Mafiascum.net

ffery thank you for paraphrasing Nacho/Tammy's Purple Room thoughts btw that's probably really annoying

I would definitely thrive in this setup as scum.

In post 4601, Firebringer wrote:@Other Thread Send Brian Skies over. So we can hang out.

Lol. Hang out he says.

In reality, Firebringer is just a giant masochist and wants me to smack him with my unvote.

I'm never going to agree to you turnstiling me.

So you're better off just voting me.

he doesn't seem to believe in that titus read anymore lol

In post 4604, Firebringer wrote:

In post 3452, Brian Skies wrote:

In post 4601, Firebringer wrote:@Other Thread Send Brian Skies over. So we can hang out.

Lol. Hang out he says.

In reality, Firebringer is just a giant masochist and wants me to smack him with my unvote.

I actually wanted to smack u with the unvote.
Why would u smack me with it when u townread and always townread me?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

HUH!?!?!?

Because you only unvote players you think are town, right?

i guess you believe he believed it more than he believed it

youre basically kamina

In post 4608, Firebringer wrote:Silly Brian,
No. Do not pass go, do not collect 200. You are wrong. Go back to mafia school.

Why are you trying so hard to convince me you're scum? It really just makes the opposite effect.

In post 4612, Firebringer wrote:Okay Brian I bet i know how to convince u.

Big announcement:
I am retracting my cop claim.

I forgot you claimed cop, tbh.

You're still not invited to the Forwards thread.

In post 3391, Brian Skies wrote:I'm also curious about HP's strange fascination of keeping me alive as if I care about that.

There he is! There's town Brian!

In post 3398, Brian Skies wrote:HP may or may not be hardbuddying me.

and since I didn't do it earlier



-E

If we turnstile Almost50 today I want the other thread to turnstile skitter or pooky over here to lim them

In post 3401, Brian Skies wrote:Most of A50's iso is crumbing, lmao.

the correct term is breadloafing

-E

VOTE: Turnstile: Almost50

I don't want the other thread to elim him though.

In post 3461, Spiffeh wrote:If we turnstile Almost50 today I want the other thread to turnstile skitter or pooky over here to lim them

Why not elim within our own thread?

In post 3447, Titus wrote:I feel Brian is tonally town but may be scum mechanically

I have no idea how you would believe this. I don't know if you saying crazy noise like this is a bad sign or a good sign tho lmao

-E

Honestly turnstiling A50 could just confirm our whole thread as town so in that case it's necessary that they turnstile us a lim target

And if A50's turnstile doesn't confirm our thread as all town then idk who is scum over here

In post 4634, Deacon Blues wrote:

Fuck there's more from Tammy on the Forwards Neighborhood. I think this is the last one.

Tammy mentioned that Pooky floated an idea that even if the thread being cleared of scum wasn't announced, that a no-kill would mean everyone in the forwards thread is town. It pinged and she worried that scum could be setting up to no kill and then coast to endgame like the whole thread was ICs.

I don't think it was Pooky that said this.

In post 357, Gypyx wrote:Also, we don't necessarly *need* to get out all of the scum of a thread by n2, like, if we do it by n3 there will be a nokill which is a pretty clear sign?

Oh gee, look who actually said it.

In post 3449, Titus wrote:Nacho wanted to dive into the reasons that HP didn't explain their FL townread more and why they didn't try harder to save him.

I was pretty sure that the more I tried to defend Boon, the more likely that thread was to flip him. tbh I kinda thought pooky was pushing him at l east part because of my "masonize", although I didn't actually read pooky's interactions with Boon close enough to tell how much this was the case, more just a kinda vibe I had at the time based on how pooky was playing

tbh explaining why boon's alignment is boon's alignment I have often struggled with in the past. I'm... frequently correct, but not always so. Still, pretty proud of myself for how fast I nailed that read this game.

-E

ultimately a shit idea as scum because it doesn't confirm anything and wastes a kill

In post 3468, Brian Skies wrote:

In post 357, Gypyx wrote:Also, we don't necessarly *need* to get out all of the scum of a thread by n2, like, if we do it by n3 there will be a nokill which is a pretty clear sign?

Oh gee, look who actually said it.

But I mean... it's true? It's not hard confirmation, but it is a pretty good sign. If nothing else even if scum are no killing for wifom reasons that is still good for town overall.

like idk this reads more to me like a guy making sense of the setup than scum trying to set up a no kill gambit/no kill wifom

-E

In post 3471, Hench Princesses wrote:But I mean... it's true? It's not hard confirmation, but it is a pretty good sign. If nothing else even if scum are no killing for wifom reasons that is still good for town overall.

like idk this reads more to me like a guy making sense of the setup than scum trying to set up a no kill gambit/no kill wifom

As opposed to the plethora of other reasons that could explain the lack of a kill on N3?

Or any given night for that matter?

In post 3472, Brian Skies wrote:As opposed to the plethora of other reasons that could explain the lack of a kill on N3?

given imperium's flip I'm not sure I'd say there's a "plethora" of reasons for a no kill in this thread but that's more a discussion I'd rather have if we actually get into it

-E