Mafiascum.net

In post 3361, Garruk Relentless wrote:

Unvote

Willing to lynch both AGar and quadz, Titus is just being Titus.

Agars a good lynch... Titus has been town town town.

safetydun is fucfking insane.

In post 3374, Benmage wrote:

In post 3368, Tierce wrote:Worked well enough.

The kill did what it needed to do,

elle is obvTown at this point and it's quite probable I did soak up a kill on N1.

How so?

Hit its target. Told you I know things; let it lie for now.

VOTE: quadz08

But you just claimed your not BP... and whats the point in not naming whose name you used... or how you got said name..

and

and..

and.....

I don't like being in the dark.

(you can't tell kids to wait on Christmas morning godddamnittttt)

In post 3358, Tierce wrote:Syryana: do you know the flavor name alone, or do you happen to know the player name?

I know the flavor name only. As well as the fact that name does not exist in the game.

In post 3378, Benmage wrote:But you just claimed your not BP... and whats the point in not naming whose name you used... or how you got said name..

and

and..

and.....

I don't like being in the dark.

(you can't tell kids to wait on Christmas morning godddamnittttt)

Pretty obvious I got that name from my abilities. And the game being larger than you, it is fairly likely I have a failsafe somewhere, ?

Worry not. Go eat some leftover candy.

PEdit: well then. Let me get the laptop and I have a few things to say.

In post 3381, Tierce wrote:I have a few things to say.

I look forward to it.

Alrighty.

Among my abilities were the knowledge that if a certain character was in the game, this character would not be aligned with the Realm. So unlike what seems pretty much anyone else, I did have something to do with a kill that would target players by their character name, not by the player name itself. I was also told that this character, if they were in the game, would be one-shot killproof--including lynches and other means of killing. Which meant that I was obviously unsurprised by the lack of dying last Night--I just intended to bring the scumbag down a notch to .

No such luck. Still think it was worth a shot.

And I would thank you if you didn't share the name with the class, Syr. We know this person is not in the game and would not be aligned with the Realm if it were, so we're going to see if by any chance scum decide to use fakeclaims (yes, in a uPick), because hitting this name as a fakeclaim would be delightful.

In post 3383, Tierce wrote:And I would thank you if you didn't share the name with the class, Syr. We know this person is not in the game and would not be aligned with the Realm if it were, so we're going to see if by any chance scum decide to use fakeclaims (yes, in a uPick), because hitting this name as a fakeclaim would be delightful.

I agree. Hence why I remained silent when you mentioned talking about last night not being particularly fruitful.

SafetyDance I don't give a fig who you're voting right now. Just stop talking about your dumb role and talk about scumreads. I'm not voting you either, I have a policy of lynching scum not idiots. Setting you on fire would improve everyone's quality of life though and it is soooo tempting.

Now let's lynch quadz. ^_^/

Also Tierce I wish you'd stop explaining your role, gambits are so much cooler. Since your magical coin Trevor failed though who would you kill instead?

In post 3348, Tierce wrote: As it is, since I was not vanillized by SCUM on N1, I'm fairly sure I was already shot by them and that a missing kill last Night came from somewhere else.

If this is TrueFax, then we need to lynch Titus.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Titus



Because I'm persistent and this is pissing me off, here's a timeline for SD's claim/strongman/ninja bullshit:


Post #2457 - SD says "Unless Naut is a ninja, he's didn't do anything [Night 2]. Implication is a track of Naut.

Post #3058 - SD tells us quadz didn't visit anyone Night 3.
Post #3080 - "And I didn't claim to use the trackyesterday, I used Snare/Block. Naut didn't do any killing or anything at all just like last night quadz didn't go anywhere."
Post #3085 - "Ninja's avoid detection, which is how Naut would avoid being detected doing anything night 2."

HOW IS THIS SO HARD TO SEE.

Titus, then SD, then Naut.

Fucking. Success.

AGar, why are you not voting SD after just explaining the fact that he blatantly contradicted himself? It's not even like you're saying "HE'S TOWN AND JUST CONFUSED OR SOME SHIT" because you say we should lynch him tomorrow.

splain yourself.

