Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2022 10:37 am
i did not say you were >_>
I know I'm deep into the tunnel when I realize I can use this against Frog regardless of tene's alignment. lolIn post 3126, Frogsterking wrote:Unfortunately I don't think it's AI in fact I think the clashing and the recurring wagons indicate the slot is town.
????In post 3372, Datisi wrote:there were 3 quick votes on wu by me, vp, and monkey (i think? i'm not going back to check again) and nero didn't really say anything despite definitely being around and still being willing to hammer
baltar, monkey, and i voted back to back in 2388, 2389, 2390. you posted at 2398, 2399, 2401, 2410, 2414, etc. where you did not say anything negative about the fact that there were 3 quick votes in succession on generalwu, and you even mentioned that you would be willing to hammer in 2410. this does NOT mean "nero was around when generalwu got hammered". so it doesn't seem like you have huge problems with quick voting in general. so once i get to the present, i need to see why you were negatively talking about the 3 quick voted on frogster earlier, and compare if the mindsets match up or note.In post 3377, Nero Cain wrote:????In post 3372, Datisi wrote:there were 3 quick votes on wu by me, vp, and monkey (i think? i'm not going back to check again) and nero didn't really say anything despite definitely being around and still being willing to hammer
no
The problem seems to be you taking issue with rapid voting on a wagon that is nowhere near a yeet and not with an actual, you know, miselim.In post 3380, Nero Cain wrote:fua and cape hammered Wu last night when I wasn't here and today dats, VP and Yeet threw down 3 rapid fire votes on Frog and I said I didn't like it so he's complaining that I didn't say anything about the hammer last night?
I'm just explaining what datisi is saying to you because you seem to NOT GET ITIn post 3384, Nero Cain wrote:YOU were the one that pushed the mislim the hardest though
I wasn't planning to, no.In post 3365, VP Baltar wrote:You going to answer this tenebros?In post 3357, VP Baltar wrote:Discredit him how? By calling his points bad and explaining why? What, specifically, do you think I have not addressed that should be?In post 3355, tenebrousluminary wrote:Save 2807, those seem like mainly just trying to discredit him to me, but okay
No. Did you answer my question of who your scum reads are and why yet?In post 3389, Frogsterking wrote:VP did you read my post yet?
is there a reason you are refusing or are you just saying: "no, I will not answer this" ?In post 3388, tenebrousluminary wrote:I wasn't planning to, no.
The question is asking for a lot of effort and I would rather just drop the topic than give it.In post 3394, Scorpious wrote:is there a reason you are refusing or are you just saying: "no, I will not answer this" ?In post 3388, tenebrousluminary wrote:I wasn't planning to, no.
scum would care more.. avoiding a question is scum behavior 101,but not with a straight up refusal and fair reason..In post 3396, tenebrousluminary wrote:The question is asking for a lot of effort and I would rather just drop the topic than give it.In post 3394, Scorpious wrote:is there a reason you are refusing or are you just saying: "no, I will not answer this" ?In post 3388, tenebrousluminary wrote:I wasn't planning to, no.
It's not a lot of effort for me to ask you to give me specifics instead of generalizations that are shading me. It's only a lot of effort if you're making shit up and don't have actual reasons for what you're saying.In post 3396, tenebrousluminary wrote:The question is asking for a lot of effort and I would rather just drop the topic than give it.In post 3394, Scorpious wrote:is there a reason you are refusing or are you just saying: "no, I will not answer this" ?In post 3388, tenebrousluminary wrote:I wasn't planning to, no.
you mean like it totally hadn't changed with math and monkey and fua right? because there's no such thing that could shift the gamestate instantly riiight?In post 2679, Cape90 wrote:I really doubt the threadstate would have changed that much within those 2 days or whatever it was that we had left
do you have a read on ANY of the players involved in this discussion?In post 2686, Scorpious wrote:Well then the other one better be scum since its so easy .. Cause I ain'tIn post 2673, Cape90 wrote:This game is really just that easy
VOTE: VP Baltar
this is interesting since i recall when in a previous game cape and i were t/t and he made a similarly-sounding huge wallcase on why i'm scum and i think i did get voted there, and then i got unvoted 5 minutes later because lol but like point beingIn post 2699, VP Baltar wrote:I'll look at it in depth and with good faith when I have a moment (which is not now). That being said, I am extremely skeptical a person puts that much effort into a giant post and doesn't vote. It's a failure of being timid as scum.In post 2692, tenebrousluminary wrote:Did you plan on responding to its substance, or just shading Cape for writing it?