Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Thu Feb 23, 2017 2:02 pm**

I'm cool with letting more ppl talk

Posted: **Thu Feb 23, 2017 2:04 pm**

Anyways I'm heading home from work, so I'll catch up completely and answer your questions when I get home Almost

Posted: **Thu Feb 23, 2017 2:04 pm**

Leave him at L1, anyone who LOL hammers before the replacements chime in... well, they won't stand much of a chance come tomorrow.

Posted: **Thu Feb 23, 2017 3:51 pm**

technically my last vote was for the letter S (3346)
but I think it counted for James anyway
removing the chance of lolhammer
UNVOTE:

Posted: **Thu Feb 23, 2017 4:32 pm**

damn you, now I can't do a fake hammer.

Posted: **Thu Feb 23, 2017 4:35 pm**

I'm here, will post tonight or in the morning. Got a little work and RL to get smoothed out tonight.

Posted: **Fri Feb 24, 2017 12:10 am**

prodge.

I see James and Communication fighting, pretty sure there was some theory don't lynch cop claims or smth.
VOTE: Ram

Posted: **Fri Feb 24, 2017 12:14 am**

In post 3381, XnadrojX wrote:prodge.

I see James and Communication fighting, pretty sure there was some theory don't lynch cop claims or smth.
VOTE: Ram

so you want lynch claimed JK? do us a favor and replace out maybe, if you have no time for this

Posted: **Fri Feb 24, 2017 1:33 am**

XnadrojX is obviously not reading. Terrible town or scum.

I'll vote James whenever we are ready to end the day.

Ram's ridiculous position on James has him on my list of vote a voteables after James.

Posted: **Fri Feb 24, 2017 1:34 am**

In post 3383, havingfitz wrote:my list of voteables

EBWOP

Posted: **Fri Feb 24, 2017 1:48 am**

In post 3383, havingfitz wrote:XnadrojX is obviously not reading. Terrible town or scum.

I'll vote James whenever we are ready to end the day.

Ram's ridiculous position on James has him on my list of vote a voteables after James.

setting my lynch before having James flip?

And Xandroj is terrible town, not so terrible as scum, he's not getting lynched anytime soon

Posted: **Fri Feb 24, 2017 1:49 am**

In post 3385, Ramcius wrote:setting my lynch before having James flip?

Saying you are someone I would vote for. I.e. suspect.

Posted: **Fri Feb 24, 2017 2:08 am**

In post 3386, havingfitz wrote:
In post 3385, Ramcius wrote:setting my lynch before having James flip?
Saying you are someone I would vote for. I.e. suspect.

indeed, but my stance towards James didn't changed since my replacing in, so why you changed your stance towards me? Considering i claimed PR why would you want vote me anyway?

Posted: **Fri Feb 24, 2017 2:27 am**

In post 3387, Ramcius wrote:
In post 3386, havingfitz wrote:
In post 3385, Ramcius wrote:setting my lynch before having James flip?
Saying you are someone I would vote for. I.e. suspect.
indeed, but 1) my stance towards James didn't changed since my replacing in, so 2) why you changed your stance towards me? 3) Considering i claimed PR why would you want vote me anyway?

1 - the issue is your stance on James hasn't changed.

2 - you mean my earlier stance that I would vote you?

3 - point 1 + play in general.

Posted: **Fri Feb 24, 2017 2:47 am**

In post 3388, havingfitz wrote:
In post 3387, Ramcius wrote:
In post 3386, havingfitz wrote:
In post 3385, Ramcius wrote:setting my lynch before having James flip?
Saying you are someone I would vote for. I.e. suspect.
indeed, but 1) my stance towards James didn't changed since my replacing in, so 2) why you changed your stance towards me? 3) Considering i claimed PR why would you want vote me anyway?
1 - the issue is your stance on James hasn't changed.
2 - you mean my earlier stance that I would vote you?
3 - point 1 + play in general.

can you explain why i would claim jk you as a scum? even if i was scum rb, why claim jk instead town rb?

Posted: **Fri Feb 24, 2017 3:04 am**

In post 3389, Ramcius wrote:can you explain 1) why i would claim jk you as a scum? 2) even if i was scum rb, why claim jk instead town rb?

1) a. there is no definitive proof you actually are a jk. b. to possibly implicate me if there was no nk n2.
2) how does that even matter? Perhaps because they have similar powers but one is more associated with town.

Question about your claim...idr if it's been asked...why did you jk me instead of Vifam N1?

Posted: **Fri Feb 24, 2017 3:18 am**

In post 3390, havingfitz wrote:
In post 3389, Ramcius wrote:can you explain 1) why i would claim jk you as a scum? 2) even if i was scum rb, why claim jk instead town rb?
1) a. there is no definitive proof you actually are a jk. b. to possibly implicate me if there was no nk n2.
2) how does that even matter? Perhaps because they have similar powers but one is more associated with town.

Question about your claim...idr if it's been asked...why did you jk me instead of Vifam N1?

i was picking someone who i was seeing scummy, but not lynch worthy, it was you or TTTT, Wifam was very likely lynch of D2, so mafia wouldn't use him to kill

yes, there no proof, but what if you was a PR? it would backfired for no reason, why jk over rb, when there claimed rolecop in play that can check me?

Posted: **Fri Feb 24, 2017 3:26 am**

You know Ramcius, if you really did jailkeep me last night, it could mean I was targeted. As I wouldn't out who I checked.

