Mafiascum.net

In post 3318, Fun and Games wrote:1. Chainsaw of enchant? So you're positing that we're scum with enchant?
2. He's repeatedly putting words in my mouth and reframing what i'm saying in the worst possible light. He did ghe former 20 minutes ago on the prior page, for example
3. I thought the whole premise of ur issue with our vp push is that we look like we're bussing him

~ skitter

In post 3323, Fun and Games wrote:

In post 3319, Dwlee99 wrote:Hydra read: town!Pooky/skitter would have had that conversation

We didnt, and we're town, and I imagine id i were scum with enchant someone would have pointed that out to me before i start defending him

~ skitter

In post 3324, Fun and Games wrote:

In post 3317, Dwlee99 wrote:White flag mafia Enchant hammered his scum buddy super "lol"y, something Pooky should remember given he lost in ELO by thinking Enchant was town

i spent most of wfm saying enchant was scum and nobody listened to me

i changed my mind at elo because my subconcious trolled me with a dream about a talking dolphin

at no point did i think enchant was town cuz he lol hammered a teammate

In post 3284, Fun and Games wrote:

In post 3282, VP Baltar wrote:You're being ridiculous to say scum would never take a flail maneuver to shake heat they are getting for their play.

Hi just gonna point out that this yet again anothet thing i didnt say

~ skitter

In post 3325, Dwlee99 wrote:1.) Possibly, but I think chainsaws are scummy regardless of the person being defended's alignment.

In post 3322, Enchant wrote:Like really, there's almost zero mafia motivation in all my moves.

Unless i am superbusseridiot.

In post 3327, Dwlee99 wrote:But now skitter is saying scum!enchant wouldn't be trolly

In post 3330, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 3322, Enchant wrote:Like really, there's almost zero mafia motivation in all my moves.

Unless i am superbusseridiot.

You were the last vote? That's a supremely weak bus

In post 3328, Fun and Games wrote:

In post 3284, Fun and Games wrote:

In post 3282, VP Baltar wrote:You're being ridiculous to say scum would never take a flail maneuver to shake heat they are getting for their play.

Hi just gonna point out that this yet again anothet thing i didnt say

~ skitter

Right here dwlee, right here

~ skitter

In post 3329, Fun and Games wrote:

In post 3325, Dwlee99 wrote:1.) Possibly, but I think chainsaws are scummy regardless of the person being defended's alignment.

Chainsaw requires the defended person being scum by definition, no?

~ skitter

In post 3321, Enchant wrote:

In post 3314, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 3313, Enchant wrote:town evidence on me.

What's the town evidence on you?

"Prove you are town"

MY ROLE IS GREEN

In post 3333, Fun and Games wrote:

In post 3330, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 3322, Enchant wrote:Like really, there's almost zero mafia motivation in all my moves.

Unless i am superbusseridiot.

You were the last vote? That's a supremely weak bus

at least hes voted for scum unlike you and dwlee

In post 3330, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 3322, Enchant wrote:Like really, there's almost zero mafia motivation in all my moves.

Unless i am superbusseridiot.

You were the last vote? That's a supremely weak bus

In post 3301, Fun and Games wrote:Enchant isnt the sort of player to utilize 'reverse psychology' as scum. Like your reasoning makes some level of sense if he's the sort of player to think out his every play but that's not how he's playing. He's impulsive and troll-y. That's exactly the sort of player that lolclaims scum

And i think its really silly to suggest that he saw gamma get into trouble for playing that way and then *choosing to play that way* anyways, just why

Also i've actually seen scum-enchant play, and he took the game rather seriously and less troll-y than he's doung here

@ vp

~ skitter

In post 3334, Dwlee99 wrote:Okay that's hyperbolic > >

In post 3328, Fun and Games wrote:

In post 3284, Fun and Games wrote:

In post 3282, VP Baltar wrote:You're being ridiculous to say scum would never take a flail maneuver to shake heat they are getting for their play.

Hi just gonna point out that this yet again anothet thing i didnt say

~ skitter

Lol OK. Sorry for stating clearly the exact thing you were saying without leaving mealy mouthed caveats in there.
Right here dwlee, right here

~ skitter

In post 3327, Dwlee99 wrote:But now skitter is saying scum!enchant wouldn't be trolly

In post 3342, Fun and Games wrote:dwlee and vpb strategy is just spam so much nonsense until town stops reading and just let them mis elim enchant

In post 3340, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 3328, Fun and Games wrote:

In post 3284, Fun and Games wrote:

In post 3282, VP Baltar wrote:You're being ridiculous to say scum would never take a flail maneuver to shake heat they are getting for their play.

Hi just gonna point out that this yet again anothet thing i didnt say

~ skitter

Lol OK. Sorry for stating clearly the exact thing you were saying without leaving mealy mouthed caveats in there.
Right here dwlee, right here

~ skitter

In post 3344, Fun and Games wrote:

In post 3340, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 3328, Fun and Games wrote:

In post 3284, Fun and Games wrote:

In post 3282, VP Baltar wrote:You're being ridiculous to say scum would never take a flail maneuver to shake heat they are getting for their play.

Hi just gonna point out that this yet again anothet thing i didnt say

~ skitter

Lol OK. Sorry for stating clearly the exact thing you were saying without leaving mealy mouthed caveats in there.
Right here dwlee, right here

~ skitter

You're putting words in my mouth, but ok
I did not write my post as an absolute, and you threw it back at me as if i made a broad statement abt soemthing scum would always or never do, and are trying to defend that point, which is significantly easier

~ skitter

In post 3346, VP Baltar wrote:Anyhow, this is a pointless argument.