I just really think this feels like the hiplop I've seen before in other games, and he's even more motivated and is trying harder than in the other games I've played with him too. He really seems like he's trying to actually find and lynch scum and it just feels really, really town to me.
This seems what
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:37 am
by hiplop
I mean gamma is right about day one. Day two ive been slacky
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:37 am
by hiplop
Also gamma i agree on moi. Everything yoh said was spot on
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:50 am
by Spiffeh
@mod hiplop is voting for DiamondSentinel
Noted -Mod
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 10:19 am
by DiamondSentinel
In post 664, Cephrir wrote:-super long quote trim-
I mean okay if anyone else here wants to speak up and say they've had meaningful interactions with kdowns then by all means do so. Why would I say this if it weren't true.
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 10:33 am
by Cephrir
Those sure are the words that I wrote!
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 11:17 am
by SnowStorm
The people voting MoI, what do you think of his interactions with Imperium?
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 12:44 pm
by SnarkySnowman
I'm like 95% sure the top two wagons atm are town guys.
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 1:56 pm
by Grib
Oh right, Snarky is scum.
UNVOTE: VOTE: Snarky
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 2:03 pm
by Transcend
I lean towards no, but I'm not gonna defend him too hard.
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:29 pm
by hiplop
VOTE: SNARK
look at imperium's posts about snarky. nacho wasnt in danger and was hard defending the snowman
In post 889, hiplop wrote:shes doing a lot of "im skimming" posts but the ones that are there also look real bad to me
im in a sort of internal struggle between very likely scum-snarky that I can't read and someone I'm sorta confident in ya know
i do not know a single person that can read snarky
i do know many people who have been convinced that this is the moment that they can, that this is the time they finally can stare into snarky's soul and expose him as scum
it doesn't work out
In post 923, Imperium wrote:and i think this is the only player that i've played with that this holds true for
if i have a bunch of townreads elsewhere that i feel good about then sure it's snarky time but otherwise probably not, regardless of case
In post 923, Imperium wrote:and i think this is the only player that i've played with that this holds true for
if i have a bunch of townreads elsewhere that i feel good about then sure it's snarky time but otherwise probably not, regardless of case
Can you read me, Nacho/Tammy (I don't know which one this is). I don't think you can. Very few can read me consistently.
this is something that many people have also said before
it doesn't often hold true, though
There's a difference between promising a catch-up and then not delivering and saying you're caught up -x number of pages when you're not.
There's also a difference between that and feigning outrage when you get called out on it.
If you'd come back to the game and been like "eh sorry yeah I did miss things during my catch-up" then I would maybe be re-evaluating, but you're literally digging your heels in and selectively throwing shade and it just feels dishonest.
last time i played with snarky he said he read the whole game in about 17 minutes and then showed a complete lack of awareness on the rest of the game except for ~5 posts before his readslist
he was town town town
and yeah i can get that him lying about something like this and then when being called out on lying digging his heels in and being more ridiculous is frustrating, but, again, i don't think it's particularly alignment indicative because it's snarky. there's plenty of room for you on this michael jordan wagon, though.
these are all scum defense of a partner.
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:55 pm
by Zulfy
Hiplop while you are here blowing off I would like you to answer two things:
1) Why was DS 'unfortunate town'?
2) How are you confscum?
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:56 pm
by Zulfy
In post 3364, Transcend wrote:I lean towards no, but I'm not gonna defend him too hard.
+1
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:58 pm
by Firebringer
In post 3350, DiamondSentinel wrote:How did I strawman you? I was agreeing with your earlier statement from when you were scumreading Spiffeh.
You were basically saying that I was saying all your reads were people who agree with you.
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:59 pm
by Firebringer
Get on the snowstorm train, its leaving the station.
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 4:23 pm
by Zulfy
Spoiler: SnowStorm checking DiamondSentinel and DiamondSentinel reaction
THIS IS EXACTLY THE SORT OF BS THAT HAPPENED IN MACHINA WHERE SOMEONE HAD A "GUILTY" ON SOMEONE ELSE AND WE HAMMERED THEM IN UNDER 24 HOURS!
I DON'T KNOW HOW THIS WILL TURN OUT, BUT THAT TIME IT WAS A FUCKING GAMBIT. 2 TOWN DIED BECAUSE OF THAT BULLSHIT PLAY.
This is not a bad reaction. It is probably the most natural of the reactions I saw. Like he has said, FB is known for gambiting. There was no reason to 100% believe or deny the guilty, the only way to know if FB was telling the truth was for him to fully claim. These posts and DS's further explanation/defense of his thought process here all align with how I'd expect someone who's both played and hydra'd with FB to react.
Oh, thank you for linking that. I had been taking what FB had said at face value, like I bet so many were.
Yeah, he's downright lying about me talking like I "knew it was fake"
VOTE: Firebringer
Liars get rope, especially as blatant a lie as this.
+1 here because I find it odd that DiamondSentinel is accepting SnowStorm's assertion that DiamondSentinel said what he said in these two quoted posts because he thinks Firebringer is a habitual gambiter. To me it seems like he said what he said in these two posts because he doesn't want a quicklynch on an uncomfirmed guilty.
Hello this is Zulfy from a different point in time and space. DiamondSentinel does say that Firebringer gambits in another post, but I still find it odd that he doesn't clarify which is his primary point.
And he turned out to be exactly right. Firebringer does not have a guilty on Spiffeh.
However yea plus one like I said.
Spoiler: Broseidon Broseidon
I found this post while looking for it, because Broseidon said:
In post 3102, BROseidon wrote:
His response to FB's fake guilty on Spiffeh is super bullshit - it looks like DS preparing for an inno flip because "omg Spiffeh/camntsuki so town by play." Like, that's never a reason to not trust or discredit a guilty result because people have wrong reads all the time, and not having self-awareness of that is obviously not a realistic thing to expect.
"Preparing for an inno flip" to me reads like "anticipating that the quicklynch will go through."
DiamondSentinel did not want that quicklynch to go through.
"'Omg Spiffeh/camntsuki so town by play.'"
DiamondSentinel was more focused on previous experiences than any personal read he might have had on Spiffeh.
This is, therefore, a blatant misrepresentation. Two. +2 Broseidon.
In post 3102, BROseidon wrote:
His play in the game has, in general, been disruptive and non-productive. His reads are relatively static, and he doesn't seem to take into consideration new information.
I haven't been really looking at that but I will.
In post 3102, BROseidon wrote:Plus he just says a lot of incredibly dumb shit that I wouldn't expect town to say on questioning fairly fundamental theory points
I did read this a bit though, let me go look it up.
--Please hold--
Well at first you do say
In post 1327, BROseidon wrote:Fuck if I can read DS - someone please just put a bullet through it so I don't have to care.
But your frustration with him is consistent enough for me to see how you can end up with the read you say you have.
Though your constant bickering reads like theater, a crutch to help you get to that read.
Who knows.
Thank you for pointing me to that post, Broseidon.
And that does it for me tonight folks.
And by the way! Grib you did say you would elaborate on your read on hiplop once I told you my read on him. Please follow through.