Mafiascum.net

In post 344, borkjerfkin wrote:VOTE: MC Ride

Policy lynch: I'm worried about a no lynch at this point, we've obviously got some positive utility roles; let's let them do what they do.

This is what we are doing.

^Major problems with this post. You're worried about a no lynch, so you unvote someone you suspect from L-2 to put a different player at L-3? And it's not even someone you think is scum, but just a "policy lynch"?

In post 346, fferyllt wrote:Tempted to lynch vote you purely because you directed me to your wiki where you don't link to your games, you just list them as text, and you don't label them by alignment.

What can I say, I'm lazy.

since we have 2 extra days
UNVOTE:

Given the deadline extension, who else would be willing to go for a goodmorning lynch today?

In post 350, Kdub wrote:^Major problems with this post. You're worried about a no lynch, so you unvote someone you suspect from L-2 to put a different player at L-3? And it's not even someone you think is scum, but just a "policy lynch"?

Um, considering the role claim from him, it's pretty fucking obvious why I did this.

In post 353, borkjerfkin wrote:Um, considering the role claim from him, it's pretty fucking obvious why I did this.

I get why his claim makes him a policy lynch, but that doesn't explain your worrying about a no lynch due to the deadline or your comment about power roles (especially given BRO's claim).

Because I'm going to get nigh guaranteed support for MC Ride, where fferyllt just said in the post prior she was having second thoughts about BRO.

heh. trajectory.

With another two days, maybe we can do better than policy.

WOOHOO TWO MORE DAYSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS.

Yeah the extension changes the game.

UNVOTE:

re: Goodmorning: The only issue I have with goodmorning is the sudden surety of the Kdub scumread to the point where she won't even entertain the fact that he might be town who might be able to demonstrate <something>. Otherwise I think she's been one of the more movey-shaky players.

She has a point about no VT. Unless there is scum already among the three claimed anti-town town roles, we are going to see PR claims. Possibly even accurate ones aside from alignment. PR claim alone shouldn't be enough to dissuade a lynch.

I guess my only question is whether a claim of an unspecified ability should be good enough to move on.

Amethyst Snowflake unvoted.

In post 355, borkjerfkin wrote:Because I'm going to get nigh guaranteed support for MC Ride, where fferyllt just said in the post prior she was having second thoughts about BRO.

Fair enough.

In post 359, fferyllt wrote:PR claim alone shouldn't be enough to dissuade a lynch.

This is true. If you want to lynch me today in spite of what I've already claimed, I don't think a full claim is going to change your mind. I maintain that my reasons for claiming what I did when I did was town motivated, despite how GM tries to spin it.

ffery, how do you feel about a GM wagon today?

This game needs more TMT and ArcAngel.

In post 362, Kdub wrote:

In post 355, borkjerfkin wrote:Because I'm going to get nigh guaranteed support for MC Ride, where fferyllt just said in the post prior she was having second thoughts about BRO.

Fair enough.

In post 359, fferyllt wrote:PR claim alone shouldn't be enough to dissuade a lynch.

This is true. If you want to lynch me today in spite of what I've already claimed, I don't think a full claim is going to change your mind. I maintain that my reasons for claiming what I did when I did was town motivated, despite how GM tries to spin it.

ffery, how do you feel about a GM wagon today?

This game needs more TMT and ArcAngel.

Right now, the player I am most uneasy about is ArcAngel.

In post 362, Kdub wrote:
This game needs more TMT

Doesn't every game?

That being said, I'm catching up now.

AA's content

In post 261, ArcAngel9 wrote:I am town Fferlyn, don't struggle.. I need to check if you're town or not.

I am not having good feeling about bork, he is always scum when i am town. Bork, lets talk!!!

Certainly upholding that townclaim.
Also, what an attack on bork.

In post 265, ArcAngel9 wrote:^ not entirely but i am not going trust him quickly. He is a very good manipulator. if he scum, you won't see it at all.

How about that wifom

In post 312, ArcAngel9 wrote:

In post 286, borkjerfkin wrote:I would think that Town!AA would read the game and read my slot instead of latching onto this gambler's fallacy thing. It's fine as a running joke in RVS but this is page 12 and she all but admitted she's suspicious of me for "I've been good as scum before" which she should not be allowed to use as a crutch to avoid actually reading me (or apparently anyone else).

are you trying to frame me bork?
I am busy till Tuesday, if you were reading you would know this.

What a defense

I can see where AA's making uneasy, but I would rather more content before a lynch- but based on AA's current content, I'm fine with a lynch on AA.

TMT, what is your opinion on me/BRO/GM?

@AA.

Your presence, reads etc. would be really cool about now.

Whew.

UNVOTE: BRO

@Kdub: Ughhhhhh I am getting very tired of trying to get across to you that your twisting my words doesn't help anything.

@AA9 and MC: Where do you stand today?

In post 358, borkjerfkin wrote:re: Goodmorning: The only issue I have with goodmorning is the sudden surety of the Kdub scumread to the point where she won't even entertain the fact that he might be town who might be able to demonstrate <something>. Otherwise I think she's been one of the more movey-shaky players.

Considering his continued attempts to misrep me I am quite sure and it is less than sudden.
What do you think of him at the moment?

Would be really cool if MC, letters, or AA9 would contribute more >:C

the last vote on AA is pretty opportunistic tbh

In post 369, goodmorning wrote:@Kdub: Ughhhhhh I am getting very tired of trying to get across to you that your twisting my words doesn't help anything.

This is coming from someone who makes up stuff (about me claiming at L-3 when I was at L-2) to justify your inconsistent stance on me/BRO, as well as accusing me of "chainsawing" when I suspected you long before you even mentioned me as a suspect. Sorry, you don't get to paint me exposing flaws in your arguments as "twisting" or "misrep" when YOU have flat out lied about the facts and failed to back up your accusations. Your attempt to push through my lynch under deadline pressure failed, and you are now trying to play the victim and resorting to broad generalizations like "misrep" without any substance behind it.

I also realized after looking over the rules that we have a plurality lynch at the deadline. So there is no need to compromise today with an MC or AA lynch or whatever people want to put out there.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: goodmorning

I will not be voting for anyone other than GM or BRO today, and I would only switch back to BRO if it's a "him or me" situation.