Mafiascum.net

In post 3399, Datisi wrote:because nothing has happened to change my mind and you refuse to die

well if I died and flipped green what would you do tommorrow in lylo?

(1) cry
(2) sheep skitter

In post 3351, Datisi wrote:i'll try to make s bigger post later on to explain it as best as i can. but like. ughhh.

sorry :/ i'm working on it
if it helps i've skimmed the last page or so and i think pooky's arguing with you in p bad faith

i'm not sure that me visiting town!dsjstr leads to him getting nk'd, and if he's scum i anticipate him lying about getting it

In post 3361, the worst wrote:Do my townreads really need to be secret if I'm camping skitter tho

not really

In post 3363, Datisi wrote:skitt i am begging you to consider what i'm saying here

i think u made a p convincing argument

In post 3371, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:if you dont confirm skitter u autohang today lol

not sure he does
i think it would have been more likely for me to hang in that scenario tbh

you hanging would make 0 sense imo

skitt, how likely do you think it is that i am wrongly tunnelled here?

In post 3363, Datisi wrote:how likely do you think is that there's scum in {dats, duck, s_s}? i wanna talk setup specc (i promise those two sentences are related)

also when you can, i still wanna talk about this ^^

In post 3379, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I trust skitters skill and her role so I feel like unless I get a firm read on something my best odds r just to sheep her at this point.

???

In post 3407, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:you hanging would make 0 sense imo

if i didn't get someone to confirm me there's a p decent chance i get hung today given how yesterday went

In post 3408, Datisi wrote:skitt, how likely do you think it is that i am wrongly tunnelled here?

In post 3363, Datisi wrote:how likely do you think is that there's scum in {dats, duck, s_s}? i wanna talk setup specc (i promise those two sentences are related)

also when you can, i still wanna talk about this ^^

idk if you're wrongly tunneled
i think you've made some p good arguments wrt pooky and i'm not sure he's really refuted them

i think you're town
duck i'm begrudgingly saying is town cuz of mechanics (but i would still be townreading him on play)

in a vaccuum i guess i'd say ss is town but i feel the least confident of the 3 and is it weird that i think he's a viable pooky partner?

what do u wanna talk about setup spec?

In post 3397, skitter30 wrote:

In post 3305, dsjstr wrote:If I'm wrong then I'd like to be the hammer today.

can you explain why you want to be hammer today?

I have many many many town games where I am the elim in ELO, I'd like to avoid that.

In post 3411, skitter30 wrote:what do u wanna talk about setup spec?

ok this isn't a cold hard unrefutable proof, but it is an idea i had and i wanna hear your thoughts

if forced to claim, and if scum is claiming basic VT, do you think it is likely that they're going to "low effort" just claim a random VT from the game that their actual player/role is from rather than going into their safe flavour fakeclaims? when they're claiming VT anyway?

i don't follow how being the hammerer today will help with that tomorrow

he's saying he wants to be the day's elimination, skitt

ohhhhhhhhh this whole time i read that as 'wanting to be the person who hammers' vs 'wanting to be the person hammered'

that makes a lot more sense
huh

In post 3413, Datisi wrote:if forced to claim, and if scum is claiming basic VT, do you think it is likely that they're going to "low effort" just claim a random VT from the game that their actual player/role is from rather than going into their safe flavour fakeclaims? when they're claiming VT anyway?

if it were me, probably just claim a random vt from my actual game

In post 3417, skitter30 wrote:

In post 3413, Datisi wrote:if forced to claim, and if scum is claiming basic VT, do you think it is likely that they're going to "low effort" just claim a random VT from the game that their actual player/role is from rather than going into their safe flavour fakeclaims? when they're claiming VT anyway?

if it were me, probably just claim a random vt from my actual game

ok
if we assume scum claims random VT from their owngame
and assume all scum is in {dsjstr, raven, pooky}
then dsjstr/raven cannot be the scumteam

if they were the scumteam, they would both be goons from their respective games (both of those games had 2 goon scumteam)

which doesn't fit with all of fn/bg/bomb

which again leads us to scum being...

this fails through the floor if you think s_s can be scum since that gaže had a scum PR but it's not a specifically strong argument to begin with anyway

i just wanted to present it since i did spend some time thinking about it

indeed
i appreciate you sharing it
not sure if it's super convincing cuz it relies on a series of assumptions that i'm not sure hold

is it bad that i think that micc just wouldn't include a bomb in this game so pooky is just lying?

i also think that but like :')
is anyone surprised i think that by this point :')

In post 3420, skitter30 wrote:indeed
i appreciate you sharing it
not sure if it's super convincing cuz it relies on a series of assumptions that i'm not sure hold

is it bad that i think that micc just wouldn't include a bomb in this game so pooky is just lying?

if you think a bomb wouldnt be included - why would i fakeclaim bomb?

Cuz you're actually from that game and claiming vig didnt go iver as well

I think micc would want to keep this normal-adjacent, if he can

i wouldnt fake claim vig as scum period lol