There is nothing inherently suspicious about putting a wagon solidly ahead of another without the knowledge that the second is a wolf wagon
-Wind
Deadline looming, knowledge that 4T is not your partner, and it being a pretty "unsuspicious" spot are all pretty decent indicators, my dude. Ez to "appear helpful" with out "being suspicious"
Okay great that’s what I’d do as wolf
What makes you think that’s what happened here
-Wind
Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2019 2:19 pm
by PJ.
The fact that you just explained that it isn't suspicious because "it''s not a suspicious time to vote". Of course you don't think it is. That's a circular question.
Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2019 2:21 pm
by mastina
In post 3025, Shiro wrote:Mastina can I interest you in helping me on lynching cafe ? They are pretty scum and Titus is probably not.
If this still holds?
Sure why not.
Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2019 2:38 pm
by Chaos Wind
In post 3404, PJ. wrote:The fact that you just explained that it isn't suspicious because "it''s not a suspicious time to vote". Of course you don't think it is. That's a circular question.
You're the one being circular here
You called it suspicious and are now justifying it with that I asked how it was suspicious
-Wind
Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2019 2:41 pm
by mastina
In post 3187, Furret und Woopers wrote:@mastina What does your PT look like? Like, whats the dynamic between you and Elsa in there?
Bit too tired to go into it right now. Fair number of posts by me, some content, some not, some solving not in the game thread for whatever reason--don't want to put it publicly yet or don't want to read things while logged in but did so while logged out and made notes that way, sort of stuff.
In post 3193, Elsa Jay wrote:She probably doesn't trust me to say anything. She's also right as I've been sworn to secrecy to only reveal the damning readslist on her deathbed. That was scum can't kill both of us.
Does Mastina have reads on which scum are goons?
One goon will exist the rest will be PRs. But, scum's scum. Doesn't matter which are the PRs and which is the goon, we need them dead just as soon.
In post 3025, Shiro wrote:Mastina can I interest you in helping me on lynching cafe ? They are pretty scum and Titus is probably not.
If this still holds?
Sure why not.
Lord Mastina has spoken.
VOTE: Cafe
Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2019 2:45 pm
by Chaos Wind
ive still been busy past couple of days
im here for a short period of time
-chaos
Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2019 2:48 pm
by Chaos Wind
panzer, you do realize your post means absolute jackshit unless alchemist is scum?
TTTT already had 5 votes, and was likely the Lynch
the only viable CW was alch, who had 3.
if alchemist is town as well, what reasoning does scum have to vote TTTT?
your response literally ignores the point that chemist brought up.
and your post is circular too.
if TTTT is scum, "oh its a bus vote because the wagon was solidified"
if TTTT is town/3p, "oh its a hop on a mislynch wagon"
it ignores the fact that chemist thought TTTT was more likely scum than alchemist and wanted the Lynch to be on TTTT, thinking he was scum
instead of alchemist, thinking he's more likely town.
I'd say you are better than this, but frankly I kinda doubt it
Anyway I'm out too because it's time to sleep for me
-Wind
Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2019 3:19 pm
by Flavor Leaf
Aight. A stressful scum game of mine had been taking up the majority of my time on site while simultaneously was playing a stressful large normal game. I hit 700+ posts on both of them.
In post 3404, PJ. wrote:The fact that you just explained that it isn't suspicious because "it''s not a suspicious time to vote". Of course you don't think it is. That's a circular question.
You're the one being circular here
You called it suspicious and are now justifying it with that I asked how it was suspicious
-Wind
"Vote is suspicious"
"Why is it suspicious? I don't think it is"
"This is why it's suspicious"
"Why would.I do it if it's suspucious?"
"Because you literally just said you thought you weren't being suspicious, this is going to be circular"
"You're the one being circular here"
In post 3404, PJ. wrote:The fact that you just explained that it isn't suspicious because "it''s not a suspicious time to vote". Of course you don't think it is. That's a circular question.
You're the one being circular here
You called it suspicious and are now justifying it with that I asked how it was suspicious
-Wind
"Vote is suspicious"
"Why is it suspicious? I don't think it is"
"This is why it's suspicious"
"Why would.I do it if it's suspucious?"
"Because you literally just said you thought you weren't being suspicious, this is going to be circular"
"You're the one being circular here"
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