But I don't know why you keep obsessing over no kill made when you jailed him N1

Posted: **Fri Feb 24, 2017 3:42 am**

In post 3392, CommKnight wrote:You know Ramcius, if you really did jailkeep me last night, it could mean I was targeted. As I wouldn't out who I checked.

But I don't know why you keep obsessing over no kill made when you jailed him N1

my jk on you takes effect N3, my night actions are delayed, at least i assume so, since there nothing in my pm about my night actions not being delayed, that means my block on Fitz took effect N2, so posible i blocked N1 delayed NK from mafia team, you are safe for tonight and rb on you have no effect, you couldn't use your ability anyway, if you say true about being non consec. With redirector in play i had no reason block you, especially night you can't use your ability. Bus driver i don't believe, why swap Fitz and Zekro? Anyway, at this point you as good as VT till redirector alive

Posted: **Fri Feb 24, 2017 3:54 am**

In post 3373, Almost50 wrote:So, what IS you point still? That I'm faking my Vig claim? I sure could be, but it should only confirm me as Town to you in particular if you're serious about using my meta as a guage.

Or that I'm telling you misleading details about my role which IS the Vig? Again, it's evident that I do this often, and you have played with me enough to know that.

Or are you proposing that I'm SCUM fake claiming a Vig? Cuz THAT would be inexplicable as hell. It first necessitates you to have a scum read on the one I'm trying to save. Do you SR Comm?

Then it requires you to assume I'm stupid enough to out myself to save my Scum p. Is this what you think of me, based on your extensive experience with me?

PV, I don't know if you're scum or town (I'm leaning Town, but even I would admit my town game needs tweaking), but you seriously need to take a closer look at the game as a whole and at me in particular. This is NOT my Scum game and you know it. As Scum I'm MUCH better than this.. as embarrassing as me saying this would be.

Except none of this is a good thing. If you are town fakeclaiming, then why? If you are doing it to protect your reads, that's dumb, because reads are just that, reads. And when you die, we look at what you posted as truthful information to solve the game. If you lied, then you effectively reduce our chances of winning.

If you are scum fakeclaiming, then we want to figure out who you are protecting.

None of this is based on extensive experience, it's based on previous games with you were you were town. Where they comprehensive or indicative of future games? Probably not, but the net result is you claim sounds fake.

Posted: **Fri Feb 24, 2017 3:56 am**

Well uhm either way the only way for RC to be scum is for Comm to be scum too and that's unlikely so

Posted: **Fri Feb 24, 2017 3:56 am**

Not RC I meant Almost my bad

Posted: **Fri Feb 24, 2017 3:56 am**

In post 3372, Almost50 wrote:So, in sum.. I DID read, but I just lied about it so a not to be forced to out my reads and thus have "outside effect" to my decision(), either by someone SRing, or someone defending one of my SRs, or Scum pushing me hard enough that I'd have to claim prematurely.

Thank you for attending class 101 of BASIC ALMOST50 PLAY

Lying about reading the thread in order to not make us think of you as a valuable replacement, but instead see you as another lazy replacement?

Not sure how that tricks scum, but it definitely makes it hard to think you know what you are saying about the game if you are claiming not to have read it.

Posted: **Fri Feb 24, 2017 3:58 am**

In post 3393, Ramcius wrote:
In post 3392, CommKnight wrote:You know Ramcius, if you really did jailkeep me last night, it could mean I was targeted. As I wouldn't out who I checked.

But I don't know why you keep obsessing over no kill made when you jailed him N1
my jk on you takes effect N3, my night actions are delayed, at least i assume so, since there nothing in my pm about my night actions not being delayed, that means my block on Fitz took effect N2, so posible i blocked N1 delayed NK from mafia team, you are safe for tonight and rb on you have no effect, you couldn't use your ability anyway, if you say true about being non consec. With redirector in play i had no reason block you, especially night you can't use your ability. Bus driver i don't believe, why swap Fitz and Zekro? Anyway, at this point you as good as VT till redirector alive

I used my action N1... had to wait till N2 ended for my result, which means I could've used it again tonight. But you're right, while someone is screwing with actions, my role won't exactly be helpful.

Posted: **Fri Feb 24, 2017 4:09 am**

In post 3398, CommKnight wrote:
In post 3393, Ramcius wrote:
In post 3392, CommKnight wrote:You know Ramcius, if you really did jailkeep me last night, it could mean I was targeted. As I wouldn't out who I checked.

But I don't know why you keep obsessing over no kill made when you jailed him N1
my jk on you takes effect N3, my night actions are delayed, at least i assume so, since there nothing in my pm about my night actions not being delayed, that means my block on Fitz took effect N2, so posible i blocked N1 delayed NK from mafia team, you are safe for tonight and rb on you have no effect, you couldn't use your ability anyway, if you say true about being non consec. With redirector in play i had no reason block you, especially night you can't use your ability. Bus driver i don't believe, why swap Fitz and Zekro? Anyway, at this point you as good as VT till redirector alive
I used my action N1... had to wait till N2 ended for my result, which means I could've used it again tonight. But you're right, while someone is screwing with actions, my role won't exactly be helpful.

exactly, i submitted jk on you N2, which will take effect N3 and will block your N2 submitted action, following your claim you couldn't submit action N2, so i couldn't affect your abilities N2 as you had wait that night anyway, then it's just defense from normal NK attempts (by normal i mean not strongman)

Mafiascum.net

Timeshift Mafia III [Game Over]