Mafiascum.net

↑ F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:

↑ Egg wrote:Eye, I know this is going to sound weird coming from someone whose been voting Antihero all game, but what do you like about Jesus' case? I thought it was pretty bad apart from where they say "vote Antihero".

I wondered the same thing. I'm not sure which I disliked more: Jesus's case or Eye sheeping it. But I want to see how the thing with Eye waiting on the mod plays out and what it is before I try and make a judgment on what I think.

↑ F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:

On Boonskies

, I skimmed a part of his ISO and I think he naturally has a fake sounding demeanor, for instance, in how he deals with RVS votes. The reasoning that he normally uses to suspect people is fairly elementary like "I didn't like how Player X started townreading the big wagons", etc but he's also fairly confident in defending that reasoning. He also makes an interesting statement about bussing saying that if he saw his partner run up, he would have bussed. I want Antihero's thoughts on this and I'll also double check later whether his interaction with partners matches how he interacted with Mikuru/AA9 here. Boonskies tends to fairly conf-biased in his reads as shown by his confidence in his scumreads as well as seeing everything that players do as fitting into his worldview. He also tends to quickly townread players that tend to meltdown, rage and freak out easily. An interesting divergence in his town thought process is his feigning confidence when not actually confident as shown by him switching votes around a lot and insisting that since it is only page 10, no one is certain in their reads except scum. Overall town-Boonskies sounds fake on the surface but spends a lot of time genuinely scumhunting, changing his stances and taking in the gamestate and his thoughts and reads are fairly transparent. I'm not yet sure where his play here falls in that range.

↑ F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:Ugh, I kinda feel you wouldn't pull the "look at my GTKAS" card as scum unless you are going for a whole new level of manipulation. There's something I need to in a bit so this will be quick but I'm going through your ISO backwards for your Antihero read and I'll comment on that before I go.

↑ jesusbuddhavrishnathebest wrote:because right now it seems like the only people who realize i did make an actual antihero read are you and ffery
which is kind of hilarious but also sort of concerning

↑ F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:Which posts do you want me to comment on? Your ISO is massive. Point me to them.

↑ jesusbuddhavrishnathebest wrote:but then there's people like egg who missed the entire case against antihero and antihero who i thought knew me better than he apparently does?
and somehow missed my actual case against him to respond to the easy thing to respond to and still manage to sound sort of town while doing it.

↑ jesusbuddhavrishnathebest wrote:but then there's people like egg who missed the entire case against antihero and antihero who i thought knew me better than he apparently does?
and somehow missed my actual case against him to respond to the easy thing to respond to and still manage to sound sort of town while doing it.

↑ jesusbuddhavrishnathebest wrote:it's more a commentary on how you can't tell the difference between skrew and i

↑ Antihero wrote:

↑ jesusbuddhavrishnathebest wrote:but then there's people like egg who missed the entire case against antihero and antihero who i thought knew me better than he apparently does?
and somehow missed my actual case against him to respond to the easy thing to respond to and still manage to sound sort of town while doing it.

ok, so where in the 653 spam posts is the "real case"

if nobody can find it, maybe the problem isn't with EVERYONE ELSE