Mafiascum.net

In post 335, Humble Poirot wrote:All I need to know that in games like "Mini 1480: Uncreative Paradise", when you're pressured you talk and that your lurking, joking around and not playing is not just meta and can perfectly be a scum-tactic.

In post 345, Humble Poirot wrote:When did Stubbs found him?

In post 345, Humble Poirot wrote:Who wrote 303?

In post 345, Humble Poirot wrote:Could you/him/both (This is confusing) have written DB as scum earlier than 308?

In post 347, notscience wrote:I say we wagon Dessew-scum, because as HP said we're too far apart and it's risking a deadline scramble.

In post 163, Humble Poirot wrote: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

@artemiskitty:

You're a machine of calling people town without actually bothering to explain why. In fact, you don't even explain why you think people are scum either.

In post 168, Mario and the Diamonds wrote:Ew.

In post 356, artemiskitty wrote:

In post 163, Humble Poirot wrote: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

@artemiskitty:

You're a machine of calling people town without actually bothering to explain why. In fact, you don't even explain why you think people are scum either.

that's not true. i said in post 160 why i thought SOS might be scum. the only person at that point that i thought could be scum.
am just rereading, and i do think up to this point in the thread, dessew is looking a little odd. his sticky vote on HC, until he responded, while in the meantime fanning the flames on the whole 'fuz is scum' thing.
i had/have fuz is town because i think he asked a fair question of SOS, and it somehow got turned around on him. his reactions to it seemed fine to me, and kinda justified.

In post 169, Rail Tracer wrote:

artemis wrote:^i keep reading fuzduzn's posts as towntowntown

i haven't been scumreading fuduzn since about p5, but for the purposes of gauging reactions, i've been quiet about my read reversing on him. i am a sucker for ate that looks genuine. i still want his current reads. and i think he needs to tone down on the overreacting because i'm getting sick of it regardless of his alignment.

In post 169, Rail Tracer wrote:

artemis wrote:VOTE: S.O.S

i'm not in agreement with some of sos's reads, and i'm not currently town reading him, but i don't see the scum in his posts.

is this just because of the way he's attacking fuduzn? what do you think of some of the other players who are currently voting fuduzn (particularly dessew and hc)?

In post 358, Sound of Silence wrote:

In post 356, artemiskitty wrote:

In post 163, Humble Poirot wrote: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

@artemiskitty:

You're a machine of calling people town without actually bothering to explain why. In fact, you don't even explain why you think people are scum either.

that's not true. i said in post 160 why i thought SOS might be scum. the only person at that point that i thought could be scum.
am just rereading, and i do think up to this point in the thread, dessew is looking a little odd. his sticky vote on HC, until he responded, while in the meantime fanning the flames on the whole 'fuz is scum' thing.
i had/have fuz is town because i think he asked a fair question of SOS, and it somehow got turned around on him. his reactions to it seemed fine to me, and kinda justified.

Your vote is pretty stale.

In post 176, Rail Tracer wrote:

hp wrote:Explain why the scumhunting isn't genuine and offer examples of people with genuine scumhunting (and, if there are, people with fake scumhunting as well).

i don't think it's genuine

because i don't see you properly analysing motivation.

as a general rule, i consider people who try to read between the lines of posts to be genuinely scum hunting.

examples in this game? nacho-hydra, sos, artemis. to some extent, isaac.

i liked mario's post on hc, too. incidentally, outside of sos i think these players are town (sos i'm thinking could be town but i have a gut nagging that's not letting me put him in my town list)

.

In post 179, Dessew wrote:HP is the first one who comes into my mind. His #163 is off as I reread it. I mean the parts about Fu. He lists a couple of things saying that he's scummy, and actually calls him scummy, but he votes HC because of that lie thing, and keeps pushing you. As if he didn't want to take a stand, only give something little everywhere. I'm gonna think a little more about it.

In post 182, notscience wrote:VOTE: Dessew

HI GIF HI FFERY HI NACHO HI MALA (kitty in name obv mala)

Upon reading, I agree with HP's statement about hydrae (although admittedly I do it myself).

