Mafiascum.net

In post 323, NorwegianboyEE wrote:If Queen accepts and either of Queen/Gamma are scum then we’ll kill both if they loverize right? So if one is town and the other is scum then we’ll unnecesarilly kill an extra town on top of it.
Isn’t that how this thing works?

If I rejected though then Queen would have died.

In post 276, Vulture wrote:

In post 268, redtea wrote:do you sr norwee over gamma?

Nah, Gamma over Norwee; it’s just an endorsement of Norwee as scum.

That’s mainly because I find his mentality of “let it die” clunky, which maybe isn’t as scummy as I want it to be. >_> But saying “I don’t like that pair so it shouldn’t happen” is dumb to me regardless.

The only benefit we get of Queen dying now rather than with Gamma anyways is her flip but I townread her and want her around until that moment.

Wait, Queen dies if Gamma doesn’t accept?

Ok so this setup is a lot more weird than i thought.

Yes.

People who are rejected due. It’s better to accept.

In post 291, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: accept proposal
Might as well
Just don't vote me out before I get a chance to use the PT, alright?

So if you’re scum we now need to kill Queen as well to get rid of you?

I think I'm the least enthused about pooky+redtea's deimos votes

Ok i can see why Vulture reacted like that now. I didn’t think not accepting an loverize pact would mean that the player dies. Lmao.

In post 310, T3 wrote:like there is 0 town motivation to accept queen's proposal when there's no way he even has a read on queen

not opening up room for conversation on why maybe scum paired them, not waiting until queen showed up, etc
yeah doesn't seem town

i could see gamma playing fast and loose, in which case town motivation would be banking on queen being town based on numbers

In post 312, Vulture wrote:Can we not power out another vote until Queen actually gets to talk.

^

In post 319, Clemency wrote:

In post 312, Vulture wrote:Can we not power out another vote until Queen actually gets to talk.

its two votes out of six whatcha worried about already

just trying not to start a pattern

In post 305, T3 wrote:peng feels weird and different

i dont have exp with penguin but i was thinking this

In post 332, redtea wrote:not opening up room for conversation on why maybe scum paired them, not waiting until queen showed up, etc
yeah doesn't seem town

I think it would've been scummier to wait for queen to post (assuming this isn't sarcastic)

VOTE: Pooky
I’m not doing another ElO with you.

In post 334, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 332, redtea wrote:not opening up room for conversation on why maybe scum paired them, not waiting until queen showed up, etc
yeah doesn't seem town

I think it would've been scummier to wait for queen to post (assuming this isn't sarcastic)

....????????

In post 330, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think I'm the least enthused about pooky+redtea's deimos votes

why are you making us poke you to give a "why" when you're on the hotplate

why

gamma the whole point is you can reject people you think are scum

In post 335, NorwegianboyEE wrote:VOTE: Pooky
I’m not doing another ElO with you.

I hope you're feeling better Norwee! <3

Pengy did you roll scum again or something

I don't see why scum would ever set themselves up to be rejected

seems kind of whack to me

In post 336, redtea wrote:

In post 334, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 332, redtea wrote:not opening up room for conversation on why maybe scum paired them, not waiting until queen showed up, etc
yeah doesn't seem town

I think it would've been scummier to wait for queen to post (assuming this isn't sarcastic)

....????????

In post 338, redtea wrote:gamma the whole point is you can reject people you think are scum

I'm TRing queen
try to keep up

In post 337, redtea wrote:

In post 330, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think I'm the least enthused about pooky+redtea's deimos votes

why are you making us poke you to give a "why" when you're on the hotplate

why

pooky's vote had a faux-serious vibe
yours was very weirdly rationalized, I don't entirely trust how you put the reasoning after

In post 333, redtea wrote:

In post 305, T3 wrote:peng feels weird and different

i dont have exp with penguin but i was thinking this

How do I feel weird and different if you don’t have experience with me?

In post 340, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Pengy did you roll scum again or something

Yes

You should still be soul masons with me.

VOTE: redtea
that's the second time he's made bad meta comments, first time was about me

okay.. but queen's barely been around
you wouldn't want ANY more info?

In post 342, Gamma Emerald wrote: yours was very weirdly rationalized, I don't entirely trust how you put the reasoning after

what do you mean reasoning 'after'? I never had the chance.

fwiw, since i didn't get around to it, the reason i didn't like the second of the two of deimos's posts I quoted in #158 was that, ontop of *everything else*, it looked partnery with you. At least that's what I think I thought.

Ofc it all went from "lol myb scum", atp, to "uuuh yeah actually probably scum".

In post 342, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 336, redtea wrote:

In post 334, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 332, redtea wrote:not opening up room for conversation on why maybe scum paired them, not waiting until queen showed up, etc
yeah doesn't seem town

I think it would've been scummier to wait for queen to post (assuming this isn't sarcastic)

....????????

In post 338, redtea wrote:gamma the whole point is you can reject people you think are scum

I'm TRing queen
try to keep up

In post 337, redtea wrote:

In post 330, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think I'm the least enthused about pooky+redtea's deimos votes

why are you making us poke you to give a "why" when you're on the hotplate

why

pooky's vote had a faux-serious vibe
yours was very weirdly rationalized, I don't entirely trust how you put the reasoning after

Why are you tring queen, gamma?

In post 340, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Pengy did you roll scum again or something

you a broken record or smth

In post 341, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I don't see why scum would ever set themselves up to be rejected

seems kind of whack to me

if they have a member who's considered pretty towny, it'd be a risky but rewarding move to pair them with another towny player
but early game, yeah nah prolly not

In post 343, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 333, redtea wrote:

In post 305, T3 wrote:peng feels weird and different

i dont have exp with penguin but i was thinking this

How do I feel weird and different if you don’t have experience with me?

thought it was implied i meant the "weird" part, not the "different" part

In post 345, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: redtea
that's the second time he's made bad meta comments, first time was about me

second time- where?
as for the first time... t3 agrees with me >.>