↑shos wrote:it means that the vote was not honest, it was there for a purpose, and you saw it.
Then this is just crappy. Why on earth would someone townie put in a deliberately confusing vote? All it is going to do is draw attention to you. VOTE: shos
You been on site since 2006 and you seriously making that post?
Not sure what you are getting at. I called someone out for being untownish, he admitted it, still think he looks bad.
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 10:01 am
by geraintm
↑BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I could vote him but it would be on the premise that he is lurking and I don't feel comfortable with that at this early stage. Sure, if his behaviour continues and nothing improves in terms of his posting frequency and the content of his posts, I'll gladly jump on that wagon.
This post, when compared to his 333 and his reasons for voting aronis, just make me want to stick a badge on his lapel with hypocrite written on it or something....
you realize this game has been going on longer than we have days left in the day phase right? How long are you going to be content with letting a scummy player lurk?
No, I didn't realise that. The small number of pages must have threw me off, I thought we were only 4 or 5 days in.
This is a quiet D1.
OK, time for some pressure.
VOTE: PB
Wait, the guy who 2 posts above is voting for someone for poorly times votes and hopping onto bandwagons does this...?
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 10:05 am
by geraintm
↑shos wrote:because it is both a sheep, and a bad question reactions, and a horrible reason to vote a person, and a silent jump on a rising wagon.
No comment then on the toffeeman joining onto a rising wagon after beck basically egged him to doing it?
Double standards....
↑shos wrote:it means that the vote was not honest, it was there for a purpose, and you saw it.
Then this is just crappy. Why on earth would someone townie put in a deliberately confusing vote? All it is going to do is draw attention to you. VOTE: shos
You been on site since 2006 and you seriously making that post?
Not sure what you are getting at. I called someone out for being untownish, he admitted it, still think he looks bad.
I said it wasn't a real vote. it was fishing for reactions. just like your reaction. get it now?
I can't help but wonder if you're pretending or not, because again, your joindate is 2006.
↑shos wrote:it means that the vote was not honest, it was there for a purpose, and you saw it.
Then this is just crappy. Why on earth would someone townie put in a deliberately confusing vote? All it is going to do is draw attention to you. VOTE: shos
You been on site since 2006 and you seriously making that post?
Not sure what you are getting at. I called someone out for being untownish, he admitted it, still think he looks bad.
I said it wasn't a real vote. it was fishing for reactions. just like your reaction. get it now?
I can't help but wonder if you're pretending or not, because again, your joindate is 2006.
↑shos wrote:because it is both a sheep, and a bad question reactions, and a horrible reason to vote a person, and a silent jump on a rising wagon.
No comment then on the toffeeman joining onto a rising wagon after beck basically egged him to doing it?
Double standards....
well I can't vote two peeps. one by one.
I started in 2006 but had a huge gap in the middle. I play one game at a time. I am not high level player or anything. Things others think are obvious I just wont
↑shos wrote:it means that the vote was not honest, it was there for a purpose, and you saw it.
Then this is just crappy. Why on earth would someone townie put in a deliberately confusing vote? All it is going to do is draw attention to you. VOTE: shos
You been on site since 2006 and you seriously making that post?
Not sure what you are getting at. I called someone out for being untownish, he admitted it, still think he looks bad.
So you think he's scum deliberately drawing attention to himself?
Do you think its plausible that he was trying to guage reactions?
↑Beck wrote: Prolapsed is scum but idk how else to convince people.
Let's pretend for a moment that PB is mod-confirmed town. Where else are you willing to look?
↑Dr Pants wrote:read through BBT's posts. Overly active doesnt just mean post count. In this case, I mean specifically that hes very quickly moving from wagon to wagon. He isn't sitting on a consistent idea or train of thought, and seems to be just going for whatever the biggest wagon is.
I've explained every one of my votes. If you have issue with them, take me up on it. Otherwise, stop pushing reasons for why I'm scum that have already been explained and are no longer valid.
