Page 139 of 191
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:46 pm
by Gentleman 5
In post 3429, Lady 5 wrote: In post 3424, Gentleman 5 wrote:Gentleman 6 wrote:G5 your posting this game has just been bad take after bad take after bad take and it makes me want to lynch you regardless of my read on you and I'm trying to rein that in but it's hard.
What’s my main?
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:48 pm
by Gentleman 5
Can we get an F in chat for G1 who looks to be rereading the entire game.
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:49 pm
by Lady 2
Can we get an F in chat for L2 who is being ghosted by her dance partner in their PT as we speak?
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:52 pm
by Gentleman 1
I am not rereading the game. I am reading thing I was not present for for the first time.
I posted in the PT as well, just a heads up.
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:54 pm
by Gentleman 1
I will try to pinpoint where it was again, but I feel like for a little bit your attitude was a bit overly antagonistic.
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:03 pm
by Gentleman 6
Really don't think the stuff that Star Wolf is presently posting is townposting.
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:04 pm
by Gentleman 5
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:16 pm
by Gentleman 5
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:23 pm
by Gentleman 1
In post 1189, Lady 6 wrote: In post 1188, Gentleman 4 wrote: In post 1183, Lady 6 wrote: In post 1177, Gentleman 4 wrote:Everything you've done today seems to come out of emotional response to the fact that you've been called out multiple times by multiple people. You don't seem to be aware of yourself, in control of your posting, your thoughts aren't congruent, there is little or no discernable process, direction, or purpose behind your posts other than to lash out at the people who have called you out. Hence, reactionary.
Look dudes, this chick scumreads me. Rather than ask why or look at the posts she found offensive, I'll just call her crazy and emotional.
If you have trouble understanding why I form the reads I have, how can you be confident their reactionary or emotional? Your posting towards me today has been gaslighting and discrediting rather than intending to solve my alignment.
I think it's beyond evident that I have done more than my part in research. I also don't find myself to be lacking in understanding as far what your reads are.
I haven't gaslighted you and I doubt that simply using big words to attempt to discredit me will get you very far. You've made multiple posts that show a remarkable lack of awareness of game state and positions, and several of your posts have said that things have happened that have specifically not happened. I highly recommend you re-examine your perspective.
I recommend you go die. Neither of us is getting what we want.
The closest I came today to an error in perspective is when I misread a question from L7 as involving you and not G3.
Until you put your reads in the thread, we have nothing more to say to each other, you repugnant toad.
I’ll state G4’s argument here is pretty lame, but this was uncalled for.
In post 1242, Lady 7 wrote:
Oh I ask because G1 was a bit of a conundrum for me. I liked some of his posts, but his quotestripe posts didn't felt kinda commenting to comment on things, which isn't in itself scummy because most everyone does it sometimes, but since it was mostly that one posting spree that I remember, I didn't get enough to get a feel for whether it was actually alignment indicative.
I appreciate the awareness displayed here. I have noticed “posting just to post” being commonly used, it feels like it might be a new buzzword. So deciding to write a cheap idea like that off seems towny.
In post 1244, Gentleman 5 wrote:G1, G7, and G8 are not active gentlemen. L1 isnt really here either.
G2 - L9
G3 ???
G4 - L3
G5 - L4/L5
G6 - L8/L7?
Assuming I get my salad on and G6 would change to L7, I would personally want to see G3 take L2
That leaves the inactive Gs with L1, L5, and L6 and L8
(If G6 takes L8, then G3 should take L7 and then it would be L1,2,5,6.)
Can we agree or work on this format for now?
This is the best attempt I have seen to create any sort of game plan up to here. I like it quite a lot.
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:29 pm
by Lady 5
Can I have an active person to replace Gent 8? K Thx.
And could they be someone who isn’t old and named Micheal. K Thx.
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:31 pm
by Lady 5
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:34 pm
by Lady 5
G2 got replaced?
Aw that sucks.
Why did you change your PFP G5?
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:34 pm
by Lady 5
It was Anime before.
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:35 pm
by Lady 5
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:35 pm
by Lady 5
In post 3452, Lady 2 wrote:Can we get an F in chat for L2 who is being ghosted by her dance partner in their PT as we speak?
F
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:39 pm
by Gentleman 1
In post 1257, Gentleman 3 wrote:I would rather leave out L2 than L5, I think L5 would be easier to read in the future.
