Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 8:04 am
Good. That's the point.
How does that help us?In post 350, goodmorning wrote:Good. That's the point.
I already had you as a town read and this post solidifies it. Not only because of the vote, but also because you noticing the "non-answers" tendency (as you put it) shows that you've been reading the conversation.In post 347, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:It's been good for the rest of us I think. In your exchange I have found reinforcement of my suspicion of him, specifically his precedent of "non-answers".
VOTE: A_Stone
In post 350, goodmorning wrote:Good. That's the point.
Just out of curiosity if you found Syndrome’s behavior “troubling” and it didn’t sit right with you why didn’t you vote for him? Are you going to follow your own advice and withhold your vote until a viable lynch option materializes even if it’s not one of your strong scum reads?In post 341, A_Stone wrote:I feel that you're poking fun at people for wanting to vote 2 for his posting.In post 334, syndromeofatown wrote:Who else thinks we should policy lynch ^2 for spamming?
So yeah...
Anyone else find it troubling that Syndrome has time to write why he unvoted me, and yet doesn't have enough time to write why he voted someone else :/
And even if he'd found me as less scummy than Rach, why would he follow a lynch that didn't have support instead of one that was a viable lynch option, it just doesn't sit right with me.
Your assumption would be less than correct.In post 353, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:I am assuming you are waiting for rach, who has been less than active in other places i've been as well.
How in the world do you have a Null read on me?In post 356, Mr E Roll wrote:GM and RC are nullish reads that I throw into the town pile by POE.
I can understand why. I thought you were probably town, but you've been acting weird and dragging out your little ploy to some great reveal. That doesn't help, not now and not later. If you are trying to figure someone out, put a vote down. There's nothing like a good vote to get someone talking.In post 357, goodmorning wrote:Your assumption would be less than correct.In post 353, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:I am assuming you are waiting for rach, who has been less than active in other places i've been as well.
How in the world do you have a Null read on me?In post 356, Mr E Roll wrote:GM and RC are nullish reads that I throw into the town pile by POE.
I think this is a bit narrow, but I do agree with essentially all of your reads, including the null ones.In post 356, Mr E Roll wrote:I think both scum can be found in some configuration of TNE, Syndrome and A_Stone. Individually each one has looked scummy. I just don’t know which combination is most likely.
I have. I am intentionally obfuscating to clarify my position on a certain player(s) to myself in hopes of being able to present evidence of it to everyone.In post 359, Mr E Roll wrote:Maybe if you starting sharing your thought processes it would be easier to get a firm read on you.
well, then don't get excited when people read you as null.In post 361, goodmorning wrote:I have. I am intentionally obfuscating to clarify my position on a certain player(s) to myself in hopes of being able to present evidence of it to everyone.In post 359, Mr E Roll wrote:Maybe if you starting sharing your thought processes it would be easier to get a firm read on you.
There goes all respect I ever had for you, Rach. Good job insinuating that people being active doesn't have a "real life" outside of mafia games. You probably couldn't have been more insulting even if you tried.In post 366, RachMarie wrote:hey guys someo of us do have RL outside of mafia games
its so fucking obvious you two are scum together I seriously just fucking lost all interest in this game.In post 367, ² wrote:There goes all respect I ever had for you, Rach. Good job insinuating that people being active doesn't have a "real life" outside of mafia games. You probably couldn't have been more insulting even if you tried.
I remember buldermar making a very similar comment to another player who said something about having a real life that takes precedence over mafia. I can't remember what game it was in, unfortunately.In post 372, syndromeofatown wrote:its so fucking obvious you two are scum together I seriously just fucking lost all interest in this game.In post 367, ² wrote:There goes all respect I ever had for you, Rach. Good job insinuating that people being active doesn't have a "real life" outside of mafia games. You probably couldn't have been more insulting even if you tried.
I think I can see why you'd interpret things that way. However, I have before been insulted by the snarky "I'm inactive because unlike you I have a life" comment, and it pisses me off. I don't really know what to tell you other than that it's absolutely sincere.In post 372, syndromeofatown wrote:its so fucking obvious you two are scum together I seriously just fucking lost all interest in this game.In post 367, ² wrote:There goes all respect I ever had for you, Rach. Good job insinuating that people being active doesn't have a "real life" outside of mafia games. You probably couldn't have been more insulting even if you tried.