Page 132 of 191

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:11 pm
by Gentleman 6
In post 1347, Lady 7 wrote:
In post 1345, Gentleman 3 wrote:That's dumb.
maybe

but

your face is dumb?
fucking rekt

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:11 pm
by Gentleman 6
(yes, this is me reading G3 again. he posts some smart things.)

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:17 pm
by Gentleman 6
I think G3/L6 is likely the Moment/TheBrie of this game where the constituent players are lynchbaity and not strong performers so even though they're obvtown and are paired by some random buff handsome stranger together people will refuse to take them seriously as an endgame TvT pair.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:18 pm
by Gentleman 6
Also the anon game is a sham at this point, there's only 5 players I haven't identified.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:19 pm
by Gentleman 6
(The new read isn't G3, it's G1.)

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:27 pm
by Gentleman 6
Obviousness of anon alt tier list:

HMMM :THINKING:
Gentleman 6
Original Gentleman 4
Lady 6

Obvious
Lady 8
Gentleman 3
Lady 4

Reasonably guessable:
Lady 3
Gentleman 4

Obscureish
Gentleman 2
Gentleman 1
Lady 9

Lolstalkingonlines
Lady 1

Who the fuck are these people
everyone else

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:30 pm
by Gentleman 4
I think I'm only reasonably guessable to you because I interacted with you in the same ways I have in the past. To most people I don't think I'm in that range (although possibly, I guess). Either way, I want Gentleman 1 to interact in real time before I push for that pair to be lynched.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:38 pm
by Lady 2
I made a request to G1 to set aside time to chat directly without interruptions in our PT but he hasn't responded. I agree that his stream-of-consciousness catchup posted this evening is at best unimpressive and says almost nothing, kind of typing just to type - a few questions where I think the answers are completely irrelevant. And you could fill several pages about L5 being inconsistent and whatever and it still wouldn't mean anything. Some people are made of moon logic. Dipping into the marshmallow fluff isn't actually doing something meaningful.
In post 3073, Lady 8 wrote:
In post 3044, Gentleman 5 wrote:
In post 3040, Lady 5 wrote:
@Mod


Am I allowed to quote stuff from PT?
Yes do it
Stop being a dick and encouraging others to rule break even if that slot is bad.
In post 3085, Lady 5 wrote:Also love how L2 joined onto the G5/L4 Wagon.
Makes me question if L2 thought through before voting them.
Read my posts then try again. Ugh, just disengage, L2, there is no there there.
In post 3121, Gentleman 4 wrote:VOTE: Gentleman 8

I believe that's five votes, making this L-4. That's an estimation, though. Right now I have Lady 2, 3, and 8 voting for this pair as well as Gentlemen 4 and 5. I might be wrong on this count.
I'm still voting G5/L4

G6, I would eventually like to be sold on L6-Town, I just kind of set it aside as you had a strong Townread there and I kind of didn't but fine. And G3 I'm leaning Town on. Unless I'm dead before intermission or something in which case my opinion on whether G3/L6 is really an endgame duo is not relevant.
In post 3214, Gentleman 4 wrote:Gentleman 1 and Lady 2: Not really a pairing I was considering at the beginning of the day, I like Gentleman 1 for the most part, but Lady 2's flip could help determine the alignment of several other players here and I've been less and less convinced by her posting recently.
This might well be the answer today, much as I might have liked playing longer - I have plans to proactively and expediently read G1 in PT ASAP to speed the process along so I have a better sense of what it's worth here - but at some point it might be good for me to know what my flip would tell you. If it's really information-rich, well, that's a meaningful data point in favor of it as a good first-dance lynch, fairly speaking.
In post 3247, Gentleman 5 wrote:
In post 3245, Lady 4 wrote:
In post 3239, Gentleman 4 wrote:This specifically is what interests me. Feedback on this.
I am exactly zero interested in lynching lady 2 for unflipped associatives.
If L5 flips scum can you be convinced?
You are scum stirring pots and muddying waters and I like my vote.
In post 3214, Gentleman 4 wrote:Gentleman 1 and Lady 2: Not really a pairing I was considering at the beginning of the day, I like Gentleman 1 for the most part, but Lady 2's flip could help determine the alignment of several other players here and I've been less and less convinced by her posting recently.
In post 3250, Gentleman 4 wrote:I won't support that lynch based on unflipped associative s either.
???
In post 3252, Gentleman 6 wrote:How's this as a compromise:

third and last lynch of the day is L5/G8 and shut up about them until then
Wait, I thought we get a max of two lynches first dance? We have 16 alive, each lynch gets rid of two, we go to intermission at deadline or 12 or fewer players remaining?
In post 3262, Gentleman 6 wrote:I also as a niche advantage think that L2 has reasonable amount of scum equity so I think that even if I end up being wrong on G1 we still might end up walking away with one scum.
Might even get a twofer if the effort to establish L2 as his townread and the hold off on pairing was because they're SvS.

