ignorant. after thinking for 10 seconds, i can show you at least 2 games where scum entered the game theatering, probably more if i put any more brain into it.

and considering you're far from a newbie now, i'd expect you to know that scum very much can enter the game with throwaway votes on each other. so the fact that you're pretending that you voting mew somehow clears you from being partners is ridiculous, if not outright scummy.

i wasn't trying to be rude towards you, i saw you (either purposefully or accidentally) misrepping me and i'm gonna react accordingly to that. i guess excuse me for not assuming good faith from a person i am suspicious of, in a game of mafia, where i know there are people that will not have good faith towards me?

the "i'm not that confident in doing theatre early so i wouldn't do it" seems like a maybe townie thing to say, unless salsa is pretty ballsy scum, and she doesn't strike me as such?