Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2018 1:41 pm
only vt in the setup=token VT. Doesn't matter if they were informed or not but I like that. Its like a fake claim cop.
Creature what was this answering if it wasn’t a scumslip?
Lol yeah let's tell scum they're safe by getting all invests on me. You're either dumb or scum.
In post 3304, Varsoon wrote:...is it really a role madness game if you're a VT, though?
In post 3321, Varsoon wrote:inb4 Cheeky Godfather
All of my games don't.In post 3314, Nero Cain wrote:TBF, token VTs in a role madness are a thing. Not that I believe Hebi but with as much modding exp. as you have I'm surprised you'd think this.In post 3304, Varsoon wrote:...is it really a role madness game if you're a VT, though?
I think VT's a bum role to give someone in a game full of other roles.
Hell, even in my Varsoon Mafia game, the VT was informed that they were the only VT in setup.
So what if we were to tell you that if Hebichan is actually a VT then there are at least TWO VT's this game?In post 3323, Varsoon wrote:Nah, it was an informed-anti-fake-claim role.
Nice dodge.In post 3333, Nero Cain wrote:Says the person that thinks I'm being at all serious. I don't think any town would actually believe that I'm pushing for all investigations on you.
I don't get how this applies to the situation.In post 3334, Varsoon wrote:Cheeky, the only people who care about cops being on them are scum and millers.
I like how you are saying things to try and make me look scummy but if anyone was actually reading the conversation they'd know that I'm not dodging anything and that you are posting strongly worded bullshit.In post 3336, CheekyTeeky wrote:Nice dodge.In post 3333, Nero Cain wrote:Says the person that thinks I'm being at all serious. I don't think any town would actually believe that I'm pushing for all investigations on you.
You're a pal. I'm very caught, very caught indeed. Good job everyone. I just walked right into the trap.In post 3339, RCEnigma wrote:Don't let this distract you from the fact that DGB is caught scum.
there's a guilty on Hebi. Why are you not calling that scum?In post 3340, RCEnigma wrote:RR can you claim 3p so we can just Lynch scum today?
For real? How did I miss that.In post 3343, Nero Cain wrote:there's a guilty on Hebi. Why are you not calling that scum?In post 3340, RCEnigma wrote:RR can you claim 3p so we can just Lynch scum today?
No, you’re the one who’s being “dense” here. Toogeloo had never voted, so hammering back’s up his claim. Otherwise, it looks like he made up a role as an excuse for not voting.In post 3185, davesaz wrote:Toog votes, a hammer happens, day ends.In post 3169, DrewVa wrote:In post 3157, davesaz wrote:I don't know how many times it has to be said that Toog hammering would have done nothing to confirm him other than to prove he had a vote.In post 3116, DrewVa wrote:No, himIn post 3084, RCEnigma wrote:I didn't imply you wanted to Lynch RR, but if you don't then why are we still talking about Toog. Does it suck that he was forced to flip? Yes. Did I want him to flip today? Without a case predicated on Clemencys self vote...maybe. but that wasn't strong enough for me to want to flip him today.
Is it better that he flipped himself early rather than let town Duke it out on who's right or wrong, waste a large portion of the day, and miss out on hunting the ACTUAL scum connections? Imo yes.hammeringactual scum, would have been the best thing for town, because then he’d be confirmed and still alive and we’d have lynched scum.
Beginning to wonder if this is scum trying to push a false narrative.
How is it a false narrative? It would have confirmed his role. By confirming his role, he gobal doc claim would have been far more likely to be believed.
My townlean on you just plummeted.Nothing would have beenI'm having trouble believing anyone can be this dense.confirmedby that.
Even if you're trying to say that hammeringscumwould make him "town" that fails the most basic logic tests too by assuming that scum can't/won't hammer and ignorming the near certainty that the game is MB.
I guess proficiency at logic is not AI, but jury's out on whether refusing to listen to the superior logic of others is.
No reaction tests are really useful because it’s difficult to fake a reaction. I don’t often do them but when I have, they’ve never been wrong - not even once.In post 3205, hebichan wrote:Which is why reaction tests are bullshit and I'm not going to police myself to react however the hell MS wants me to.In post 3203, Reasonably Rational wrote:A hundred pages ago! And nothing you've done since then is actually interesting, so your bad reaction is *still* bad. *shrug*In post 3196, hebichan wrote:So you're pushing me based on barely post RVS stuff from hundreds of pages ago? Huh.
Thought more people would be voting me based off my bad toog push there.
VOTE: RR
Honestly, Nah fuck your slot.
-Cerb
But I honestly think you're scum anyhow, so kay.
I'm really suspicious of the fact that RR did not consider this very simple explanation and went in guns blazing and only "reconsidered" after creature explained. Not very rational actions. Very careless in fact. Especially that creature often talks to himself because he posts in his chopped up spam posting style.In post 3286, Reasonably Rational wrote:Like, if creature is literally just talking to himself, and not actually completing any of his thoughts? :-/ I guess it could be a not-scum thing. *sigh*
-Cerb