Mafiascum.net

Hi Wayne.

I see you ignored every single question I asked you.


Beli, that's not the "Amished tell" as I understand it, and gamblers fallacy is not a fallacy when someone claims a statistical impossibility but it's ok we now know Wayne lied about it anyway.

BS asked no question worth a response. I'm not in the practice of knowingly trying to convince scum of anything because it just goes in circles.

...why doesn't waynegg have more votes?
~SD

Guys, when someone says "I never rolled scum" it doesnt affect his current alignment.

Bel, that wasnt amished. Amished is him saying "Im sorry for the scummy things my predecessor did" which didnt happen. I feel like you've been softly chainsawing wayne.


Saki, stop. Place a serious vote dammit, theres a nice spot here in the wayne wagon, we kept your seat warm.

Meanwhile, wayne calls Jason scum but doesnt vote for him. Niiice.

DP

You know, I asked the mod that and he said he wouldn't give me a vote multiplier. Good question though.

I can only vote one scum at a time. Why would I remove my vote from one scum just to put it on a different scum? That's just silly. Nice soft push to start confusing the vote though!

In post 353, waynegg wrote:BS asked no question worth a response.

Why do you lie?
Why did you lie?

In post 297, Karnage wrote:

In post 292, Skullduggery wrote:

In post 154, Karnage wrote:I wouldn't have wasted my time reading through that shit if she would have just clarified her "reason" instead of arguing semantics. Plus I find sheeping scummy.

How are these two sentences related? The word "plus" implies that they're connected in some way, but Sakura wasn't sheeping anybody.

They are the reasons for my vote. And Sakura was clearly sheeping Jason:

In post 28, Sakura Hana wrote:Looks like he also has to rhyme or sound like a song or something in addition to capitalizing the last word,

also I agree with that vote

[post=waynegg]waynegg[/post]

Why do I feel like i'm the only Normal person here?

So do you think that this vote that she cast during RVS is more significant than the entire conversation she had with Waynegg after that?

In post 322, boxxy wrote:(SORRY BUSY WEEKEND. CATCHING UP.)

You used this same excuse when you were Scum in Calvin & Hobbes Mafia. You have until page 20 to convince me that your alignment is different in this game.

In post 357, waynegg wrote:I can only vote one scum at a time. Why would I remove my vote from one scum just to put it on a different scum?

Have you given Jasonwazza and Sakura/Baby Spice the same re-read treatment that you gave Desperado? I'd like to know how strong your conviction is here.

In post 358, Baby Spice wrote:

In post 353, waynegg wrote:BS asked no question worth a response.

Why do you lie?
Why did you lie?

Trying to understand your thought process is like trying to smell the color "9".

Wayne:

Why do you lie?
Why did you lie?
Why do you refuse to answer questions?
Why did you call Sakura's vote on you way back when "Baseless"?

I don't
I didn't
Only the stupid ones
Because she ave no reason for it being a serious vote, never did, and you've done no better a serious vote has to have reasoning behind it. A vote without reasoning of some sort IS, by definition, BASELESS. She never gave a reason, ergo baseless

You did.
You still do.
Looks more like you are trying to avoid pertinant questions to me.

Wrong. A vote in which you think you gave nothing for it to be based on is what you would call baseless, and your reaction to it is classic scum. Hell your description of it as "Baseless" as opposed to "reasonless" is what made you look scummy at the time. Especially as she gave her reason when she voted!

Your further actions to continue to attack it, and Sakura, and myself, in the denigrating style that you have is also scummy as hell.

You claim things that are impossibe as an appeal to both emotion and expertese.
You back down when called on them, changing the specifics to try and maintain the veracity of them.
You exagerated things as a further appeal, and have now refused to address the pertinant points raised about those.claims.

In post 355, SalmonellaDoctor wrote:Saki, stop. Place a serious vote dammit, theres a nice spot here in the wayne wagon, we kept your seat warm.

NO

You were the perfect replacement for Sakura. Are you an alt by any chance?

In post 29, Sakura Hana wrote:And that's what I get for posting half asleep
VOTE: waynegg

In post 28, Sakura Hana wrote:Looks like he also has to rhyme or sound like a song or something in addition to capitalizing the last word, also I agree with that vote
[post=waynegg]waynegg[/post]

Why do I feel like i'm the only Normal person here?

So, it was serious because she was sheeping, ergo baseless

And then a couple of posts later she said it was serious. Since the reason she gave in her actual vote was far from serious, asking her reasoning for it to be a serious vote was, and still is, a fair question. Which neither she nor you can answer. In fact your whole argument on me is omgus based because I'm voting your slot and pushed the case.

In post 365, waynegg wrote:You were the perfect replacement for Sakura. Are you an alt by any chance?

I. AM. NOT. A. CHEAT!

OMG! That was so obviously a joke.

I am reading these 15 pages currently, because I apparently am an idiot who forgets things

things like this game.

In post 366, waynegg wrote:So, it was serious because she was sheeping, ergo baseless

Silly me, but it would be serious becasue she said it was serious, you decided to call it not serious by the way.

Even if it was sheeping, that still would not prevent it from being serious.

But here you go, denigration and semantics again.

In post 367, waynegg wrote:And then a couple of posts later she said it was serious. Since the reason she gave in her actual vote was far from serious, asking her reasoning for it to be a serious vote was, and still is, a fair question. Which neither she nor you can answer. In fact your whole argument on me is omgus based because I'm voting your slot and pushed the case.

Sometimes I wonder why I bother.

As I just said, it was actually before your question that she first said it was serious, not after.
Nothing in her comments when she posted indicates that it was not a serious vote.
You did not actually ask her "reasoning for it to be a serious vote", as you claim you did. What you did actually ask was why a baseless vote should be considered serious, and she answered it fairly quickly with "It is not a baseless vote" ergo, your question was invalid right from the get go. Indeed your question was designed to denigrate Sakura's vote. That is a scum motivated action.
I have not OMGUS'ed you in any way. You would know that if you bothered to actually read anything since I have laid out several reasons why you are scum. Reasons that you still refuse to address from what I see. Claiming OMGUS as a means of refusing to address a case on you is also a scum act.


Now, please stop with the personal attacks, the denigration, the insults, and either address the questions asked or admit you are scum.

^dat misrep

I said

A baseless vote (one eith no given serious reason in other words) should be considered serious (a vote which has actual, logical reasoning behind it) (e.g. Give the fucking reasoning behind the vote)?

Which is the exact same thing as

Why are you voting for me?

Now please, learn to read and what words, particularly in context, actually mean. Or better yet, just sheep the good players.

My God, it gets tiring having this exact same conversation over and over. You're scum. You replaced into a scum slot. And I'm beginning to realize at this point why you're a D1 policy kill.

*with