Page 135 of 192
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 9:55 am
by Dwlee99
Agreed on PT cop + masons making sense
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 9:56 am
by VFP
Gamma, are you only claiming odd night PT cop?
No other modifiers, correct?
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 10:01 am
by Dragon of the West
bleeeeeeeeeeeeehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
VOTE: StD
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 10:02 am
by VFP
I want to clarify this is not me saying that I think Gamma is town.
I still think with the fake meta, trying to hammer and lack of anything to suggest Dragon was a check that Gamma is plausible scum here.
The way Nom posts back to Raith day1 outside of what Dwlee posted though is a good indicator that they aren't direct scum together. The post that took my fancy the most was when Raoth says Nom and Osuka were scum, Nom replies back concerning Osuka. That seems odd from scum to do.
Maybe Gamma is a traitor here telling his scum buddy(s) and Dragons is just scum.
It would be strange for traitor Raith to only name Nom and Osuka and not scum Dragons in the mentioned post above. So I'm unsure here.
The swapping between Osuka, and going against Nom, voting Nom seems out of place as a direct scum team.
Regardless, Gamma is traitor scum if scum.
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 10:03 am
by VFP
Why are you voting someone with a confirmed check on them?
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 10:08 am
by Dwlee99
In post 3354, VFP wrote:
Why are you voting someone with a confirmed check on them?
Seconding this?
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 10:10 am
by VFP
So I'm happy with the town pool of.
DGB, DotW, Dwlee, Chaos
Knocking on the door
Andre, T3, SSBM
To be sorted
Anya, Gamma, Dragons
Left
Titus
Who does Titus make sense as scum with here?
We also have to consider the possibility of all the roles as town. Before hand when Titus was advising that the JK was basically just there for Cyrus didn't match up.
If the PT cop is real, this stops checks on scum as well, right? If self targeted.
So in that sense it favours Gamma.
I'm not sure I like a Titus / Anya team though.
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 10:11 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 3351, VFP wrote:Gamma, are you only claiming odd night PT cop?
No other modifiers, correct?
yes
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 10:12 am
by VFP
Favours as town, not scum.
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 10:12 am
by Dwlee99
Jailkeeper doesn't stop checks, that would be a rolestopper iirc. Jailkeeper would directly block the PT cop from getting a check.
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 10:17 am
by VFP
In post 3359, Dwlee99 wrote:Jailkeeper doesn't stop checks, that would be a rolestopper iirc. Jailkeeper would directly block the PT cop from getting a check.
Ah okay, yes.
I still think it favours the claim. It does also discredit Anya's claim to a degree.
If Anya is scum and Gamma is town, Gamma is dead tonight anyway (obviously not limited to this though).
Do you think scum Titus just sits and bus here?
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 10:18 am
by VFP
Gamma having lack of modifiers doesn't favour town Gamma here though.
What exactly did Titus claim?
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 10:19 am
by Dwlee99
Busses who? Dragons or?
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 10:19 am
by Dragon of the West
Brain fart. I reverted my vote back to who it was on before Anya without thinking because it's been made clear we're giving Gamma the night to investigate Anya so Anya's not getting limmed. Should've unvoted or done this:
VOTE: Andres
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 10:19 am
by Dwlee99
Titus claimed babysitter enabler
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 10:21 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 2810, Rathe wrote:so u dont think the designers made the enabler be opposite alignments
In post 2811, Rathe wrote:i was a mailman enabler in a game that had only scum mailman
btw who were these @
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 10:21 am
by VFP
Titus, just to confirm you have no other modifiers, correct?
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 10:23 am
by VFP
In post 2796, Dwlee99 wrote:Also maybe Titus' role is town because punishing a scum elimination with a ungated vigilante seems cruel
I guess this?
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 10:24 am
by Gamma Emerald
yeah I think Titus is town
I BELIEVE VFP and kyouko should know why
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 10:25 am
by VFP
I have no idea why.
Tell me.
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 10:25 am
by Dragon of the West
In post 2813, Dwlee99 wrote: In post 2810, Rathe wrote:so u dont think the designers made the enabler be opposite alignments
Typically when an enabler acts on a different alignment's role it would be to reduce its power. So, for instance, the town mailman enabler disables scum mailman, decreasing the power. This idea is good because it can reduce swing in a setup by making a role gated in some way. For instance, if town cop catches the cop enabler mafia role, then the cop gets disabled and can't catch anyone else.
In this case, the enabler actually makes the role
stronger
. Before, the babysitter was effectively a visitor with a kill if the babysitter died. When the enabler dies, the role becomes an ungated vigilante. If the enabler was scum, this would make the setup extremely swingy as now if the enabler dies, the mafia are not only down a player but also unleashed a vigilante onto the game.
this was Dwlee's response to that Rathe post
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 10:26 am
by Dwlee99
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 10:27 am
by Dwlee99
Site deleted my reply: as DotW said, me
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 10:27 am
by Gamma Emerald
okay
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2021 10:29 am
by Gamma Emerald
no. figure it out yourself. StD should also know, but I forgot to mention him because I had this citation in mind already when looking at those two Rathe posts and my reason I was going to cite it was because I was thinking those were @ StD in which case I was gonna call StD out a bit on an oversight