Not that I would be like lynching L2 on her own.
Vaguely comforting but not really. Your case on G1 is more than fair and I guess being the last Lady to pair, bad luck or otherwise, just does make me more worth lynching.

G4's thoughts that G3 is bad in the same way G1 is are just???? They have little in common???

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:40 pm
by Gentleman 6
Don't take that as I think you're scum, take that as I don't think you're obvtown.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:40 pm
by Gentleman 6
I have a strong feeling that I know who 2 of the scum are, the last one is rather opaque to me atm.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:45 pm
by Gentleman 6
If my pairing dies over intermission, my dying wish is that you guys treat G3/L6 pairing as conftown.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:46 pm
by Gentleman 6
In post 3282, Lady 2 wrote:G4's thoughts that G3 is bad in the same way G1 is are just???? They have little in common???
100% agree with this.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:48 pm
by Lady 2
In post 3283, Gentleman 6 wrote:Don't take that as I think you're scum, take that as I don't think you're obvtown.
I understand and that's fair, sometimes I have an irrational emotional attachment to the idea that I should always seem obvtown. That's not always going to happen and even optimal Townplay (which is not what I think I typically achieve) sometimes results in not seeming obvtown and I can accept that intellectually.

Side note, my only solid main-guess right now is also in your "Who the fuck are these people" category.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:50 pm
by Gentleman 6
You playstyle is familiar to me enough that I'm positive I've played with you in the past. I am fairly confident that I could figure out who you were if it was a major goal of mine but unfortunately it isn't right now :P

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:51 pm
by Lady 2
Lol I have spent no time thinking about mains because I know I'd be bad at it and it would be a waste of my time; my one solid guess is pretty much incidental.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:53 pm
by Lady 5
@FakeGod

Maybe Prod Gent 8?

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:14 pm
by Gentleman 4
@Lady 2 - the first post is just me talking about positives to the lynch, not actual support for it if that makes any sense. I can rephrase if it doesn't.

Maybe I'm wrong on the Gentleman 3 and Gentleman 1 thing. I'll look at both of them again tomorrow.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:23 pm
by Gentleman 6
More sure on G3 town than G1 scum. But G1 should be scum.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:23 pm
by Gentleman 6
More sure on G3 town than G1 scum. But G1 should be scum.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:35 pm
by Gentleman 5
L2 is deathtunnelling me make it stop.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:36 pm
by Gentleman 5
In post 3290, Lady 5 wrote:@FakeGod

Maybe Prod Gent 8?
Has he talked recently?

Anything of value?

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:44 pm
by Lady 2
In post 3294, Gentleman 5 wrote:L2 is deathtunnelling me make it stop.
Oh yeah I'm deathtunneling so hard I'm considering whether my partner and I need to be lynch #1 before you

no I'm just not buying your repeated attempts to link me to L5

like why does L5 scum = L2 scum

like you
actually
believe L5 is
bussing me
and this is a real evaluation of the gamestate???

I don't believe you actually do, I can't see a sincere reason for you to believe that but I guess I'll hear you out if you want to explain. Couldn't hurt.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:52 pm
by Gentleman 5
Repeated? I guess twice is repeated, so ok lol.

Its more based on that empty threat you made to L5, “vote me then.”

Its just so hollow and empty people could probably mistake it for G6’s heart.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:55 pm
by Gentleman 5
Honestly Im only half-invested in this game.

Im just bullshitting around until Im honestly needed for questioning or L4 drops me.

I wouldnt take anything Ive been doing today super seriously.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:57 pm
by Gentleman 5
In post 2967, Lady 2 wrote:
In post 2963, Lady 5 wrote:Town G8 doesn’t choose L2.
Scum G8 chooses Town L2.
Scum G8 doesn’t choose Scum L2.

There!
It’s more clear now! :)
if you believe that

vote me
No one gives a fuck when I give a reason. Ill just tell it to the wall.

This can only be said for show. Seems fake.

Shade I know. Just call me littlefinger its all I do apparently