I’d like it if you talked about this at some point.
In post 1270, Lady 8 wrote:I'm reading. I'm trying to commit to at least one catchup a day.
In post 1005, Gentleman 6 wrote:Whatever disregard correct play dance with the hottest girl.
Lady 8, will you dance with me?
I accept.
I am curious, as well as mildly concerned, about the fact L8 has to catch up yet is perfectly fine pairing and is conscious of the ability to pair at this point.
In post 1273, Lady 8 wrote: In post 1022, Lady 7 wrote:Can we please stop with the altguesses? It would really suck if he started force replacing due to it.
Not sure why G5 is being extremely aggro.
Also, I'm not really a big fan of L5 postings.
In post 1050, Lady 5 wrote: In post 1046, Gentleman 5 wrote:Honestly, theres alot I could say about L5 not accepting the proposal.
I thought she would have accepted that asap since people scumread her and probably have her pinned as a first target.
Im not sure how that makes me feel ie her alignment
Do people still scum read me for emojis? XD or something else?
Is this LAMIST? Also, I'm at like page 45 and wondering why G5 is ignoring all these questions.
I do like this examination into L5, though. Who, as I write this, is filling the game with meaningless drivel.
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:41 pm
by Gentleman 1
While it is on my mind, I would like to note something else questionable.
The moderator directly called out the fact it was G2 who was replaced here. So it baffles me that L5 is surprised by this fact. Again, I doubt L5 is this bad at remembering things, so I think it is an act.
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:52 pm
by Gentleman 6
You doubt that Lady 5 of all people in this game has trouble remembering something?
I feel like I wouldn't be surprised if she forgot her phone number.
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:53 pm
by Lady 5
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:54 pm
by Gentleman 1
What chemistry did you see in those two?
I am only responding to this because I am feeling rather worn out, I feel like I have made a modicum of progress, hopefully the thread doesn’t just swell in size again to kill my good feeling. In addition it seems like L2 is not on currently, and the biggest thing I wanted to do was talk with her in the PT a little. We did manage to talk to make that clear, but since she seems to have left me being around currently isn’t as important.
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:55 pm
by Lady 5
In post 3466, Gentleman 1 wrote:While it is on my mind, I would like to note something else questionable.
The moderator directly called out the fact it was G2 who was replaced here. So it baffles me that L5 is surprised by this fact. Again, I doubt L5 is this bad at remembering things, so I think it is an act.
I wasn’t paying attention to that part as why G4 wants me gone.
Why would I act about? Not remembering who replaced out? What would be the purpose of pretending to not remember?
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:56 pm
by Gentleman 1
In post 3467, Gentleman 6 wrote:You doubt that Lady 5 of all people in this game has trouble remembering something?
I feel like I wouldn't be surprised if she forgot her phone number.
To me it seems like she has selective recall. She seems to pick and choose what to remember, and it seems like is consistently choosing to forget rather important things.
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:57 pm
by Lady 5
In post 3469, Gentleman 1 wrote:
What chemistry did you see in those two?
I am only responding to this because I am feeling rather worn out, I feel like I have made a modicum of progress, hopefully the thread doesn’t just swell in size again to kill my good feeling. In addition it seems like L2 is not on currently, and the biggest thing I wanted to do was talk with her in the PT a little. We did manage to talk to make that clear, but since she seems to have left me being around currently isn’t as important.
She was complaining about you before so what’s exactly going on between you two?
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:57 pm
by Gentleman 1
The purpose of this selective recall, in my opinion, is to generate a plausible deniability to ignore anything at will in the future.
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:58 pm
by Gentleman 1
In post 3472, Lady 5 wrote: In post 3469, Gentleman 1 wrote:
What chemistry did you see in those two?
I am only responding to this because I am feeling rather worn out, I feel like I have made a modicum of progress, hopefully the thread doesn’t just swell in size again to kill my good feeling. In addition it seems like L2 is not on currently, and the biggest thing I wanted to do was talk with her in the PT a little. We did manage to talk to make that clear, but since she seems to have left me being around currently isn’t as important.
She was complaining about you before so what’s exactly going on between you two?
She had asked me some questions and I was being slow on answering them. I feel like that issue should be cleared up now, and we can start a proper back and forth soon.
