Mafiascum.net

Really sorry that I couldn't stay. I was looking forward to this, but all I can say now is
UNVOTE:

and I bid thee adieu.

Sorry

Elmo?

You again?

Haha, now a player I have nothing on got replaced by a player I have 4 days of town meta to look at...

Awesome.

↑ Chrimi wrote:Elmo?

You again?

Haha, now a player I have nothing on got replaced by a player I have 4 days of town meta to look at...

Awesome.

Heh. Hi. Chimi.

I really need to start looking at player lists before I join games.

Hi Slan, Om, Kondi, Kass, VJ. I know half the playerlist /facepalm

FUCK! I just made a reply to asher's case, AND THEN A FUCKING 500 ERROR DECIDED TO BE A BITCH AND ERASE IT ALL!

Excuse me while I vent my anger.

Also hi Elmo.

Ill read this game up when I get back home. Im leaving for work in about 10.

:( I copied the post so I can paste it if I get a 500 error again, but it keeps getting 500 errors when I try to preview it.

I'll try posting it a bit later.

↑ Kassadin wrote:Slandaar and u i think are scum team.
supporting.
ANd my vote stays

WHY though? You have yet to explain properly.

Chrim/Kass makes a ton of sense

I was going to say when I voted kass chrim is a likely buddy but that reaction is just gold.

↑ Om of the Nom wrote:FUCK! I just made a reply to asher's case, AND THEN A FUCKING 500 ERROR DECIDED TO BE A BITCH AND ERASE IT ALL!

Sucks when that happens. Would certainly like to read what you wanted us to read sometime soon (if relevant, natch).

Thomith wrote:

↑ Kassadin wrote:Slandaar and u i think are scum team.
supporting.
ANd my vote stays

WHY though? You have yet to explain properly.

Basing on my previous game with Kassadin and his game here right now, it seems HIGHLY unlikely that he'll post anything that has more than 3 sentences.
We are quite lucky with this quote you used (in which he did wrote three sentences). Let us cherish it.

OK

↑ Chrimi wrote:
OMGUS.

Is there a point to this post?

Why does it matter that I voted someone whos voting me exactly?

↑ Chrimi wrote:

↑ Slandaar wrote:Kass is just a pl and this is how he always plays any assumptions to the contrary are wrong.

He is prob scum though based on poe a bit and his jokey turned serious vote.

Translation:
Kass is town because he is playing his town meta.
But he's probably scum because I can't decide if he was joking or not...

OR... Kass is scum because he is playing his scum meta.
(Kass is a pl)
Why the jump to the conclusion of town? do you think Kass is town?

Naaaah, I don't feel like PL when we have a definite scum on our grasp. Wanna lynch you Slandaar.

↑ Chrimi wrote:
I did not know what to expect, and he didn't really react. A weak reaction at most, I'm pinning it as trying to evade or ignore it. Ergo, scum points.

Chrimi and reaction testing:

I think you are town but im voting you untill you meet my demands.
Pressure by calling said person town; 0. Noone is going to actually stick to a vote on someone they think is town IF they are town themselves.
What reaction would be a town reaction to a no pressure vote exactly Chrimi? coming at you guns blazing? thats a strong reaction right? so thats town? doesnt seem to make much sense especially the tone of your OMGUS post recently.

So my reaction was always destined to get scumpoints wasn't it? your test was not impartial, thereby making you scum.

also explain the benefits of voting me for being antitown over kass for being antitown? who is being more antitown hm?

Oh but whatever alignment kass is as scum you want to keep him alive...

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Chrimi

this guys scum hes just been posting reactionary stuff and done approximately 0 scumhunting.

It actually makes more sense hes defending kass due to kass being useless so as scum he wants to keep him around rather than being buddies, the connection between the 2 is too obvious.

Hmmmm I think for now this is the best thing to do.

VOTE: Slandaar

care to explain other than sheep vijay?
also i am not going to stop asking kass until they give even a slight reason, it is not helping town by going "SLANDAAR IS SCUM OH AND YOUR THE BUDDY" every post.

So if I'm right slans at L-2
Who I replaced had a whopping 4-5 posts.
And I'm caught up on tv from thurs.
So I'm going to sleep now and I'll read this when I get up tomorrow

@ Thomith: give it time. I will.

whats that meant to mean?

I'll explain it. I want Slandaar to post first.

↑ vijay2vasandani wrote:I'll explain it. I want Slandaar to post first.

Coupled with:

↑ vijay2vasandani wrote:Regarding pressure, I believe it's you being short-sighted. Well not short-sighted, but more not considering both sides of the coin. Sure pressure can be imposed in the long term by questioning statements made,

but why wait for that when you can pressure now? Furthermore, shouldn't early pressure provide you with more ammunition for late pressure as scum crack and flail

?

I know you don't have to play the exact same game the same way every time, but it looks like you're doing the same thing others have accused Sland of doing with your vote. From here, it looks like you've shot the volley but are holding back on the follow through, thereby looking good in the town's standing while leaving your vote out to dry.

I guess we just have different play styles. But I'm not sure why you're trying to bait Sland into anything when you could just as easily explain your vote.

so noone else sees chrimis reaction as absolutely ott ridiculous to my kass vote?

like what he said doesnt even make sense its just a bunch of useless last minute 'no wais is kass scum lolz'

vijay slandaar has posted now so i want that explanation please.
also chrimi is a gut town read to me as he is playing how town generally do so...

↑ Slandaar wrote:

↑ Chrimi wrote:
I did not know what to expect, and he didn't really react. A weak reaction at most, I'm pinning it as trying to evade or ignore it. Ergo, scum points.

Chrimi and reaction testing:

I think you are town but im voting you untill you meet my demands.
Pressure by calling said person town; 0. Noone is going to actually stick to a vote on someone they think is town IF they are town themselves.
What reaction would be a town reaction to a no pressure vote exactly Chrimi? coming at you guns blazing? thats a strong reaction right? so thats town? doesnt seem to make much sense especially the tone of your OMGUS post recently.

So my reaction was always destined to get scumpoints wasn't it? your test was not impartial, thereby making you scum.

also explain the benefits of voting me for being antitown over kass for being antitown? who is being more antitown hm?

Oh but whatever alignment kass is as scum you want to keep him alive...

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Chrimi

this guys scum hes just been posting reactionary stuff and done approximately 0 scumhunting.

It actually makes more sense hes defending kass due to kass being useless so as scum he wants to keep him around rather than being buddies, the connection between the 2 is too obvious.

Meet... your... demands?

Bahaha! That's hilarious!

You don't reply to me when I vote or ask you to, and now you expect me to meet your demands?

You make me laugh.

I have scumhunted, I've found you and you only seem to feed my suspicion.

If you find my test impartial, that makes my test bad, not me scum.

You seem to think doing anything makes anybody scum. Somebody gets replaced- must be scum. Somebody defended their town read- must be buddying scum. Everything is scum to you. Also, if you know kass is scum and you think there's a possibility I'm town who wants to keep him alive, then kill kass not me. Serious lack of logic.

Also, you saying that me voting my town read makes no sense and I must be scum- though you're doing it yourself.

Also, the point to my 'omgus' post was because your post REEKS of omgus. He says he thinks you and somebody is scum- and you vote him right away. Perhaps they were on to you? And then, I call you out on it and I'm voting you and think you're scum- so you come up with some bullshit reasons that must make me scum.

Oh, you make me laugh so hard. If he was my scumbuddy, I would never defend him, because that's an obvious tell.