I cannot assume the credibility of anyone's reads, and I ask that others would do the same with mines.
For someone claiming to not assume the credibility of anyone's reads...you sure have asked for a lot of players to trust in the credibility of townreads on you.
Are you sure you got that statement right? Reference some proof; it is your responsibility to show proof in your attacks against me.
I ask you refer to me such posts that indicates such behaviour.
Let's see. The massive wall war with AP. The fact that I fullclaimed, giving up on fighting to get myself nightkilled. My snarking towards players like DesBRO and F-16. The list goes on and on. It was in my iso long before it was in Rancid's. You coulda made a better case for Rancid copying me than you could for me being different from his.
War with AP: looking back at it, nothing stood out to me. I was under the assumption that was how you always acted, not because you are frustrated to the point of giving up.
Fullclaim: you admitted that you gave up on fighting so you can get nightkilled, which was part of your strategy since the beginning. Not a lot of people can differentiate if you were truly frustrated or you were enacting that strategy. Also, fullclaiming doesn't mean you give up on this game.
Rancid: he more effectively vented out his frustrations that even I can notice it through a quick skim/no analysis look.
To be fair, you did not have much of a defense during the time I issued such a suggestion to orc.
Bullfuckingshit. Both Kagura and Rancid have been insisting I'm town (WITH REASONS!) for most of the fucking game.
Apparently from my memory, this occurred much earlier. I already discussed RBD and his hypothetical lack of credibility, and Kagura is not in a good spot assumingly as he is getting assaulted from his neighbours because of his late appearance in Day 1 when the wagon was nearing its end.
You are attacking me on a ground where it is not applicable to the game at hand.
And now you know the crux of what I've been saying about the scumreads on me all fucking game.
You could've clearly stated this in a more dialogical manner and people would have come to understand you. I already mentioned why people are misunderstanding you.
And what's wrong with analyzing and scumreading at the same time?
Because
you offered to enter into a fucking 1v1 against me
. If you analyzed things and found them to be scum, sure. Battle. If you were analyzing things and were beginning to scumread me, you'd point it out but not risk it. Because know what a critical piece of logical, analytical play is? CAUTION. Which you have displayed the entire game. You've shown a lack of commitment to reads, being willing to reconsider them. Meaning that if you hadn't done your analysis? You'd have taken that stance on me.
Instead, you admit you didn't do the analysis...yet you also insist on trying to kill me anyway. From certain players, this might be normal. For a fucking self-admitted logical analytical player, it simply makes zero sense coming from town.
And I'm still considering my reads on you. You are the case of being a misunderstood townie getting kicked around because you refuse to defend yourself and keep provoking (attacking) your attackers. Also, I have not even shown you my analysis; don't rush to conclusions. In fact, my analysis can still be expanded with the introduction of your confrontational attacks on me.
Kill you? No. I wish to understand you. Yet you dismiss such an open outreach because you are convinced I am scum. Unfortunate. Perhaps I am expecting a high level of caution from other players (you) like I had shown.
Likewise, scum can manipulate the trust of others to benefit the team/their personal needs.
The difference, however, is clear. A scum player actively works to gain that trust and manipulates players. You've done that. A town player doesn't actively work to gain that trust and simply assumes it will be there. It was.
This applies to a difference in mafia philosophy/playstyle once again. I suggest you ignore the trust factor in debating against me.
