I do actually find PRs troublesome, but that's just personal preference. Like I say, though, more a discussion for postgame.In post 310, CrisP wrote:, do you also find power roles problematic? Because in that case we can just just use a random generator for lynches and see if we win the game. Jokes aside, every strategy in mafia uses incomplete information, so it's always going to be fallible, this does not mean you can't use it and most of the time if it's a reasonable strategy it will help you.Goodmorning wrote:And I find VCA to be problematic for a whole mess of other reasons, but that's more a discussion for postgame.
You certainly have a point.It's too early to say, at the very least it provides a lot of information. For instance, after having read your answers and some of your mafia defences I can say you are either upping your game here and fooling me our my accusations are wrong, still thinking about it. Look at it from my POV:Goodmorning wrote: And how is that working out for you so far?
- Day 1 you only gave away reads when prodded, in answer to someone prodding you, or discussed theory points with us, which I guess is your way of being a dutiful IC so a nul.
- You have also been very wishy washy in your posts, you keep on saying stuff like, on the one hand x, but on the other hand y, which is very annyoing for townies because we don't know what you mean so you create confusion and very handy as a mafia player cause you can always reference one of the parts if you get under some heat.
- You said you weren't playing your best game, something often done to cover slip ups.
- You joined both bandwagons
- The only votes you started where on things other people thought poor, BW's immuno joke and my mistake about DC's role in the first setup.
Doesn't this look scummy to you?
-I suppose I have been a bit distracted recently. I could say this was strategic of me, but it wasn't.
-I do that a lot. Sometimes I have reads I'm not sure of, and to put down exactly what I think and why can help me sort it or jog something in someone else who can.
-In all honesty, I haven't played a game I'd call "good" since AMURIKA (until my recent Donner Party, but that was largely in part to a good team).
-So I did.
-argumentum ad populum
Not a lot.It's a possible strategy, so did you get something from his day 1 after letting him relax? If the only thing you are going with is the immuno vote you'll have to agree it's a pretty weak read, at least from a logical point of view.Goodmorning wrote: I was watching. Some people are the type who crack under pressure, but others are the type who relax too far when there's no pressure at all.
Logic isn't the only way to scumhunt.
I'm not denying I'm one of the reasons.See that's in part my problem. You were the one who stopped it dead in it's tracks, if you had kept your vote on him then I would have argued with BW that even if he liked JM's defence JM made much more sense from a strategic point of view, his reaction then would have been telling. Let's also not forget we could all be townies going at each other, a possibility which you seem to be ignoring.Goodmorning wrote:But she flipped green, so I'm looking again at the reasons the jmo wagon failed.
I don't know who "all" is, but I know what my reads are and I don't tend to think of all situations in hypotheticals.
In time.In post 312, Buckwild wrote:GM: I want to hear more from GM on why he has such high suspicions of me.
In post 321, jmo16mla wrote:I find it rather stupid to not vote your top scum read... You should really think about what you just said.
Anybody see a problem with these two posts?In post 324, jmo16mla wrote:Now, if I had to guess, scum team would be GM and maybe arc/brian.
VOTE: brian
I'm offended.In post 329, jmo16mla wrote:I guess I have to take over as IC since nacho is dead and any other SE isnt helping.
That said, it's definitely a bad idea to lynch anyone til AA9 posts stuff.
This is stupid. Some players are like that. See Guyett's famous drunkhammers (as Town).In post 334, jmo16mla wrote:I'm not the mod, I'm telling you, and anyone else in this game that if I'm lynched without declaring intent hammer, and giving me a chance, then they need to be auto lynched tomorrow. No if ands or butts.
In fact, most policy lynches are stupid, and tend to get more so the further into the game it gets.
That said, I would definitely give the side-eye to someone who hammered here without intent.