Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2022 10:26 pm
vote count 6.01
with 3 votes in play, it takes 2 to make a decision. day 6 ends in (expired on 2022-03-22 12:30:00).
uh yeah, when I started doing this I remembered how many pages and pages and pages of wallposts and crap there were go through in the early game and never really got far with itIn post 3245, Umlaut wrote:Working on a post highlighting Andante'a behavior toward the wagons on known scum but it might not be done til tonight because I have to actually do my job at work today
In post 788, Umlaut wrote:Haven't done more catchup and probably won't have time to do more today since I'm at work (and then doing Valentine's Day stuff) but I like that both Fire and Frozen seem to have actually made the effort to read what I've written so far. And I also like that Frozen is arguing points with me even though I called her town.
Agree with others this is ugly, that first sentence compresses to "town who isn't a PR is unlikely to say they are" which is not exactly a revelation.In post 694, Nero Cain wrote:scum are far more likely to claim a PR to get out of an elimination than town unless said town is a pr. Not impossible that we did hit a town pr and I guess the correct play might be to give him a day or 2
Umlaunt is "catching up" but knows the consensus is "NERO MAF!!" so Umlaunt is like "yeah nero is looking bad" sees me, then is like "why would you possibly tr nero here?" when like, I'm pretty sure I said why, it was more of like a vibes read, felt like nero was town there, until the claim then I got sold on nero maf, and I'll go look it up, but I'm pretty sure Umlaunt was one of the ones going at me for "voting a pr claim" when like, even night gs, when we have a backup, makes 0 sense...
In post 2439, Nero Cain wrote:I'm an even night gunsmith so lets not vote town and TW instead.
In post 2440, Andante wrote:lol yeah no I'm leaving my vote
In post 2442, Andante wrote:also I don't buy you're a town pr... you were on e-1 before,had like no reaction to it
In post 2446, Umlaut wrote:UNVOTE: NeroIn post 2439, Nero Cain wrote:I'm an even night gunsmith so lets not vote town and TW instead.
Provisionally accepting this claim, may revisit later depending on what happens. Nero would be a good investigation target if someone has an investigation that distinguishes Town Gunsmith from Mafia [Whatever].
Hockey, can you say whether you are a backup gunsmith specifically, or a backup of something else? (No need to say what else if not gunsmith)
Why is this bad? If I'm a PR I don't claim until I absolutely have to.In post 2442, Andante wrote:also I don't buy you're a town pr... you were on e-1 before,had like no reaction to it
In post 2447, Umlaut wrote:Did you hint at this anywhere?In post 2444, Dwlee99 wrote:I felt like Nero was obviously a PR even D1 sad
In post 2448, Umlaut wrote:Nero, tell me why TW.
if it comes from scum, and you've been "convinced" I'm scum, why have you like not pushed me AT ALL when we had 2 MLs... instead, you feel like Nero's push on me will gain traction, so then you go for me in that moment?In post 2451, Umlaut wrote:Actually no
VOTE: Andante
Instantly disbelieving a PR claim usually comes from scum imo
That means you thought he was obviously town, not obviously a PR. I'm not saying youIn post 2450, Dwlee99 wrote:By not voting the Nero wagon?In post 2447, Umlaut wrote:Did you hint at this anywhere?In post 2444, Dwlee99 wrote:I felt like Nero was obviously a PR even D1 sadshouldhave hinted at this just asking if youdid.
lolIn post 2455, Andante wrote:lol it's umlaut and nero!!! that's funny
based on how Nero interacted all game, there's no way this isn't S/S interaction... call it an "attempt to distance" or whatever you'd like, but, Nero and umlaunt are mafIn post 2454, Nero Cain wrote:My scum vibes are tingling. I have a headache and I'm busy later today so I'll go into more detail later but basically I feel like he's just been floating around for most of the game and d1 he went from scum reading Greeting to hopping off Greeting for ???? reason.In post 2448, Umlaut wrote:Nero, tell me why TW.
