i feel like what fruits doing should be scummy, but also i know he hasnt forumed before so he must be so confused so imo we should let him pass for a lil while longer because i feel bad for him (:
WHY NOT LMAO YALL CAN SHEEP ME IF YOU WANT
but fr tho, sure i sus some people but the amount of confidence i like tobhave before voting isnt there yet. maybe ill reread after work :kekw:
In post 251, Isis wrote:I know there's a false positive rate to it but I'd be pretty ok killing someone for posting this
more specifically i can just
visualize scumskitter posting it and townskitter not
it's like
text indicating suspicion on her just has higher priority for interpretation than other content, causing the egregious error (she's clearly not kidding? both in structure and it's not remotely skitter's brand of humor, she's not really a court jester)
I don't think Aris posted suspicion about skit at any point
I know i'm gonna get mudslapped for level -1 gawtcha reads
ok so this might be stupid and I will look bad for thinking this if skitter is actually mafia
but I think scum!her is more careful about posting things like this whereas town!her is more off the cuff and jokey.
This sounds correct
This is ironically an undersell of skitter, I think she's plenty brave enough to say "that person is about to vote me not foo or bar" as scum. The question is factual awareness as each alignment.
You're evaluating a different axis than the one I care about and saying she's +town on that axis, and I disagree, and even if so it should be far less impactful than the one I'm pointing at, unless you think skitter plays mafia like a supporting character in a horror film and wouldn't dare make mundane similar posts like "oh no when Jason said he planned to vote for the author of post 43 he meant me, it wasn't the post directly above his".
my loyal sheep are making me doubt that theyre all loyal..
If it helps I didn't even realize you were voting Gamma I think their posts on page 12 were so bad they deserve a vote regardless
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 6:03 am
by Isis
In post 304, Meuh wrote: VOTE: Gamma Emerald
Not engaging with my response to GL’s argument at all, not asking me any questions to try sorting me, just echoing what’s already been said.
You have more experience playing with me (and a more accurate history of reading me) than GL and you’ve already seen Marci’s D1 tonal reads on me be very wrong.
The fact you’re willing to just go along with this push and rely on Marci/GL would be more understandable if we had never played together.
But here, I think it’s pretty telling.
How do I turn on emotes it's just showing me the words and I think my alignment interpretation of this post changed infinitesimally if I can see them @YDRASSE HELP ME
I know there's a false positive rate to it but I'd be pretty ok killing someone for posting this
more specifically i can just
visualize scumskitter posting it and townskitter not
it's like
text indicating suspicion on her just has higher priority for interpretation than other content, causing the egregious error (she's clearly not kidding? both in structure and it's not remotely skitter's brand of humor, she's not really a court jester)
I don't think Aris posted suspicion about skit at any point
I know i'm gonna get mudslapped for level -1 gawtcha reads
but i know swift
actually i don't know swift i can't just be quiet and vig on the opinion that's how that metaphor would work
when you deliver a joke you do not laugh at your own joke
it's a core rule of humor
Jimmy Fallon does so and it is remarked upon as the exception that proves the rule
1. i laugh at my own jokes wtf
2. i feel like this is making a bigger deal over nothing than it should be, i dont see why ur bent on it..? can u pls explain more?
I cannot count the number of times I've been upset about the number of people attacking me when I'm scum and later discovered it was fewer than I thought. There's this constant weird cognitive bias to more quickly accept final interpretations of events where you are under attack because you know you're scum and it's "correct". I expect this to function similarly across most players, maybe exempting ones that think they're unbeatable when they roll scum, but that's like, something 75% true that skitter 15% believes based on her posts across games :pika_dizzy:
my loyal sheep are making me doubt that theyre all loyal..
If it helps I didn't even realize you were voting Gamma I think their posts on page 12 were so bad they deserve a vote regardless
Her
Thanks gotcha Isis
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 6:20 am
by Isis
I think the gamma case might be more pink than red. The weird thing about it is that meuh's point sounds very based in meta and could be a strong taking of the lay of the land of all that math is correct, but everyone is willing to me too the wagon and surely not all of them played the same game.
I guess this is a two scum game so "this person doesn't seem to have partners in the aggregate" is weaker
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 6:22 am
by Isis
The op says three scum I thought people said we could win in two lims tho
