Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:58 am
^^As Hectic should be able to tell you
If his using trust tells he'll get modkilled since that's against site rules.In post 3478, Hopkirk wrote:Hectic has been known to reference the wiki from time to time JJD is saying.
Hectic is clean because I say so. Throw in some meta and a few trust tells and it'll be fine. Welcome him to our townblock family Carca
I am guessing this was after Garmr claimed but before Carca outed she was Ascetic? Cuz it looks like an attempt to push the Doctor who was expected to claim so as to confirm Garmr.In post 3396, profii wrote:He also says it's confirmed a scum doctor targetted a mason,
Sorry I missed it, but why is Hectic confirmed again?In post 3399, Hopkirk wrote:Proffi is as close to confirmed town as anyone outside Carca/hectic are going to get.
The comment would sit as post 2211 on page 89 if it was here... I'll check for context laterIn post 3485, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:I am guessing this was after Garmr claimed but before Carca outed she was Ascetic? Cuz it looks like an attempt to push the Doctor who was expected to claim so as to confirm Garmr.In post 3396, profii wrote:He also says it's confirmed a scum doctor targetted a mason,
P.S. How does that make Garmr look? I am not sure myself, as I could see it both ways.
to quote myselfIn post 3486, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:Sorry I missed it, but why is Hectic confirmed again?In post 3399, Hopkirk wrote:Proffi is as close to confirmed town as anyone outside Carca/hectic are going to get.
Hectic is clean because I say so.
I'm vouching for him here.
-HHectic is just town.
How would it push the doctor when it was said in a pt?In post 3485, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:In post 3396, profii wrote:He also says it's confirmed a scum doctor targetted a mason,I am guessing this was after Garmr claimed but before Carca outed she was Ascetic? Cuz it looks like an attempt to push the Doctor who was expected to claim so as to confirm Garmr.P.S. How does that make Garmr look? I am not sure myself, as I could see it both ways.
It sure looks like it, and the start of Hopkirk ISO confirms it.In post 3489, Garmr wrote:claiming masons?
THAT is what I was getting at.In post 3491, Garmr wrote:2.Sacrificing himself to get rid of what he thought was a doctor and getting profii lynched as well.
No. That would still be against the rules.In post 3492, Garmr wrote:Can you copy and past everything gobby said with out links. So we can work with it.
It's not if you don't put them in quotes ect and just text only. Because it would be stupid to have it bannable in some circumstances otherwise you would have to reword everything when trying to explain it. My past experiences with mods let me do this. Might be different with every mod so best to ask first.In post 3495, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:No. That would still be against the rules.In post 3492, Garmr wrote:Can you copy and past everything gobby said with out links. So we can work with it.
Can you quit trying to out prs. You saw what happened to the first set of masons. Why are you trying to kill the 'effective masons' now.In post 3493, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:It sure looks like it, and the start of Hopkirk ISO confirms it.In post 3489, Garmr wrote:claiming masons?