cause I'm not sure in what world (we know this is 2 maf talking to each other) the maf team is gonna push like this, but then, if I was there and aware that was going to happen, I'd just bus them harder? like, I literally unvote nero... what reason would I have to unvote, instead of continuing to tunnel Nero's bad claim, KNOWING both my partners were like "lol get andante" just doesn't make sense to me. Just like that night kill makes 0 sense. I HAVE SO MANY INTERACTIONS WITH SCORP AND NERO.... Umlaunt, you thought you could survive a 1v1 with me? bring it, I would LOVE TO SEE why I'm maf. cause apparently you're convinced I'm maf, thus you had zero issue voting me, but I haven't even seen a legit reason from you for why I'm maf all game
Agree with wave here like, me INSTANTLY disbelieving the claim, how the heck would I be maf there? ok I guess this is gonna be "partners, and thus you're bussing.. ok right, I'll find the next posts which are definitely a bus!!In post 2460, wavemode wrote:I find the opposite is true... scum suffer from TMI, thus they often feel like they *have* to believe claims or else they will look bad once it turns out they are wrongIn post 2451, Umlaut wrote:Instantly disbelieving a PR claim usually comes from scum imo
the only times I've seen someone instantly disbelieve a pre-lylo claim (except a guilty on themself, of course), they've been town
in fact just yesterday fire did not believe hockey's claim. how was that different?
Ah yes, bussing my partner and calling him a JOAT, when he definitely wasn't...In post 2481, Andante wrote:"I'm an even night role, and tonight is an even night. let me live 1 more night!" that just screams JOAT/strongarmIn post 2478, wavemode wrote:can the people who do not believe nero's claim please take a stance on hockeyfan. are they scum fakeclaiming GS and backup GS together? and why do you believe so
Like, if I'm bussing nero... I say this? no. if I'm bussing, I think I'd commit to a bus, full send. no brakesIn post 2548, Andante wrote:VOTE: eyes
if we can't yeet a pr, I'm down to yeet the one who voluntarily claimed VT d1
You think me being all over the place is bad? it's called a natural progression of reads, one which you never stopped to ask me "Hey andante, what made you flip from this read to that read?" no, it's cause you're maf and you don't actually care why I flipped, my flip from tr to sr only became bad because it was your partner, and you're trying to use that as fuel so partner doesn't dieIn post 2462, Umlaut wrote:in general I've found Andante's play all over the place and still think her saying that she would/wouldn't/would vote Nero depending on whether that's where the town is going at that moment to be awful, particularly on the condition Nero is town.
Instantly jumping to defend nero, but this time interaction with your partner "for distance"In post 2463, Umlaut wrote:How would it not be possible? Even-Night Gunsmith is a normal role, that's all that's required.In post 2459, Scorpious wrote:is Nero's role mechanically possible? I need the big brains for this one.
stems from having TMI, you know eyes town, know town has a wrong read... so you feel "by correcting" that read, town points.... rightIn post 2464, Umlaut wrote:Do you really believe scum doubles down on a VT claim when told someone has a mech guilty on them?In post 2456, Dwlee99 wrote:I swear we are never going to kill eyes lol
If there is a vigilante please for the love of god shoot eyes tyvm
this was my exact thought process with the claim, like, if backup is "more powerful" makes NO SENSE... yet Umlaut jumped straight to defending the claim, no questions about itIn post 2466, fireisredsir wrote:imo the only question is if it makes sense for the setup to have an even-night gunsmith and then a backup gunsmith (which is apparently not even-night). and to that i really have no idea
Went silent after this post, Dwlee going "well that'd be claiming scum" and Umlaut probably was like "oh no! panic! I'm towny no more?? I'll just dissapear, since I've been TRed thus far for doing nothing"In post 2480, Dwlee99 wrote:That's a scum claim. If you didn't claim ascetic in first post...In post 2479, Umlaut wrote:Claim like Ascetic Visitor or some other low- to negative-utility role, and say you were happy to eat a launch because you were probably worse than a VT anyway.In post 2473, Dwlee99 wrote:Yes what is the other optionIn post 2464, Umlaut wrote:Do you really believe scum doubles down on a VT claim when told someone has a mech guilty on them?In post 2456, Dwlee99 wrote:I swear we are never going to kill eyes lol
If there is a vigilante please for the love of god shoot eyes tyvm