FFVII Mafia: Over

Zac · Post Post #325 (ISO) » Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:54 am

What your role PM?

Grimmy · Post Post #326 (ISO) » Tue Sep 16, 2008 3:36 am

I need to read this when I have some more time, either later today or in the next day or so. But some quick thoughts.

I have been in and/or seen games when Albert has lied through his teeth about his role. Whether or not this has come back to bite him in the ass, im nore sure yet.

Xtomx vs Armlx

I want to read everything before making a decision on this, but my guy feeling at first was that xtomx was trying to get the town to lynch armlx because he has historically been a very strong player in these mafia games. just my initial thoughts, and with a read through, this can chance easily.

Grimmy
will post more soon

Xtoxm · Post Post #327 (ISO) » Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:53 am

- Both of you: When can you send in the target of your investigation, and when do you get the result?

Anytime during the day, before a lynch has been reached. I get the result right away. (With mod delay obv)

- Does it, anywhere in your roles, explicitly state that you detect scum and/or that you are cops?

Cop yes, scum no, though I find it hard to believe Shinra =/= Scum.

- Are there any other restrictions or defining features that can help distinguish your role from "normal" cops and/or someone faking? Not counting formatting or anything else you shouldn't be quoting.

Well other than the Daytime thing, not that comes to mind no.

My activity will be down a lot now, btw.

MrBuddyLee · Post Post #328 (ISO) » Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:58 am

OOGEY BOOGEY YADDA YADDA YADDA

iLord · Post Post #329 (ISO) » Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:37 am

Can't talk much today. I'm pretty busy, and I"ll catch up tommorrow.

armlx · Post Post #330 (ISO) » Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:05 am

XTOXM, WHEN DID YOU USE YOUR DAY COP ABILITY?

Do not ignore questions plz.

Zac · Post Post #331 (ISO) » Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:32 pm

Sorry for not posting much these last few days, just been real busy. Ill start posting more now.

wolframnhart · Post Post #332 (ISO) » Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:33 pm

Zac wrote:Sorry for not posting much these last few days, just been real busy. Ill start posting more now.

Think you have posted more then a few players lol

Zac · Post Post #333 (ISO) » Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:56 pm

=p, i guess so lol.

MBPikamon · Post Post #334 (ISO) » Tue Sep 16, 2008 1:02 pm

Eh, since the Xtomx debate ended, there isn't really that much to talk about.

armlx · Post Post #335 (ISO) » Tue Sep 16, 2008 1:07 pm

Eh, since the Xtomx debate ended, there isn't really that much to talk about.

It ended?

MBPikamon · Post Post #336 (ISO) » Tue Sep 16, 2008 1:08 pm

Well, it atleast slowed down alot.

armlx · Post Post #337 (ISO) » Tue Sep 16, 2008 1:10 pm

Ok. And that's a reason to stop talking/progressing the game?

MBPikamon · Post Post #338 (ISO) » Tue Sep 16, 2008 1:10 pm

Eh, I hadn't been posting much during it either actually.

armlx · Post Post #339 (ISO) » Tue Sep 16, 2008 1:13 pm

Eh, I hadn't been posting much during it either actually.

Why?

MBPikamon · Post Post #340 (ISO) » Tue Sep 16, 2008 1:16 pm

I think my playstyle would be defined as an active lurker one, rather accurately personally.

armlx · Post Post #341 (ISO) » Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:19 pm

I think my playstyle would be defined as an active lurker one, rather accurately personally.

Do you have examples to back this up?

iamausername · Post Post #342 (ISO) » Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:29 pm

MBPikamon wrote:Eh, since the Xtomx debate ended, there isn't really that much to talk about.

It's not going to end until either Xtoxm or armlx is lynched, which is the only logical way for this day to play out. You're not voting for either right now; why not?

armlx · Post Post #343 (ISO) » Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:33 pm

To those who said ABR's claim was "conveniently" timed, why was xtoxm's not?

iamausername · Post Post #344 (ISO) » Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:34 pm

P.S. that question goes out to anyone else who is not voting one of Xtoxm/armlx either.

Jebus · Post Post #345 (ISO) » Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:57 pm

Alright, I've read up on everything now, and

yeesh

.

@the Xotxm lynch - not quite a good one. He claimed a pro-town role. He seemed to bring upon the kamikaze-type thing. To a scum, a 1:1 death ratio is terrible, and there wouldn't be any initiative to do this on day 1. This is why I'm reluctant to vote Xotxm.

Vote: Arlmx

Zac · Post Post #346 (ISO) » Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:33 am

iamausername wrote:
MBPikamon wrote:Eh, since the Xtomx debate ended, there isn't really that much to talk about.
It's not going to end until either Xtoxm or armlx is lynched, which is the only logical way for this day to play out. You're not voting for either right now; why not?

Vote: iamusername

CallMeLiam · Post Post #347 (ISO) » Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:33 am

In an effort to spark something else up:
ABR what made you decide to counterclaim when you did? Would it not have made more sense to wait and see how the bandwagon went? I mean, Armlx wasn't close to the lynch, and Xtox was floundering anyway. There was always a chance he could have turned it around and outing yourself would be surplus to requirements.

wolframnhart · Post Post #348 (ISO) » Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:55 am

Zac wrote:
iamausername wrote:
MBPikamon wrote:Eh, since the Xtomx debate ended, there isn't really that much to talk about.
It's not going to end until either Xtoxm or armlx is lynched, which is the only logical way for this day to play out. You're not voting for either right now; why not?

Vote: iamusername

So... you are voting iamsurename for..what? Saying he logical way this day will end is in an armlx or xtoxm lynch? Right now i agree with iamusername.

armlx · Post Post #349 (ISO) » Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:16 am

To a scum, a 1:1 death ratio is terrible, and there wouldn't be any initiative to do this on day 1.

Except if, like xtoxm, you had a building wagon on you are were likely to be lynched.... 0 for 1 < 1 for 1.

I don't get what Zac is doing, but it definitely deserves a

FOS Zac

.