Page 131 of 201

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 12:00 pm
by Reasonably Rational
Gamma, you need to elaborate on how you get your results.

-Cerb

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 12:00 pm
by Maid Cafe
In post 3245, Reasonably Rational wrote:Yes, and you just fucked catching the other scum today, based on their associatives with your guilties, by stating it outright for no fucking reason 4 hours into the phrase.

-Cerb
Sorry I have literally 0 idea how to approach this day phase when like none of the town want to cooperate.

~B

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 12:02 pm
by Taly
In post 3251, Maid Cafe wrote:
In post 3245, Reasonably Rational wrote:Yes, and you just fucked catching the other scum today, based on their associatives with your guilties, by stating it outright for no fucking reason 4 hours into the phrase.

-Cerb
Sorry I have literally 0 idea how to approach this day phase when like none of the town want to cooperate.

~B
*Raises hand, and points to self with another. Picks up a sign that says "let's talk" and then flails arms at the playerlist*

((Honestly, last post here.))

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 12:02 pm
by Reasonably Rational
In post 3251, Maid Cafe wrote:
In post 3245, Reasonably Rational wrote:Yes, and you just fucked catching the other scum today, based on their associatives with your guilties, by stating it outright for no fucking reason 4 hours into the phrase.

-Cerb
Sorry I have literally 0 idea how to approach this day phase when like none of the town want to cooperate.

~B
You should have shut up until everyone spoke if you wanted to get more information and people weren't cooperating, instead of just saying that to what is effectively no benefit.

Yes, you might get some reactions, but it would be way stronger to specifically push people you suspect of being teammates of your confirmed scum to condemn said scum, to either strengthen or weaken your scumread on them, at the least.

Now you can't do that nearly as effectively.

-Cerb

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 12:03 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 3240, Taly wrote:Explain why you tracked who you tracked.
I didn't have any thoughts on who might have a visiting power so I just scattershotted to learn as many as possible.

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 12:03 pm
by Reasonably Rational
Also, only like half the game has posted so far. You can't even say the town won't cooperate when you've only heard from half the game.

-Cerb

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 12:03 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 3250, Reasonably Rational wrote:Gamma, you need to elaborate on how you get your results.

-Cerb
Which ones?

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 12:05 pm
by Reasonably Rational
The night action results.

The day action ones sound like you just get a correct/incorrect back.

-Cerb

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 12:06 pm
by Almost50
Weird! How did you guess?? :igmeou:

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 12:07 pm
by Reasonably Rational
I'm finding this ever so much more interesting at the moment:




~D

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 12:12 pm
by Almost50
In post 3061, Chara wrote:so we're playing an undertale game now!
At least I didn't get the Annoying Dog role! :P :lol: :lol:

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 12:14 pm
by Maid Cafe
I mean I have to do the following things.

All within 48 hours.
Get my town reads to cooperate.
Sell you on my reads being correct.
Make sure people don't waste day actions.

Like idk it's hard to play this correctly.

~B

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 12:20 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 3257, Reasonably Rational wrote:The night action results.

The day action ones sound like you just get a correct/incorrect back.

-Cerb
The track I get either who they visited or no action I believe. It says it's a track so I don't think Varsoon would just make it "they acted" when that's not the standard usage of the role

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 12:24 pm
by Reasonably Rational
In post 3262, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 3257, Reasonably Rational wrote:The night action results.

The day action ones sound like you just get a correct/incorrect back.

-Cerb
The track I get either who they visited or no action I believe. It says it's a track so I don't think Varsoon would just make it "they acted" when that's not the standard usage of the role
Using the words "I believe" means you didn't ask the mod, or you don't want to be called to account when things are actually different than you claimed. I suspect you didn't ask.

If you could, ask Varsoon the form your answers would come in, and how they would be arranged if you received multiple positives.

For multiple negatives, what form was your result in?

-Cerb

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 12:25 pm
by Reasonably Rational
In post 3261, Maid Cafe wrote:I mean I have to do the following things.

All within 48 hours.
Get my town reads to cooperate.
Sell you on my reads being correct.
Make sure people don't waste day actions.

Like idk it's hard to play this correctly.

~B
Eh, you could have just told me that what you're doing is more important than rushing the end of the day, and I'd have been like eh, maybe, we'll see.

