Page 15 of 47
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 7:12 am
by Voidedmafia
In post 346, shos wrote:Are uou for realz?
I hexplained wayyy too much already.
The scumteads are INDEPENDENT. See, by default, if a player is scum and anothee is scum, THAT MAKES THEM A TEAM.
/obviousunneededsnarkycomments.
And no, I don't believe you ever actually explained that scumteam fully. 292 only explains Molla/parama.
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 8:50 am
by shos
That is the point. Ffa i dont get why you all caught on this so hatd. Just pretend i never said anything about syry, kay?
I camt find the quote og ypurs, but anyway, im not using comnections with syry at all. Syry could very well ve an sk or another scumteam. Mollq and parama are mybtheory from.now on aight? Syry is superdipereztraultranull makes you feel better?
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 8:52 am
by Parama
repost that when you get the time plz
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 12:48 pm
by The Rufflig
I think you've gotten everything that you're going to get from Shos on this. I hope you don't mind me interjecting here.
I don't feel those quotes disprove a Syryana - Parama connection. You're overlooking the possible motive of Syryana distancing himself from Parama because of the hammer. I would weight that type of quote more heavily in favor of there not being a connection, if that sort of interaction had happened before Parama's hammer.
As there may be two separate scum teams, I do not understand the push to try and make Shos tie all his suspects together as one scum team. As Shos himself did not try and tie Syryana and Parama together, why make a big deal about these two scum suspects not fitting together?
Somewhat related to the above, Shos case on BBmolla is too weak for me, currently. Sho's case on BBmolla is based on Parama defending BBmolla. If we assume Parama is scum, then we are left with the question of whether his behavior towards BBmolla is the result of buddying up to a townie or actually defending a scum buddy. However, if we assume that Parama is town then we are left with no actual case on BBmolla. I won't support this argument unless Parama flips scum.
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 2:25 pm
by Parama
where am I defending Molla
he's jester
don't lynch him because in xylbot I'm pretty sure jester lynch ends game (could check but)
the end
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 2:45 pm
by BBmolla
Parama there is no jester
shhh...
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 3:38 pm
by Parama
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 3:48 pm
by Voidedmafia
In post 351, shos wrote:That is the point. Ffa i dont get why you all caught on this so hatd. Just pretend i never said anything about syry, kay?
I camt find the quote og ypurs, but anyway, im not using comnections with syry at all. Syry could very well ve an sk or another scumteam. Mollq and parama are mybtheory from.now on aight? Syry is superdipereztraultranull makes you feel better?
Translation:
"That is the point. FFS I don't get why you all caught on this so hard. Just pretend I never said anything about syy, kay?
I can't find the quote of yours, but anyways, I'm not using connections with syry at all. Syry could very well be an sk or another scumteam. Molla and parama are my theory from now on aight? Syry is superduperultranull makes you feel better?"
In response...why mention Syr at all?
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 3:48 pm
by Voidedmafia
In post 353, The Rufflig wrote:As there may be two separate scum teams, I do not understand the push to try and make Shos tie all his suspects together as one scum team. As Shos himself did not try and tie Syryana and Parama together, why make a big deal about these two scum suspects not fitting together?
FYI I was trying to make him explain why the three were together since he suggested it, not force him into that team.
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 4:08 pm
by The Rufflig
Hmmm -- ah, so he did.
In post 292, shos wrote:I'm shooting for a {BBmolla, Parama, Syry} scumteam for the while.
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 5:56 pm
by serrapaladin
In post 354, Parama wrote:where am I defending Molla
he's jester
don't lynch him because in xylbot I'm pretty sure jester lynch ends game (could check but)
the end
Are you being serious?
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 6:15 pm
by Parama
depends
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 6:37 pm
by Kublai Khan
||| MAFIABOT || VOTE COUNT (6 to lynch) |||
||| MAFIABOT || Syryana - 1 (serrapaladin) |||
||| MAFIABOT || shos - 2 (Untrod_Tripod BBmolla) |||
||| MAFIABOT || Untrod_Tripod - 4 (PimHel Syryana Voidedmafia The_Rufflig) |||
||| MAFIABOT || BBmolla - 1 (shos) |||
||| MAFIABOT || Parama - 1 (wind-up) |||
||| MAFIABOT || Living players: BBmolla wind-up Parama PimHel serrapaladin shos Syryana The_Rufflig Untrod_Tripod Voidedmafia |||
||| MAFIABOT || Use command !Prod <name> to prod. |||
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 6:47 pm
by shos
I retead the entire game you know. So i founf patana-molla, and i found syry in an.unrelated way. I just assumed 3 man scumteam as always.
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 6:49 pm
by serrapaladin
Umm, our last Xylbot had two two-man teams...
Also, the obligatory: "depends on what, Para?"
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 8:16 pm
by shos
That happened in.precisely one gamr in my carerr
Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 2:53 am
by Voidedmafia
Yet this is Wacky Xylbot?
Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 6:34 am
by serrapaladin
I'm starting to think scumslip from shos. Last Xylbot AND most testsetups posted here and last game have 2+2 scum...
!vote shos
Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 7:38 am
by BBmolla
^Now we're getting somewhere
Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 8:10 am
by serrapaladin
BB, what do you think of Para insisting you're a jester?
Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 8:11 am
by BBmolla
Hilarious
Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 8:12 am
by BBmolla
UT aint a bad lynch actually.
Serious answer is I think Parama is disconnected from this game as I am and is grasping at the one thing he does remember feeling
So probably town
Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 8:15 am
by serrapaladin
I honestly don't see much difference between UT and Para. UT feels equally disconnected, and Para has the derphammer to be held against him.
Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 8:17 am
by BBmolla
We could lynch UT and get wagon analysis from that
Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 8:21 am
by serrapaladin
Nah, then we might as well lynch shos.