Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2021 1:22 pm
I really only want to flip in vp and dwlee
~ skitter
~ skitter
In post 3367, Dwlee99 wrote:As a partial reset: is anyone willing to vote SA here? I think if F&G is town, then enchant could be town, and then I think SA's push on them for the scum claim is extremely shallow
In post 3373, Dwlee99 wrote:I'd bet the game on at least one scum in FG/Enchant/SA atp
In post 3376, Dwlee99 wrote:Okay who do you think can't be paired with SA other than Bingle
Idk, I could be overthinking it, but the way Dwlee brought up "wanna vote SA" felt pretty odd to me, like I was TRing SA a bunch, the timing of Dwlee bringing it up felt like some kinda distraction? idk how to explain, the whole "I don't think far enough ahead for a possible partner"In post 3378, Dwlee99 wrote:Okay SA probably only scum with FG ?
I mean fair enuf but do u townread either of them?In post 3405, Toogeloo wrote:Because we're all assholes who want our own way. Why should I be the one that concedes?
I really think this is the teamIn post 3410, VP Baltar wrote:On enchant and bingle
Why would I waste time doing partner analysis when other people already had thoughts on itIn post 3402, Andante wrote:In post 3367, Dwlee99 wrote:As a partial reset: is anyone willing to vote SA here? I think if F&G is town, then enchant could be town, and then I think SA's push on them for the scum claim is extremely shallowIn post 3373, Dwlee99 wrote:I'd bet the game on at least one scum in FG/Enchant/SA atpIn post 3376, Dwlee99 wrote:Okay who do you think can't be paired with SA other than BingleIdk, I could be overthinking it, but the way Dwlee brought up "wanna vote SA" felt pretty odd to me, like I was TRing SA a bunch, the timing of Dwlee bringing it up felt like some kinda distraction? idk how to explain, the whole "I don't think far enough ahead for a possible partner"In post 3378, Dwlee99 wrote:Okay SA probably only scum with FG ?
the 3 names with "at least one scum" ehhh I tr all 3 of those names at the moment
there's something just off to me, "is anyone willing to vote SA here?" sounds like Dwlee is trying to take initiative in controlling town, directing our votes to a town, and like, we have 0 benefit to limming SA here, it doesn't make a whole lot of sense, unless you've thought ahead to partner stuff
Also how I'd probably lean. I'm not interested in dwlee, and I have felt VP more likely town today.In post 3411, Sleepless Assassin wrote:I really think this is the teamIn post 3410, VP Baltar wrote:On enchant and bingle
Isn't enchant an option?In post 3413, Toogeloo wrote:Also how I'd probably lean. I'm not interested in dwlee, and I have felt VP more likely town today.In post 3411, Sleepless Assassin wrote:I really think this is the teamIn post 3410, VP Baltar wrote:On enchant and bingle
But, hey, it's Burger King up in this thread.
if dwlee is town i will reconsiderIn post 3410, VP Baltar wrote:On enchant and bingle
that's what I want, but it takes 5 votes to elim someone, and this is a town divided.In post 3414, Dwlee99 wrote:Isn't enchant an option?In post 3413, Toogeloo wrote:Also how I'd probably lean. I'm not interested in dwlee, and I have felt VP more likely town today.In post 3411, Sleepless Assassin wrote:I really think this is the teamIn post 3410, VP Baltar wrote:On enchant and bingle
But, hey, it's Burger King up in this thread.
I haven't done a full deep dive on them as a team, but it's stuck in my head as making a lot of sense. They each have independently scummy behaviors and do not have negative associatives with each other that I can think of.In post 3415, Fun and Games wrote:if dwlee is town i will reconsiderIn post 3410, VP Baltar wrote:On enchant and bingle
i cannot promise that i will end up here tho
do u teamread them or just suspect both?
~ skitter