-Cerb

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 12:28 pm
by Bronya Zaychik
In post 3261, Maid Cafe wrote:I mean I have to do the following things.

All within 48 hours.
Get my town reads to cooperate.
Sell you on my reads being correct.
Make sure people don't waste day actions.

Like idk it's hard to play this correctly.

~B
If you have two guilties, Cerb is correct that you should have waited. Since you did not, I'd recommend creating two pools that contain your guilties (could be 1 1 or 0 2) to test reactions on lynching.

~Titus

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 12:28 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 3261, Maid Cafe wrote:I mean I have to do the following things.

All within 48 hours.
Get my town reads to cooperate.
Sell you on my reads being correct.
Make sure people don't waste day actions.

Like idk it's hard to play this correctly.

~B
Why would day actions be wasted? I think it would be wiser to use them quickly given we only have a day in this setup.

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 12:31 pm
by Maid Cafe
In post 3265, Bronya Zaychik wrote:If you have two guilties, Cerb is correct that you should have waited. Since you did not, I'd recommend creating two pools that contain your guilties (could be 1 1 or 0 2) to test reactions on lynching.

~Titus
Maybe.

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 12:40 pm
by Maid Cafe
I am thinking of just posting my POE.

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 12:47 pm
by Venmar
what the actual fuck

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 12:51 pm
by Skybird
In post 3213, Bronya Zaychik wrote:Can we just get my answers from D1? Who else was in red hood? Did they claim to each other?

I still wanna lynch Micc.

I don't see any MtG claims today, nor do I see any point in doing so. We could wind up back at MTG.

~Titus
I'm still reading through to catch up but I wanted to answer this. There were only three people in the red hood, myself, Shining Dreamers, and Iconeum. We did not claim to each other but I am confident that Iconeum is town.

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 1:31 pm
by Skybird
I think this is pretty cool!

MC, I was talking with Ico in the red hood (which is now closed) about Nancy Drew/Micc. Micc did not seem town and Nancy hasn't done anything to town the slot up. I have no problem voting there.

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 1:46 pm
by Venmar
that face when taly starts crumbling down your alisae townread

taly's push on gamma makes me hesitate. feels like an agenda-pushed read, taly's really just yelling gamma down for refusing to agree to a massclaim, which advocating for as he is here reads as super awkward since i don't think anyone here really knows what is going on and taly is giving me the impression that he somehow does?

taly can you lay out for me where alisae sits on the gamma read

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 1:50 pm
by Taly
Spoiler: My Posting Habits, and How That's Fucked Right Now
By myself, I have a system where I typically make 1-2 heavy-content posts in my games per day.

In this hydra, it's becoming more like a bunch of conversational posts, until I say
"I have life stuff, bye for a few hours."
Specifically since I'm the one posting for us.

This is usually NAI for me.

Since my play right now is different than usual, I wanted to make this distinction. I will say
Town-Taly
is all about communication and
Scum-Taly
diverts it away from himself.

Becasue this is meta-talk in a sense, I fully welcome someone talking to me about this, and asking about my games. I'm happy to send links.

Venmar wrote:that face when taly starts crumbling down your alisae townread

taly's push on gamma makes me hesitate. feels like an agenda-pushed read, taly's really just yelling gamma down for refusing to agree to a massclaim, which advocating for as he is here reads as super awkward since i don't think anyone here really knows what is going on and taly is giving me the impression that he somehow does?

taly can you lay out for me where alisae sits on the gamma read
Literally,
Alisae
is the person telling me to PUSH
Gamma
. She's a driving force just as well as I am.

We
BOTH
scumread him, and we
BOTH
believe that MtG claims are highly effective right now.

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 2:07 pm
by Bronya Zaychik
In post 3267, Maid Cafe wrote:
In post 3265, Bronya Zaychik wrote:If you have two guilties, Cerb is correct that you should have waited. Since you did not, I'd recommend creating two pools that contain your guilties (could be 1 1 or 0 2) to test reactions on lynching.

~Titus
Maybe.
For more on how to handle guilties in larges, check out Wake's Role Madness and Real Folks Blues. The former is when I was trying to figure out how to handle guilties as a gunsmith. The latter I was more seasoned but passed through my guilties via the neighborhood I was in. Alisae was in RFB but died n1 I believe.

~Titus