Mafiascum.net

I find most of the rest of your reads reasonable aside from Sodatown. Mattman feels honest but has like 2 posts.
Your reasoning for Reckscum isn't really sound, but I agree that he's somewhat suspicious so eh.

Too many people have townreads on Pine. I haven't seen anything he couldn't fake yet.
I don't want to lynch him today anyway though.

Coming in and attacking a guy nobody's really suspicious of in a decently good overall post is good though; Uphill has successfully made a town first-impression.

Equinox is one of my heads.
I think the remaining two will reveal in their games.

I don't know, if one of the leading wagons is on a scumbuddy, I could totally see Uphill coming in and trying to start up a solid counterwagon.

It doesn't matter though because we're lynching triangle today and that vote on implosion is a complete waste.

↑ Uphill wrote:Force, Furc, Pine, Sleepy, Soda, Triangle, and Yates are all town.

yeah no

you have LITERALLY NOTHING TO SAY ABOUT THE TWO BIGGEST WAGONS other than they're all town?

Dear god you're useless

I would also support a Mattman wagon, if Kondi does not pick up steam

Also, Uphill, in his #347, is threatening to bus kondi/mattman imo
I expect 2 of them to be scum AT LEAST, with 1 or 2 of the lurkers scum, and uphill as the 3rd

triangle -- If I really need to explain why this one should be the top lynch then you .

kondi -- The whole "LOL LOOK HOW VI I AM GUYS" play is EXACTLY the same shit kondi pulled when he flipped scum in [redacted].

SleepyKrew -- Something about EVERY POST HE MAKES just seems light and fluffy, like he isn't really trying. I did make a mistake in reading him poorly recently in [redacted], so I'd rather not lynch him.

Force of Nature -- I made a mental note of them being scummy, but they're last on this list because I'm not sure if it's actually being scummy or me just being uberfrustrated with the way the hydra has been confusing people.

Per -- he came in and IGNORED the major wagons, declaring them as town, while focusing on wagons that would be, oh, I dunno, nice counterwagons to his scumbuddy?


Mattman


Pine
Yates
implosion
Grimmjow
Furcolow
Soda

Well, If I'm right under Grimmjow, I'm okay with that.

Force, what do you think of Kondi, if you can find matt to be town? Maybe you are the lurker-whisperer

^I want Equinox to answer, please sign your post

reck, if triangle is scum and soda is town, and uphill wanted to counterwagon, couldn't he, idk, endorse the soda wagon?

uphill is town, by the way.

↑ implosion wrote:reck, if triangle is scum and soda is town, and uphill wanted to counterwagon, couldn't he, idk, endorse the soda wagon?

I considered this, but I also considered that it'd paint a pretty big fucking target on him if he came in the game and threw down a vote on an opposing wagon.

↑ implosion wrote:uphill is town, by the way.

I want answers

why is he town

↑ Force of Nature wrote:
Specifically he had no read on me until he found out who I was, and that information helped him figure out I was town. That is town thought process.

What exactly do you expect scum implosion to do? Just make an arbitrary decision about your alignment and not fake a reason for having that opinion?

Force of Nature wrote:And he's transparent (you can see the town thought process as he just posts what he's thinking) in his other posting too.

Transparent my ass. How can he be transparent when he hasn't said one word about the guy he's voting in forever? That's the complete fucking opposite of transparent!

↑ xRECKONERx wrote:

↑ Uphill wrote:Force, Furc, Pine, Sleepy, Soda, Triangle, and Yates are all town.

yeah no

you have LITERALLY NOTHING TO SAY ABOUT THE TWO BIGGEST WAGONS other than they're all town?

Dear god you're useless

Or maybe I wanted to focus on my scumreads in my ? Take a chill pill, fuckface. I'm getting to my town reads.

By the way, since you're calling me out about not having anything to say about Soda, let's take a look at you've written about him this game:

↑ xRECKONERx wrote:Soda i love you now

↑ xRECKONERx wrote:This Soda wagon is still terrible

↑ xRECKONERx wrote:

NOT GONNA LYNCH:

Soda

Wow, real great job there champ. And you don't even have the excuse of just replacing in. Who's useless now?

↑ Furcolow wrote:Also, Uphill, in his #347, is threatening to bus kondi/mattman imo
I expect 2 of them to be scum AT LEAST, with 1 or 2 of the lurkers scum, and uphill as the 3rd

That's ridiculous. Why would I threaten to bus kondi or mattman? They're lurking AND getting away with it, why the shit wouldn't I just let them continue to get away with it?

Uphill wrote:
What exactly do you expect scum implosion to do? Just make an arbitrary decision about your alignment and not fake a reason for having that opinion?

You mean like i did for soda?

Also, calm down. This is a knife fight.

also, are you an alt, and if not, how much experience do you have?

@Uphill: That's because triangle is scum and Soda is the counterwagon boom it's done he's town

oh
thanks for not answering, implosion
you didnt need to

My read on Soda:

↑ SodaSpirit17 wrote:How? I don't really see the Furco argument as logical, and my RVS wasn't either, so I thought we were still in RVS.

eb4p: cool I'm getting jumped and I just started. Life is GREAT!

↑ SodaSpirit17 wrote:Well? Most 'keyword most' of the people haven't posted enough info to gather much info. The only things eventful that happened were Furcowgon, Grimmjow saying he would quit if Pine was scum, and now this wagon. None of the former 2 were scum-tells.

These are genuine responses to mistaken pressure. Soda explains why he thought the RVS was still ongoing and why he's not voting without any hint of nervousness, despite getting ganged up on here. I doubt he could be this calm and transparent with this much sudden pressure as scum.

The fuck's a lurker whisperer?
I (llamarble) am the only head posting in this thread, so no soup for you.
Kondi may be scum. All she's done so far is make a vote on a lynchable guy with self-inconsistent reasoning.

exactly
that meta was weak

VOTE: Pine
dieDieDIE

My read on Triangle:

↑ triangle123 wrote:Reckoner: Neither you nor FoN said Furcolow is definitely 100% scum, and even though your reasoning for accusing him was, in my opinion, weak, you still gave reasoning to support what you were saying.

↑ triangle123 wrote:Except what you implied regarding your thoughts about Furcolow wasn't as strong as he was saying.

↑ triangle123 wrote:Reck: To me, Grimm sounded more certain that Pine was town than you were of Furcolow being scum. I was also not entirely sure how serious you were being about attacking him over ellipses and decided you were being half-serious, half-not, whereas Grimm sounded entirely serious.

Same as above. Genuine response, no hint of nervousness, calm and transparent, yadda yadda yadda.