Mafiascum.net

boop

In post 324, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 314, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: Fun and Games

Serious vote?

311-313 felt like they were preempting their argument in a scummy way

In post 318, Fun and Games wrote:@dunn did u think i was townpinging u at that point

~ skitter

I took your post at face value and am not interested in discussing how actually you meaning something else is my fault.

Fun and Games seemed perfectly reasonable to me on Dunn.

Not sure how to take Dunn saying otherwise. I don't think it's intentional or malicious but if it came down to 1v1 I'd be more likely to think Dunn was the one twisting things.

In post 326, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 324, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 314, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: Fun and Games

Serious vote?

311-313 felt like they were preempting their argument in a scummy way

In post 328, Dunnstral wrote:I took your post at face value and am not interested in discussing how actually you meaning something else is my fault.

ok so the argument you're making to vote me is:
- i voted you
- because i changed my mind from my initial townping on you off of your 'hi' post with little reasoning
- even though i'm saying that i wasn't including you in that original 26
- and that me pointing that out is scummy (and if this isn't what you mean by 'preempting their argument in a scummy way' idk what you're trying to say in 326)

is that right?

like i feel like if you think i'm scummy for reversing the townping, the normal reaction upon me saying 'oh i wasn't including you in that post' would be to go 'oh ok now i realize you weren't reversing an initial townping then' vs going 'oh you're scummy for pointing that out'

~ skitteR

that was soemwhat convoluted and i'm not sure i got my point across well

In post 269, Gamma Emerald wrote:Enchant seems to enjoy being scum more and as such makes it harder to wagon him when he’s scum, he’s more passive about it as town I think (I can’t rlly substantiate this)

Actually opposite, i enjoy town more. (less than Third Party though)

I just doesh't bother to fake my reads as town, because i have no reason to lie.
Faking reads as mafia is easy, because they already know town and mafia, but claiming i carry games as mafia is overrating, it mostly me getting carried.

In post 328, Dunnstral wrote:I took your post at face value and am not interested in discussing how actually you meaning something else is my fault.

This was Dunnstral's first and only post of the game:



Dunnstral did not interact with anyone when skitter posted:



Which was about the conversation on page 1.

Is it reasonable for Dunnstral to believe that his post actually town~pinged skitter ?

I have trouble seeing it.

ehh. agreed skitter is making much more sense here than dunn. also, if skitter said that she townleaned me because i posted "hi", i would definitely question her about it, but maybe that's just me.

skitt, what's your read on me right now? assuming it's not also on standby while we wait for ico.

and, when you said that i have an extremely good read on ico in that last mini, were you being genuine, or?

yea she was impressed you caught him so fast

I thought "Slight ping" was sort of joke.

In post 256, Sleepless Assassin wrote:Almost50 do you have a read on Iconeum?

Yes. He's as strong NULL.

In post 279, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 275, Fun and Games wrote:why r u so obsessed with fighting with me lol

Bc I luv u

Stevie B? Is that you?

In post 335, Datisi wrote:skitt, what's your read on me right now? assuming it's not also on standby while we wait for ico.

and, when you said that i have an extremely good read on ico in that last mini, were you being genuine, or?

Its on standby while we wait for ico, and yes

Also i'm not really liking what enchant is choosing to comment on

~ skitter

Of course, there's so much questions to me it's hard to answer them all (0)

I mean you can talk abt things without having direct questions asked of you

But ok: do you have any reads you'd like to share?

~ skitter

In post 335, Datisi wrote:and, when you said that i have an extremely good read on ico in that last mini, were you being genuine, or?

Also why are you asking this ?
Do you think i *shouldnt* think you're good at reading ico?

~ skitter

In post 342, Fun and Games wrote:I mean you can talk abt things without having direct questions asked of you

But ok: do you have any reads you'd like to share?

~ skitter

No.

Ok then

Any other questions?

@F&G

In post 322, Bingle wrote:Why no follow up with me, catbear?

In post 329, Sleepless Assassin wrote:Fun and Games seemed perfectly reasonable to me on Dunn.

Not sure how to take Dunn saying otherwise. I don't think it's intentional or malicious but if it came down to 1v1 I'd be more likely to think Dunn was the one twisting things.

Ewww.

A50 like 80% town.