I'm liking Fu SoS and HP For town thus far

Fu because the selfdefeatism is something I've seen all over the place thus far coming predominately from town

SoS because they're trying to interact and get reads on people (such as nacho) that they want to get sorted out

HP because I like some of the ideas he's brought up, the whole "hydrae are harder to read tidbit" seems like a townslip. He addressed it early rather than save it for later and try to use it against someone which feels incredibly protown. Plus, I was like "omghao2readhydrae" my first game with one in it (I was town)

DB is leaning town because his wall looks really good, it has some nice points. There's also a town-vibe I'm getting, but he has only had that one post so that's why he is only in leaning atm. One pro-townpost does not a town make.

Dessew is feeling scum to me. He voteparks for a reason, says "I want to see him react" (which in and of itself kills all reactions) and then his reason- "I was reactiontesting." It also feels like he's more into calling people town and not trying to find scum.

Mario feels weird. He's not under any fire and yet "If you dont like when I post just lynch me" seems very forced. Like a forceful way of trying to say "I don't care if I die"

Kitty is leaning scum. It seems for someone with 14 posts they only have 1 townread and 1 scumread. It kinda looks like they're trying to buddy up to fu.

Saki is VERY SLIGHTLY leaning town for me because of the reaction test.

Brian is leaning scum, I don't really see any stances from him. He's discussing but not presenting any reads. Most of his stuff is based around hydrae which is weird to me. Keying in on hydrae and no reads add up weird in my head.

Rail is null for me.

Nachohydra looks town, based on vibes and points that were brought up that I agreed with upon reading.

HC is null for me as well, mainly because I misread him last game and want to see more from him to compare.

In post 193, notscience wrote:No, I've been back and forth in my head like mad.

In post 204, notscience wrote:He seems to be doing a lot of theory and common debacles (ate being a scumtell (WHICH IT ISNT), Lynch all "liars" even though at that point it really isn't anything substantial. At best, it's an associative if either flips scum. But however, that in and of itself doesn't make him scum.

I'll be totally honest, I read him flipping shit about hydrae and the bit about Saki lying and wrote him off as town (I only skimmed his ISO because majority of his posts are walls, but am rereading them now)

Although I disagree with his points and I feel like he's blatantly wrong about things, he's being kinda persistent with what he's said which gives good vibes. (Take for example, his persistence accusation of HC lying about mario or Fu's AtE)

It's strange how he has only stated two townreads and even those were "early" townreads.

Hmmm.

In post 239, Daniel Bryan wrote:Well its ironic that Rail Tracer has been accusing HP of hiding behind the hydra discussion when the attempts at scumhunting are there and the only reason HP keeps talking about hydras is because Rail Tracer keeps bringing them up. Makes sense? Also, what is iioa?

Ik Brian, whats problematic here is that you initially didnt say anything about his hydra statement until people said they didnt agree with some of it, your post agreeing to a part of it looks like it supports the whole statement.

Idk what it is, but I feel like notscience is too agreeable here, Im getting a light scum read on his slot. I dont like his attack on kitty by saying that they have 14 posts, ergo they must be scum.
I think he may have a point about Dessew but Im having a gut scum read on him.

In post 286, Humble Poirot wrote:

@artemiskitty:

Besides calling some people town and voting SOS, I don't see that much from you. How confident are you SOS is scum? Why aren't you either pushing him or trying to convince others to vote him?

In post 369, Rail Tracer wrote:somebody needs to do this.

C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER

ns wrote:His reads post was kinda bad, but I want to know what you guys are seeing that I'm not.

In post 272, Sound of Silence wrote:

In post 268, Rebel Without a Pulse wrote:I have told Nacho I was townreading you, he agreed with me. What disruptions are you talking about exactly?

In post 268, Rebel Without a Pulse wrote:Stubbs.

In post 217, notscience wrote:HP what's your opinion on Dessew thus far?

In post 271, notscience wrote:Stubbs what are you thinking of Dessew thus far?