Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2021 1:28 pm
i feel like ur playing to scum meta
and that vote feels like it's trying to stir the pot and put a new wagon on the table
i feel like ur playing to scum meta
i don't care LOL you're scumIn post 324, SCP 999 wrote:i think cakez entrance into this day was incredibly scummy and trying to just push agendas rather than solve
he was 100% reactionary to what has happened rather than genuinely analyzing anything. thus why the vague 1 liners about "hurr this scummy" kind of stuff.
also if im scum - why do I make up reasons to discard my reasoning to vote dwlee when they are very clearly playing not to town meta and very sloppily? nah lol im just not scum and the reasoning is bunk as fuck.
(connecting cakez saying dwlee is scum designated mislim to their supposed scumread on me)
If you are town then the attacking everyone who suspects you thing isn't helping meIn post 324, SCP 999 wrote:i think cakez entrance into this day was incredibly scummy and trying to just push agendas rather than solve
he was 100% reactionary to what has happened rather than genuinely analyzing anything. thus why the vague 1 liners about "hurr this scummy" kind of stuff.
also if im scum - why do I make up reasons to discard my reasoning to vote dwlee when they are very clearly playing not to town meta and very sloppily? nah lol im just not scum and the reasoning is bunk as fuck.
(connecting cakez saying dwlee is scum designated mislim to their supposed scumread on me)
i recently adopted an "omgus" playstyle because ive been snowed by too many scum who push on me :shrug: like i implied earlier - we have a playstyle clash and I acknowledge that myself - hoping you can from your end and try to put in extra effort into reading me more holistically.In post 330, Dunnstral wrote:If you are town then the attacking everyone who suspects you thing isn't helping meIn post 324, SCP 999 wrote:i think cakez entrance into this day was incredibly scummy and trying to just push agendas rather than solve
he was 100% reactionary to what has happened rather than genuinely analyzing anything. thus why the vague 1 liners about "hurr this scummy" kind of stuff.
also if im scum - why do I make up reasons to discard my reasoning to vote dwlee when they are very clearly playing not to town meta and very sloppily? nah lol im just not scum and the reasoning is bunk as fuck.
(connecting cakez saying dwlee is scum designated mislim to their supposed scumread on me)
there have been 2 votes on dwlee this whole game come on dudeIn post 322, SirCakez wrote:i literally said dwlee is a scum designated mislim with no mention of any names and you somehow felt the post was addressed to you IZ
guilty conscience
how are they bad faith?In post 333, Cephrir wrote:to put my earlier thought into understandable words
i feel like scp's response to pressure seems to consistently be to ask a ton of basically bad faith questions in an attempt to bury the person suspecting them because it takes longer to answer a question than to ask one so when they can't answer them all scp has "won the argument"
you can do that without asking 17 questionsIn post 336, SCP 999 wrote:how are they bad faith?In post 333, Cephrir wrote:to put my earlier thought into understandable words
i feel like scp's response to pressure seems to consistently be to ask a ton of basically bad faith questions in an attempt to bury the person suspecting them because it takes longer to answer a question than to ask one so when they can't answer them all scp has "won the argument"
its literally asking people to ellaborate their thought process - this is how you find town.
maybe you should listen to people who have consistent wins as town like i have been - they tell me the same thinga -look for the thought process, don't look at just the actions.
i say the last thing when people decide to start other conversation topics without answering - point out where i do so without the other person posting.In post 337, Cephrir wrote:it's like getting all up in their face in real life
why'd you do that huh?
what's with this huh?
[without waiting long enough for them to answer] why arent you saying anything huh huh huh?
are you always this fun to interact withIn post 340, SCP 999 wrote:i say the last thing when people decide to start other conversation topics without answering - point out where i do so without the other person posting.In post 337, Cephrir wrote:it's like getting all up in their face in real life
why'd you do that huh?
what's with this huh?
[without waiting long enough for them to answer] why arent you saying anything huh huh huh?
you've been playing mafia since 2006, had perhaps a higher expectation of you to understand basic mafia concepts.