Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2022 8:55 am
302 is an interesting post though.
In post 329, JunkoChan wrote:@NK15 could you elaborate a bit more about your case on gamma? before i vote
Junko never said that the vote would be on Gamma though...In post 332, Gamma Emerald wrote:Not sure what the is to point out but I’ll clarify
Junko unvoted, but immediately doubled back to wanting to vote me, but is now asking NK15 for his case
In post 85, Gamma Emerald wrote:So, despite the statistical evidence supporting there being multiple scum in the 1s, you have somehow "ruled them out" already. Yeah that's bogus.In post 75, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:In post 37, Gamma Emerald wrote:And why do you not think it’s within JC/NM, or the FIVE people that picked 1?IDRC ABOUT THE 1 CHOICES, I RULED THAT NUMBER OUT RIGHT AWAY.In post 38, Gamma Emerald wrote:And it better be a good reason because I can already think of one, and it’s not a great look for you Sir Bear
THE SHADE IN #38 IS MORE INDICATIVE OF SCUM.
VOTE: Gamma
VOTE: SCRRRDBEAR
Gamma just pushed Bear with a vote for the above. Yet, only a few posts later, Gamma attributes what Bear says with "a lack of critical thinking" instead.In post 91, Gamma Emerald wrote:Clearly critical thinking is something Sir Bear is lacking in rn
are you really this self centered or are you actually afraid?In post 332, Gamma Emerald wrote:Not sure what the is to point out but I’ll clarify
Junko unvoted, but immediately doubled back to wanting to vote me, but is now asking NK15 for his case
I said that because instead of actually going for something with bite to it, Bear went for the OMGUS accusationIn post 335, Not Known 15 wrote:In post 85, Gamma Emerald wrote:So, despite the statistical evidence supporting there being multiple scum in the 1s, you have somehow "ruled them out" already. Yeah that's bogus.In post 75, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:In post 37, Gamma Emerald wrote:And why do you not think it’s within JC/NM, or the FIVE people that picked 1?IDRC ABOUT THE 1 CHOICES, I RULED THAT NUMBER OUT RIGHT AWAY.In post 38, Gamma Emerald wrote:And it better be a good reason because I can already think of one, and it’s not a great look for you Sir Bear
THE SHADE IN #38 IS MORE INDICATIVE OF SCUM.
VOTE: Gamma
VOTE: SCRRRDBEARGamma just pushed Bear with a vote for the above. Yet, only a few posts later, Gamma attributes what Bear says with "a lack of critical thinking" instead.In post 91, Gamma Emerald wrote:Clearly critical thinking is something Sir Bear is lacking in rn
I have a way of parsing sentences that returns mixed results on poorly written postsIn post 338, JunkoChan wrote:are you really this self centered or are you actually afraid?In post 332, Gamma Emerald wrote:Not sure what the is to point out but I’ll clarify
Junko unvoted, but immediately doubled back to wanting to vote me, but is now asking NK15 for his case
the thing about scum is that when asked to rephrase is harder to do becuase it's a lie or an act, and nk15 hasn't said much until nowIn post 340, Gamma Emerald wrote:I have a way of parsing sentences that returns mixed results on poorly written postsIn post 338, JunkoChan wrote:are you really this self centered or are you actually afraid?In post 332, Gamma Emerald wrote:Not sure what the is to point out but I’ll clarify
Junko unvoted, but immediately doubled back to wanting to vote me, but is now asking NK15 for his case
So tl;dr, ya basic
But seriously, unless you’re voting one of me or NK, what’s the relevance of his case on me to your vote?
i'll ignore this
I retract my previous town read.In post 346, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Bleu cheese is yucky