Mafiascum.net

Lemme ask Ydrasse if the exit thing is only d2 or later.

Indigo gives me Gentleman 9 vibes. I'll elaborate on that in a bit.

Chart, if the previous dance games are any indicator, you can only leave the dance after all pairs are formed.

I have a feeling the rainbow knight mechanic needs to resolve first. If it has a big effect, anyway.

In post 323, Knight Chartreuse wrote:

In post 320, Knight Beige wrote:Everybody needs to be paired, and one cool knight will be left out right away.

I am thinking that I partner up with Burgundy. I think they’re scum. My strength is in townreads not scum ones so it’s not that big a deal if I am eliminated. I can just voluntarily exit at any time and it flips us both yeah?

Yeah, no. I'm not partnering with you if I have any say about it.

If you're town, then we lose a town voice that plays well with others.
If you're scum, then I likely have correct reads but am not townread enough for a nightkill.

Either way, get away from me.

Who are you townreading? Do you think my townreads are good?

In post 326, Knight Crimson wrote:Indigo gives me Gentleman 9 vibes. I'll elaborate on that in a bit.

Pretty sure this ain't allowed.

In post 328, Knight Burgundy wrote:

In post 326, Knight Crimson wrote:Indigo gives me Gentleman 9 vibes. I'll elaborate on that in a bit.

Pretty sure this ain't allowed.

Oh, I don't mean Indigo is Gentleman 9. My apologies. I mean he's scummy in the same way.

In post 328, Knight Burgundy wrote:

In post 326, Knight Crimson wrote:Indigo gives me Gentleman 9 vibes. I'll elaborate on that in a bit.

Pretty sure this ain't allowed.

If Gentleman 9 is a completed game I think it’s fine.
If Gentleman 9 is a player or uncompleted game it is not fine.

Wouldn’t we lose two town voices if I am town and you are @Burgundy?

If I am scum and I immediately take you out when you have like no scumreads that’s a pretty poor play.

I am really not seeing town Burgundy here.

nvm ugh

To answer your question: Lavender, Magenta, and through Magenta Rose.
I waffle on Crimson.

If Chart spends a scum life to take you out, Burgundy, that is an abhorrent play.

Also, I haven't read all the dance games, but I'd venture a guess and say scum never does that.

At first I was fine with Burgundy not accepting, but now I'm starting to think this could be a really interesting couple. I love a good love-hate relationship.

Although... I do worry that it might end in tragedy. Far too often a game sees TvT while those in a pair just cannot.

When you say "we lose a town voice", are you talking about yourself or Chart, out of curiosity?

Now, bad logic doesn't mean Burgundy is scum. I'm not yet convinced Burgundy is afraid of pairing with you as scum and wants out of it, it's possible that Burgundy actually thinks pairing with them is a reasonable play for scum to make. More analysis is definitely needed.

In post 330, Knight Chartreuse wrote:If Gentleman 9 is a completed game I think it’s fine.
If Gentleman 9 is a player or uncompleted game it is not fine.

Wouldn’t we lose two town voices if I am town and you are @Burgundy?

Meta arguments are not allowed regardless.

We would lose two town voices if you're town. I just figured it would be redundant to say I was town.

Can you answer my question about my reads?

In post 334, Knight Crimson wrote:When you say "we lose a town voice", are you talking about yourself or Chart, out of curiosity?

Chart. In both scenarios, we would lose my voice as a given.

thinking
azure town
crimson town]chart scum

In post 331, Knight Chartreuse wrote:If I am scum and I immediately take you out when you have like no scumreads that’s a pretty poor play.

I am really not seeing town Burgundy here.

I'm scumreading most of the Warm players, what are you talking about?

I'd get griping on my nulls but saying I have no SRs is just so wrong that I don't think scum misrep in a way that's easily verifiable.

In post 335, Knight Burgundy wrote:

In post 330, Knight Chartreuse wrote:If Gentleman 9 is a completed game I think it’s fine.
If Gentleman 9 is a player or uncompleted game it is not fine.

Wouldn’t we lose two town voices if I am town and you are @Burgundy?

Meta arguments are not allowed regardless.

We would lose two town voices if you're town. I just figured it would be redundant to say I was town.

Can you answer my question about my reads?

It's not a meta argument. Regardless, I'm making sure it's okay.

pedit: I figured as much. Chart had interpreted you as referring to yourself, I believe. I think your logic for not pairing with Chart if Chart is town is perfectly reasonable, and in fact I am leaning TvT which would probably make you a bad pair. If that continues to seem to be the case I think it would be unwise to pair with Chart.

