Mafiascum.net

In post 3425, SirCakez wrote:Math I have not been engaging your posts because whenever I try to you just go "lalalala" and put your fingers in your ears
so my check was not at all related to your wagon theories

In post 3423, SirCakez wrote:

In post 3404, SirCakez wrote:I just keep seeing posts from you where it looks like you have that "scum demotivation" you acknowledge you have had as a result of rolling scum so much lately.
And I'm concerned by how concerned you are about being scumread.

@Titus what do you think?

In post 3424, SirCakez wrote:that is in regards to Spiffeh

In post 3427, Titus wrote:

In post 3423, SirCakez wrote:

In post 3404, SirCakez wrote:I just keep seeing posts from you where it looks like you have that "scum demotivation" you acknowledge you have had as a result of rolling scum so much lately.
And I'm concerned by how concerned you are about being scumread.

@Titus what do you think?

I said there are reasons to vote me. My demotivation has been one of them. My demotivation does not come from rolling scum a lot or my past scum games. If I was scum, I could fake energy and would ride Math's coattails to an elimination on you.

It's also a fair, but weak, reason to vote me simply because I have been wagoned so much.

There are legitimate reasons to policy vote me but matching my scum meta is not one.

In post 3429, Titus wrote:

In post 3427, Titus wrote:

In post 3423, SirCakez wrote:

In post 3404, SirCakez wrote:I just keep seeing posts from you where it looks like you have that "scum demotivation" you acknowledge you have had as a result of rolling scum so much lately.
And I'm concerned by how concerned you are about being scumread.

@Titus what do you think?

I said there are reasons to vote me. My demotivation has been one of them. My demotivation does not come from rolling scum a lot or my past scum games. If I was scum, I could fake energy and would ride Math's coattails to an elimination on you.

It's also a fair, but weak, reason to vote me simply because I have been wagoned so much.

There are legitimate reasons to policy vote me but matching my scum meta is not one.

I forgot to state my demotivation exists because of the mechanics, Math, and I feel like this will be a TENET repeat.

In post 3430, MathBlade wrote:

In post 3429, Titus wrote:

In post 3427, Titus wrote:

In post 3423, SirCakez wrote:

In post 3404, SirCakez wrote:I just keep seeing posts from you where it looks like you have that "scum demotivation" you acknowledge you have had as a result of rolling scum so much lately.
And I'm concerned by how concerned you are about being scumread.

@Titus what do you think?

I said there are reasons to vote me. My demotivation has been one of them. My demotivation does not come from rolling scum a lot or my past scum games. If I was scum, I could fake energy and would ride Math's coattails to an elimination on you.

It's also a fair, but weak, reason to vote me simply because I have been wagoned so much.

There are legitimate reasons to policy vote me but matching my scum meta is not one.

I forgot to state my demotivation exists because of the mechanics, Math, and I feel like this will be a TENET repeat.

I have already stated previously why I think that’s a load of crap.

I thought we weren’t talking for 24 hours because I have a PoE.

In post 3428, Titus wrote:

In post 3424, SirCakez wrote:that is in regards to Spiffeh

What is in regards to Spiffeh?

In post 3423, SirCakez wrote:

In post 3404, SirCakez wrote:I just keep seeing posts from you where it looks like you have that "scum demotivation" you acknowledge you have had as a result of rolling scum so much lately.
And I'm concerned by how concerned you are about being scumread.

@Titus what do you think?

In post 518, MathBlade wrote:

In post 517, SirCakez wrote:

In post 493, MathBlade wrote:Furthermore I am sketched out that Bork never confirmed anything specific so we don’t know if Bork actually got it.

So this is just weird. I don’t like it and maintain my objection and if I am miselimmed while I am at work artifacts always go to townreads. Assume LLD is scum until/unless she proves a mason buddy as she is breaking the cardinal rules of how she operates. Her play today is absolute garbage and she should be ashamed.

I can't even remember a Bork post this game. He needs to get his butt in here.

Vig Cakez imho.

His stance around me and my posts reads as buddying yet paints me as having a meltdown.

People being nice to me doesn’t happen from town.

In post 538, SirCakez wrote:

In post 530, MathBlade wrote:General negativity and not building a townread list or starting from there

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... B%5D=26092

Same vibes as here
I suck at explaining meta reads so example provided

Ok but that's just how I play it's not unique to my scum meta.

In post 540, MathBlade wrote:Along that thought stream, what if LLD is town and Prism is town and they’re both town derp? Scum didn’t want me miselimmed but were more than happy to add to the pressure.

And Cakez that is not you every game. You ask more questions as town. More vocal.

In post 3434, SirCakez wrote:I get a list of all artifacts someone has
Spiffeh did not have any

In post 3434, SirCakez wrote:I get a list of all artifacts someone has
Spiffeh did not have any

In post 2000, SirCakez wrote:claiming because deadline
I'm Steve Jinks, Artifact Detector
Each day I can target someone and will get a list of their artifacts at EoD
I haven't used it yet because I haven't seen something to use it for yet
I was hoping to hide this and catch somebody in a lie later

In post 3334, Spiffeh wrote:@Bell Yes I thought we were trying to be subtle

I saw your instructions too

In post 3439, Tammy wrote:

In post 2000, SirCakez wrote:claiming because deadline
I'm Steve Jinks, Artifact Detector
Each day I can target someone and will get a list of their artifacts at EoD
I haven't used it yet because I haven't seen something to use it for yet
I was hoping to hide this and catch somebody in a lie later

In post 3443, Spiffeh wrote:I received it at the start of Afternoon today.

In post 3445, Spiffeh wrote:That is when I received the PM from the mod, I can confirm with her if that was intended.

In post 3444, MathBlade wrote:

In post 3443, Spiffeh wrote:I received it at the start of Afternoon today.

Upon receipt, a player may choose to interact with one Artifact in their possession per game phase. They may either use it or transfer the selected Artifact to another player rather than using it. This counts as the player's Artifact interaction for the night.

Transfers may only be performed during the Night phase.

If transferred, the recipient will be informed of the Artifact's Power and Negative Effect. They may also use any non-Artifact actions they have from their role, including the factional kill if Mafia. There is a limit of one non-factional kill role action used per player per phase.

Uhm how Spiffeh?

In post 3291, penguin_alien wrote:

With minimal coaxing, Trailer is convinced to sniff an outstretched hand and hardly notices when his scarf is removed. He is then promptly distracted by a thirteen-lined ground squirrel and gives chase. Would that the non-metallized people could find their attention drawn away from their grisly task so easily...