Posted: Wed May 05, 2021 10:35 pm
Let's just kill Kitty and find out?
Then we can actually believe in his check.
Then we can actually believe in his check.
Regardless to check... but not regardless t3 roleIn post 3377, Enchant wrote:We kinda planned to kill him regardless of check on day 2
Mafia didn't knew we could change mind because of flip.In post 3381, Vasex wrote:Regardless to check... but not regardless t3 roleIn post 3377, Enchant wrote:We kinda planned to kill him regardless of check on day 2
Btw dgb said that kitty will be elimed "tomorrow"
Early bus'ing.In post 3324, WindowsXP wrote:In post 128, WindowsXP wrote:why me fry meIn post 130, WindowsXP wrote:your tone is scummy
I have seen it happen. The more brazen players can credibly pull it off.In post 3327, Rathe wrote:like it doesnt make sense for u to link ur self that heavily to mafia if ur mafia
Scum miller aka godfather isn't a thing in normals.In post 3350, Vasex wrote:Windows believes kitty much.
Windows believes dgb is not miller and true townie.
Explain how these 4 were bus'ing.In post 3354, WindowsXP wrote:I think CabD is spewed town, anastasia/Nero/STD/NDmath/A50/Dunn feels like a grouping that has all scum potentially. the only other person i would add there would be Vasex if I absolutely had to based on the rushing nature of their play d1 except when T3 was wagoned. The thing is, Out of the names outside the wagon, I had given concrete reasons about my T3 stance, meaning that I had a genuine thought process about it.
If anyone was bussing on wagon: samantha, Etine, Kerset, Vasex are the pool of 4 ONLY that i would consider there. everyone else is fine.
They chose me because I'm useless.In post 3370, Vasex wrote:The best tactic for town's leash is to leash scum to a scum.
So if mafia leashes true cop kitty, why they decide to choose dgb?
Who could be easy in scums or lean scums after t3's death.
Smth interesting here, but we need to understand should we believe kitty at all?
They may fear a watcher in a large game especially .In post 3371, Enchant wrote:I think, mafia doesh't actually need to leash someone. If they find out Cop checking someone, who is mafia member, they simple shot them or prevent check.
explain how they weren't??In post 3389, DrippingGoofball wrote:Explain how these 4 were bus'ing.In post 3354, WindowsXP wrote:I think CabD is spewed town, anastasia/Nero/STD/NDmath/A50/Dunn feels like a grouping that has all scum potentially. the only other person i would add there would be Vasex if I absolutely had to based on the rushing nature of their play d1 except when T3 was wagoned. The thing is, Out of the names outside the wagon, I had given concrete reasons about my T3 stance, meaning that I had a genuine thought process about it.
If anyone was bussing on wagon: samantha, Etine, Kerset, Vasex are the pool of 4 ONLY that i would consider there. everyone else is fine.
moonlogic maximum.In post 3386, DrippingGoofball wrote:Early bus'ing.In post 3324, WindowsXP wrote:In post 128, WindowsXP wrote:why me fry meIn post 130, WindowsXP wrote:your tone is scummy
as an aside i am drafting a post but i wanted to quote this bc i like this post in retrospectIn post 366, Etine wrote:That's a bit of a doozy to answer. Do I believe that the team of (T3/Marky/Nero) all saw me doing my thing and ganged up on me? T3 even showed up and TR both Marky/Nero for their effort. I want to say that would make me very happy if true but possibly more complicated.
In post 3385, WindowsXP wrote:i think cop inno is stronger than cop guilty.
So ok, maybe it is trueIn post 3388, DrippingGoofball wrote:Scum miller aka godfather isn't a thing in normals.In post 3350, Vasex wrote:Windows believes kitty much.
Windows believes dgb is not miller and true townie.
In post 3115, DrippingGoofball wrote:In post 3067, WindowsXP wrote:Ah i have time here - didnt hammer so I can see who does hammer for info. Selfish i know but it helps my pov.In post 3064, WindowsXP wrote:If i want to go about something a specific way i refuse to get bullied into something else.In post 3061, WindowsXP wrote:I have a very specific reason for not hammering that is deeper than that. But keel trying to shade me and see where it gets you.In post 3059, WindowsXP wrote:I dont hammer resolvable investigative claims but heres me not pushing for unvotes bc i think the evidence now is pretty compelling.
(I.e. i dont want this wagon necessarily on principle and wont ve tbe final vote)In post 3007, WindowsXP wrote:I dont wanna vote t3 but ill let the wagon go with less resistance. I want to observe what happens now.