If Chart is scum though, then by all means. If they think going into a self-destructing relationship is a good play, that doesn't make a lot of sense.

In post 337, Knight Magenta wrote:thinking
azure town
crimson town]chart scum

Why crimson town?

Why chart scum? (I strongly disagree here and need to see reasoning here.)

While we're gracing each other's presences, would you like to talk about your read of me, Burgundy?

I don't think I can keep that gimmick up while actually analyzing. Oh well, I tried.

I've mainly been focusing on cool knights, but I just want to say that I wasn't TR'ing the first Crimson but I'm TR'ing this Crimson.

Azure and Chartreuse I'm getting town vibes from. Lavender is also town. Indigo hasn't given enough to work with. Of all the cool knights, I'd say Magenta's most likely to be anti-town - a whole bunch of one-to-two word reactions that don't really have much conviction to them.

I'm also currently townreading the Rainbow Knight, but I must ask, why did you choose to be Cool? Did you have anything to inform you of the decision or was it a whim?

In post 341, Knight Crimson wrote:While we're gracing each other's presences, would you like to talk about your read of me, Burgundy?

Your stilted entrance and far too quick proposal to Lavender stuck out to me. It's only a lean because there was a lot of stilted language at the start and an early proposal is off as either alignment. Later on in my catchup, you were less memorable/drowned out.

I hate listing nulls too when they are providing content. Your recent stuff is betterish but I'm not sure if I feel that way because you like me.

In post 342, Knight Seafoam wrote:I don't think I can keep that gimmick up while actually analyzing. Oh well, I tried.

I've mainly been focusing on cool knights, but I just want to say that I wasn't TR'ing the first Crimson but I'm TR'ing this Crimson.

Azure and Chartreuse I'm getting town vibes from. Lavender is also town. Indigo hasn't given enough to work with. Of all the cool knights, I'd say Magenta's most likely to be anti-town - a whole bunch of one-to-two word reactions that don't really have much conviction to them.

I'm also currently townreading the Rainbow Knight, but I must ask, why did you choose to be Cool? Did you have anything to inform you of the decision or was it a whim?

I largely agree with this.

Very nice, Indigo is quite possibly scum. I'd leave them out, assuming Indigo is a cool colour (could be wrong).

In post 343, Knight Burgundy wrote:

In post 341, Knight Crimson wrote:While we're gracing each other's presences, would you like to talk about your read of me, Burgundy?

Your stilted entrance and far too quick proposal to Lavender stuck out to me. It's only a lean because there was a lot of stilted language at the start and an early proposal is off as either alignment. Later on in my catchup, you were less memorable/drowned out.

I hate listing nulls too when they are providing content. Your recent stuff is betterish but I'm not sure if I feel that way because you like me.

I try very hard to come close to the dizzying level of elegance Lavender exudes in each of her posts. Less so when I'm talking about the game and more so when I'm trying to impress her, though.

I have no issues with this, in any case. I hope to leave more of an impression as we proceed forward.

In post 342, Knight Seafoam wrote:but I just want to say that I wasn't TR'ing the first Crimson but I'm TR'ing this Crimson.

Crimson never got replaced, you're thinking of burgundy. So who do you really townread?

In post 347, Knight Beige wrote:

In post 342, Knight Seafoam wrote:but I just want to say that I wasn't TR'ing the first Crimson but I'm TR'ing this Crimson.

Crimson never got replaced, you're thinking of burgundy. So who do you really townread?

I also came here to make this inquiry.

I have but one love of my life.

In post 345, Knight Crimson wrote:Very nice, Indigo is quite possibly scum. I'd leave them out, assuming Indigo is a cool colour (could be wrong).

*wipes hands*

If it isn't obvious, I am expressing positive feelings towards Seaform's return here.

In post 347, Knight Beige wrote:

In post 342, Knight Seafoam wrote:but I just want to say that I wasn't TR'ing the first Crimson but I'm TR'ing this Crimson.

Crimson never got replaced, you're thinking of burgundy. So who do you really townread?

Ah, I interpreted that as Seafoam saying my playstyle switched up after I became engaged. Darn. Perhaps that is still valid, if it tricked them into believing I am two separate beings.

More likely than not though they're just thinking of Burgundy, yeah.