Mafiascum.net

Huh?

In post 3400, Titus wrote:Huh?

I wasn't actually sure myself.


A50 pls help

and GIMME that pagetop motherfucker

*sigh*

In post 3403, shannon wrote:*sigh*

same

hey girl

wanna lynch implosion?

Okay reading back the posts of the day. Much of it seems like useless bickering. So if you are actually counting post 3329, I'm saying no to both. I've had a town read on Dunn and Titus since mid D1. Plus, I have no interest lynching Wake. I feel strongly that all three are town.

In post 3382, podoboq wrote:

In post 3380, Almost50 wrote:EVERYBODY is already voting multiple times within a few hours.

No, between two and four players are.

A large number of players are just lurking, including the person you're intending to target. I'll help you out here.

VOTE: PeregrineV

This is where the game is now. The day is full of the talkers talking and voting on the lurkers lurking. I'd love to hear more from Performer, PV, and Mirhawk. I understand the voting reasons on the lurkers, but I fear if we do lynch one of them that we won't have a whole lot of information for D3. Sure, the NK will get us some information, but that didn't give us much here today in D2. Didn't Performer ask for a replacement? I thought I saw that.

Can you pop up a feminist ryan gosling meme with that? It would help

In post 3382, podoboq wrote:

In post 3380, Almost50 wrote:EVERYBODY is already voting multiple times within a few hours.

No, between two and four players are.

A large number of players are just lurking, including the person you're intending to target. I'll help you out here.

VOTE: PeregrineV

That's much appreciated. Thank you

VOTE: PeregrineV

In post 3218, Dunnstral wrote:I've actually started to suspect Boem a bit more

Why Performer?

Performer, the Scum Actor: Sparknotes Edition:

-Takes early stances of non-committal including voting to no-lynch (47) and asking certain players to not interact with him (387). Of a newbie, fine. Of someone who has played over 15 games on-site, not ok. Pure avoidance. "Too scum to be scum" - bullshit.
- A metric fuckton of empty posts that amount to absolutely nothing. Lot's of shit like 393, 399, and 544 which actually contribute nothing. Add in 1024 and 1025, and we have a pattern of posting for the sake of posting, but trying to mask it as doing something even though he's not. A long time ago, we called this active lurking.
- The "Implosion knows what NAI stands For" Tour. Fun fact - I had no fucking clue what NAI stood for. It isn't a term that has been around forever. I just fucking ignored it because I'm better than TLAs amirite? But seriously, that was one of the most ill-conceived pushes I've seen in a while. He's essentially using joindates (he even says "This looks 100% fake. imp is experienced enough to know NAI stands for that.") to determine who should know what so he can paint them as scum, taking 0% of the fact that meta shifts rapidly on this site with the influxes of players from other sites in surges into account. He follows up on this shit in 1042 after it had been established that acronyms can't possibly be a fucking scumtell, can they?
- Posts like 1038 are just useless. Yeah, I was fucking abrasive Day 1. I probably deserved a warning at least (there were times where I submitted the post then 5 minutes later was like "Oh shit, will I get banned?"). But the fact that I didn't means speculating on what he would do as an admin/mod amounts to a whole bunch of fuckall.
- 1041 and 1043 give soft pushes on Nos, based on weak meta, but he literally never votes Nos at this point even though he's laying himself out a roadmap.
- Regularly brings up having "high expectations" of folks. Based off of what seems to be "I've seen you in games before." Guess what? I saw a lot of people in a lot of games way back, and they were still shit players. Time on site, games played - doesn't mean shit.
- 1066 - "Titus could be faking, but I'm not lynching her." We were soundly in two camps at that point - "Titus is fake-claiming this as scum. Lynch her." or "Titus wouldn't do this as scum, this is dumb, let's lynch someone else." I don't remember anyone being so dead in the middle of that one, offhand.
- 1077 - I say "Lynch the mason" - the one he suggests could be fake claiming, and he votes me in response.
- 1119 - Very rarely do I find OMGUS to be at all a scumtell, but this is a rare occasion. His vote on Transcend is fucking awful, and this is coming from someone who thinks Transcend is probably shitty town at the most small-chance best case scenario, and scum at worst. The post has a lot of useless spec, and then at the end is "Oh hey, Transcend voted me - quote and vote baby!"
- 1130 - No lynch? REALLY??!?!!? I can understand early on. But a no-lynch 1100+ posts into a game is just asinine. +
- Shit like 1330 and 1338 - "Explain your read to me!" "Oh. I had you scum but now town." One case shouldn't swing players to those kind of extremes outside of way early Day 1 and special exceptions, neither of which we've had. We have enough content by that point at the very least that a read on a player like Zach should've been fairly well established and any movement on the needle is minimal.
- Multiple later D1 posts, he buddies hard to Vedith. Like he's glad to have an ally coming in. It's late enough that buddying might fly under the radar, especially with the other shit that popped up in Day 1. But it's fucking there.
After this, it gets hazy of him posting anything of merit, but I think I made my point. He's a pretty bad player in a best case scenario, but I'm pretty sure he's just a scumbag.

