Tierce is Town. Tierce is waiting eagerly to see where this leads, though!
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 8:20 pm
by elleheathen
In post 3297, Tammy wrote:I'm guessing no she's not since you're asking the question and she's basically acquiesced that whatever the hell you're alluding to is correct, I'm taking that as a scum claim so just out whatever fucking results you have and stop playing fucking games I don't have the damn patience for.
Wow, take a chill pill.
You're my biggest townread. I asked you because I wanted your damn opinion. MY BAD.
And the reason I chose those four people to ask specifically, was because
they're my biggest townreads
and I wanted to know about their read on Tierce given that.
Because if Tierce is town - you need to kill me.
So no, ooba - I'm not concerned about being NK'ed. Because it benefits town for me to die if Tierce is town.
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 8:23 pm
by Tierce
...You're the one who targeted me N1, aren't you?
Oh, you
genius
.
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 8:33 pm
by elleheathen
Yes, because:
I'm Ygritte. Aligned with the realm.
Most important of my abilities: I'm a fixed and permanent roleblocker.
You know nothing.
Guess who I targetted?
Tierce.
Which was part of my disengaging - because it was in the last day that I saw Tierce as town.
You need to kill me.
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 8:37 pm
by ooba
That's not as bad as I thought it would be. Does your target know that you roleblocked em?
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 8:38 pm
by ooba
In post 3304, ooba wrote:Does your target know that you roleblocked em?
i.e. Would your target be notified that they were roleblocked?
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 8:38 pm
by Shadoweh
It's what happens when you're popular. Everyone targets you for hugs and shiny gold coins.
Titus: What part of 'traditionally Faraday games have daytalk' did you not understand.All the previous Games of Thrones had daytalk.
Cut. ...Wow. Just out of curiousity, does your shitty power tell the person you targetted that they're roleblocked forever?
GOD DAMNIT OOBA I ASKED FIRST
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 8:40 pm
by Tierce
In post 3304, ooba wrote:Does your target know that you roleblocked em
Oh yes. I've been bullshitting like a pro.
Which means I have no clue what happened last Night with that missing kill and that was why I was so intent on what SafetyDance had done.
Glad to know I'm not losing it and can still read some people at least...
Oh you.
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 9:12 pm
by ooba
Anybody who comes out and says "Kill\Lynch me" earns townie points.
Unvote
And regarding Tierce, I still think she's town. If elle's role had worked on N1, it might have changed things but since it was
after
N1, I think Tierce's claim of being the one shot holds good. (Unless they're both scum together but that would be a stupid gambit to play considering current game state)
In post 2908, Tierce wrote:
I have a shared Bulletproof ability. X times during the game, I can shield myself and one other player (remember Night 1? I do!). And I know where that kill MUST go. I can protect Syryana and myself for the next
two
Nights.
So give it over. This girl has quite the name to whisper~
In post 2908, Tierce wrote:I have a shared Bulletproof ability. X times during the game, I can shield myself and one other player (remember Night 1? I do!). And I know where that kill MUST go. I can protect Syryana and myself for the next
two
Nights.
So give it over. This girl has quite the name to whisper~
waitwut?
It's called gambiting, love.
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 9:27 pm
by kanyeknowsbest
i just got a lot happier w. my vote.
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 9:34 pm
by ooba
This is from yesterday's notes:
@Quadz:
In post 2305, you end it with "My vote stays for now. (I am not jumping on a growing Ooba wagon, guys, this is how bad I think Spy's hammer was.)"
Let's set this in context. I have been your top suspect right from the start of D1. So you passing up on the rising wagon of Shadow+PnJ - obviously means you really thought that SpyreX was really scummy.
In 2355, obviously your thoughts on SpyreX really haven't changed much as noted by these lines:
- "This reasoning can go jump off a goddamned bridge. Unless his power is "hammer a dude or two and WIN GAME," it's not worth hammering someone you cannot possibly have a read on."
- "Also, show me examples of you taking that opportunity in the past, or expressing willingness to do so. Forgive me if I don't just take your word for it."
But you remove your vote from SpyreX and then proceed to vote Nacho.
^I wrote the above post after 2355. But I rationalised it could be a vote for pressure too - after all - you did call Nacho a weaker scummy read. And I realised the easy way to figure out if your SpyreX=scum convictions were faked was to see how you played after that. (so I never posted this)
So, in short,
- Quadz thought I was scum for most of the game (D1,D2,D3)
- But voted SpreX because he thought SpyreX's hammer was that bad (He even ignored a starting wagon on me)
- Quadz procceds to vote Nacho because he didnt give reasons for those he called scum (flimsy jump off from the SpyreX wagon when it was at 8 votes)
- Quadz proceeds to vote the Alchemist
- Quadz is vehement that Alchemist is scum and never moves back to the SpyreX wagon
- D4 starts, there's ZERO mention of the Alchemist
- Quadz votes SafetyDance
Bunch of opportunistic votes and both his SpyreX=scum conviction and Alchemist=scum conviction appear faked.