In post 3388, quadz08 wrote:AGar, why are you not voting SD after just explaining the fact that he blatantly contradicted himself? It's not even like you're saying "HE'S TOWN AND JUST CONFUSED OR SOME SHIT" because you say we should lynch him tomorrow.

splain yourself.

Read the point before my vote swap.

Then read it again.

I'm not gonna splain.

In post 3336, Benmage wrote:

@Elle

if your target dies, can you RB again?

Yes.

In post 3339, Titus wrote:^^^ I want to know that as well.

I have never seen a permanent rber. It makes much more sense to include a vanillaizer than a permanent rber unless we are looking at a spree killer. Also why use it until you are convinced someone is not town aligned? Please don't take this as being hostile, I do believe the claim (can't see elle willing to be suicidal over it). Elle just makes sense as town. Were you compulsive n1 elle?

My role is all flavor - so it doesn't specifically say 'fixed and permanent roleblocker' but that was just what I associated it with based on what it does/what I know of roles. Wasn't familiar with a vanillaizer at the time, though I've wiki'ed it now. Vanillaizer makes sense since it didn't take effect until the following night. So idk?

I was about as convinced as Tierce scum on D1 as I could get - it didn't really change until mid D3. Yeah, I debated waiting until I was positive - but I also figured that if there was a reason that was that positive on someone as scum, other people would be too and they'd just be lynched.

It was a risk - I took it.

Except people can read me here and I have something like four or five players vouching for me as Town. Feels nice! (...unlike my scum games...)

AGar, I really want to go after quadz after that post of his.

UNVOTE: quadz08
VOTE: Titus

In post 3391, Tierce wrote:Except people can read me here and I have something like four or five players vouching for me as Town. Feels nice! (...unlike my scum games...)

AGar, I really want to go after quadz after that post of his.

UNVOTE: quadz08
VOTE: Titus

The most recent one?

Yeah that gives me a huge sad.

But Titus needs to die first.

I still think something is off regarding this Tierce/elle thing. Yet I think they are both town trying to hide something they think hiding will improve things for us. This puts me in the odd position of trusting them generally but trusting nothing they say. This is a short leash at least until I have time to sit down and read this game.

Benmage, if you think Agar is so scummy, why vote The Alchemist?

For the record, I think SD is a better lynch than Quadz. SD will not give a straight answer to anything, which I only see benefitting a scum PR. Tierce and Elle are being candid with their stuff just withholding but being honest about it. Quadz is just buddying anything that walks but SD and Agar.

In post 3390, elleheathen wrote:

In post 3336, Benmage wrote:

@Elle

if your target dies, can you RB again?

Yes.

In post 3339, Titus wrote:^^^ I want to know that as well.

I have never seen a permanent rber. It makes much more sense to include a vanillaizer than a permanent rber unless we are looking at a spree killer. Also why use it until you are convinced someone is not town aligned? Please don't take this as being hostile, I do believe the claim (can't see elle willing to be suicidal over it). Elle just makes sense as town. Were you compulsive n1 elle?

My role is all flavor - so it doesn't specifically say 'fixed and permanent roleblocker' but that was just what I associated it with based on what it does/what I know of roles. Wasn't familiar with a vanillaizer at the time, though I've wiki'ed it now. Vanillaizer makes sense since it didn't take effect until the following night. So idk?

Ask the Mod if you can switch your RB target... and or if its some sort of vanillaizer... target/vanillaize someone new.

Context, I don't think Elle can Ben.

Also, I really want to know the answer to my last question.

It looks like this day is turning into another binary dichotomy. Even though Agar is completely right about SD contradicting himself and still doing it.

We can go for a pretty good case from someone I'm townreading strongly, against a player I've been very slightly scumreading all game.

Or we can go for an ambiguous hint of something from someone I'm not townreading as strongly, and who everyone else suspects (and so needs to pull something big if scum), against a slot I'm liking better than I was yesterday.

VOTE: quadz

At this rate all my serious suspects are going to survive the whole damn game.

Pre-empting hate on me for pointing out the breadcrumbish thing: It was really obvious, so shut up.

*sigh* I'm clearly missing something that everyone else is seeing. Whatever.

VOTE: quadz

No defense, no questions. Clearly caught scum here.