In post 3325, implosion wrote:If I can get the motivation I also might formally case Mirhawk since at least one person was asking for it.

Ooh ooh pick me, please do! (Seriously, I want to see what ever the fuck I'm missing on him, so a case would be appreciated. I even asked for an ELI5).

Ok, I saw it. I can wrap my head around that. I'd still prefer a performer or Boem lynch, but I'm at least understanding the "why" of a Mirhawk lynch.

In post 3373, Wake1 wrote:

In post 3364, Dunnstral wrote:OK I read the whole thing and wake needs to shut up

podoboq is a bad lynch though

Anyone else notice that Mirhawk came in and voted me? lol

You can scream all you want, but you don't control anyone here.

It's also ironic considering you've posted far more often than me.

If you're going to tell me to shut up I'll simply dismiss as a lowlife.

Nor do you.

Wait, if we all tell you to shut up, will you dismiss us all as lowlives and enter into some alternate reality where you're the only one posting? I'd be ok with that.

Shut up, Wake.

You really want to model something after FIFA?!?!?! Literally the 4 letter acronym that really means corruption.

In post 3401, Zachstralkita wrote:

In post 3400, Titus wrote:Huh?

I wasn't actually sure myself.


A50 pls help

Help do what? I want to lynch inside the 3 lurkers. Besides they'll probably be a liability/heavy burden on our backs starting D3.

P-edit:

@AGar:

LOL.. good point, although they DO reach decisions regardless.

OK let's do this then

VOTE: Performer

Far be it from me not to jump on a wagon. VOTE: Performer

VOTE: Performer

Zach!Daddy, look what we're doing now.

In post 3370, Dunnstral wrote:Mirhawk is cornered scum here. Look at his last post.

I don't see anything in implosion to indicate he's scum. That's not saying I see him as towny I just don't know why he's voted

Performer was towny in my mind too

In post 3410, Dunnstral wrote:OK let's do this then

VOTE: Performer

I laughed so hard

NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post 3407 is a good post and I'm pretty sure Agar is town

My reads are fluid but FIRM when needed

This is a good place to vote

In post 3414, Transcend wrote:NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WHAT

lost implosion momentum

oh that's whatever

I thought you like, didn't want performer dead


or something

Performer said he's subbing out in his latest post, which would be really shitty if he's scum.

Not really...?

In post 3091, Performer wrote:Hey folks,

so I was doing a skim catchup before the servers crashed. Did a check of how d1 ended, I'm glad we got mafia scum. Not sure why there is Titus talking about reaction fishing while voting me - isn't the purpose of reaction fishing not supposed to be revealed that obviously?
Anyway , there have been irl commitments that are just getting in my way to properly continue contributing as a player in FM. I sincerely apologize but I'll have to replace out. I am town.

My honest apologies to the mod - I just don't believe I can stay invested as a player in FM games, the way my commitments are going on irl now. I have a number of wedding preparation events my friend has me helping out on, my career I'm doing overtime at, etc etc.

If he's mafia then he is a complete, total, absolute scumbag.

I got a little carried away here, but this stuff irritates me. I'd prefer playing a game without enabling replacements, this way I have to figure out who is an asshole and who really has some stuff going on in his/her life.

look at performer's posts. he subbed out in all his games. it's NAI.

That guy really likes subbing out. Doesn't make him scum though.