Mafiascum.net

In post 3349, Frozen Angel wrote:Unless if you statistically prove it with a sufficient data on a population/site meta.

wasn't there that peer reviewed scientific paper that proved that those who replace out on mafiascum dot net are 6% more likely to be scum

In post 3347, fireisredsir wrote:mod can't ever accept a surrender like that from maf and not from town cause that breaks the game. so no one should have thought the game was over

I am not talking about technicalities. I am talking about the human reaction. No one else dared vote me on the spot cuz that's how a town mind usually work. When you get shocked by a scum claim (especially the last scum) like that your mind pauses or freezes for a little time trying to evaluate the unexpected situation. It wouldn't have been as suspicious if Andante had waited for a few hours and then said something like "eh.. let's end the game then" and voted me.

In post 3349, Frozen Angel wrote:

In post 3344, Eyes without a face wrote:So 2 out of 3 scums were replaced vs 4 out of 10 town?? Nah.. never go for replacement. That's a bad theory evidently.

GG

still an awful theory.

Unless if you statistically prove it with a sufficient data on a population/site meta.

I don't have to. IT IS NOT MY OWN DOING. It's DGB's and DGB has been around much much longer than me

In post 3350, Datisi wrote:

In post 3349, Frozen Angel wrote:Unless if you statistically prove it with a sufficient data on a population/site meta.

wasn't there that peer reviewed scientific paper that proved that those who replace out on mafiascum dot net are 6% more likely to be scum

im pretty sure there have been at least 2 MD topics about it and the general conclusion was that scum replace out more often than town

Thanks for the game! In the dead thread we all kinda thought Andante was the last scum.

In post 3353, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 3350, Datisi wrote:

In post 3349, Frozen Angel wrote:Unless if you statistically prove it with a sufficient data on a population/site meta.

wasn't there that peer reviewed scientific paper that proved that those who replace out on mafiascum dot net are 6% more likely to be scum

im pretty sure there have been at least 2 MD topics about it and the general conclusion was that scum replace out more often than town

will be good if you send me the link to them. I wonder if it had statistical significance.

called it

In post 911, wavemode wrote:it's such an abrupt shift that in the back of my mind I would not be surprised if umlaut was scum and they just agreed in their daychat that scorp should bus him

like it's such a sudden and random push for seemingly no reason at all

gg boys

Well, except I don't recall ever agreeing on that. But yes we were both scum, sure.

In post 3356, wavemode wrote:called it

In post 911, wavemode wrote:it's such an abrupt shift that in the back of my mind I would not be surprised if umlaut was scum and they just agreed in their daychat that scorp should bus him

like it's such a sudden and random push for seemingly no reason at all

gg boys

lets be real. Stephen hits different keys and you're not quoting yourself here..

but you DID win and we lost, so GG for sure..

In post 71, Stephen A Smith wrote:


Dwlee earning his #1 spot.

My list is fluid

You too can be great.

2/3 isnt bad for a troll list on replace in ngl

gg, wp pooky, fun game to play in past d2, sad i got condemmed tho

dang i have never been so happy to be wrong!

gg all, nice hammer Stephen, thanks for modding datisi

scum pt has been released, thanks for playing everyone!