I dont like Dr Pants very much atm. But my gut still says he's prob town.
I don't like Aronis at all so far. His ISO is full of fluff and lacking any sort of scum-hunting. His votes have been pretty badly timed with bad explanations and now he's sheeping onto PB.
you realize this game has been going on longer than we have days left in the day phase right? How long are you going to be content with letting a scummy player lurk?
No, I didn't realise that. The small number of pages must have threw me off, I thought we were only 4 or 5 days in.
I dont like Dr Pants very much atm. But my gut still says he's prob town.
This is a very scummy post. Taking another player's word on alignment (AKA sheeping) is very lazy and something scum do. A lot.
shos isn't looking terribly town right now, either.
BBT, do you have any reason to vote me other than lurking? Or supposed "lack" of content?
I feel like you're just shadily trying to you OMGUS me for voting you, so you can jump on my wagon at a moments notice, finishing me off and avoiding the heat.
↑shos wrote:because it is both a sheep, and a bad question reactions, and a horrible reason to vote a person, and a silent jump on a rising wagon.
What's wrong with sheeping? Okay. K. Ummm. Silent? Like I can't secret vote.
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 3:54 pm
by Aronis
↑Desperado wrote:Looking forward to seeing Aronis swing
I oinda think this is just your play, if I remember right. But this feels rather creepy. Anyways, could you elaborate?
I dont like Dr Pants very much atm. But my gut still says he's prob town.
This is a very scummy post. Taking another player's word on alignment (AKA sheeping) is very lazy and something scum do. A lot.
shos isn't looking terribly town right now, either.
BBT, do you have any reason to vote me other than lurking? Or supposed "lack" of content?
I feel like you're just shadily trying to you OMGUS me for voting you, so you can jump on my wagon at a moments notice, finishing me off and avoiding the heat.
I'm not scumreading you (yet), so I'm not really planning on jumping onto your wagon at any point in the near future. I was just pointing out a very anti-town thing you did.
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:35 pm
by Double Trouble
Trouble head dodging. Desp still scum.
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 10:29 pm
by Beck
Looking at aronis's ISO, I'm not seeing why people are scum reading him.
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 3:56 am
by BlueBloodedToffee
↑geraintm wrote:
Wait, the guy who 2 posts above is voting for someone for poorly times votes and hopping onto bandwagons does this...?
Why are you acting like I have no reasons for voting PB?
The following makes it look like you were scum-reading DT;
Spoiler: Aronis scum-reading DT
↑Aronis wrote:
This is a really really really good point. Titus rarely, if ever lurks. Usually she is one of the most active people in game.
VOTE: DoubleTrouble
↑Aronis wrote:
And I was just moving my vote around to see what happens. Unfortunately, I found the explanation of 'We're trying to actively lurk and cant explain why' not very reassuring, so my vote stays there.
What changed? Did PB suddenly become more scummy or did DT become more townie? Because I don't see you stating either, just sheeping.
↑Aronis wrote:
Ummm. What changed about your read on me?
My read on you changed? Given those votes have pretty much been your whole contribution to this thread, I see nothing that makes you look town to me, only scum.
As for why I'm voting PB;
Spoiler: Why I'm voting PB
↑BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
I do agree with what Beck is saying. PB's confirmation post felt all kinds of wrong
↑shos wrote:
BBT: explain to me how his confirmation post was in any way wierd?
Too much information. Felt like he was trying hard to appear town.
It also felt like a buddying post with the joke on the end.
↑BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
I agreed with Beck's initial read for a start. PB has also continued to do nothing and my read hasn't changed in that respect.
↑BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I could vote him but it would be on the premise that he is lurking and I don't feel comfortable with that at this early stage. Sure, if his behaviour continues and nothing improves in terms of his posting frequency and the content of his posts, I'll gladly jump on that wagon.
It's almost like you're not reading.
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 4:14 am
by Aronis
I sorry. But I don't understand how you can consider me scum, when you're doing the exact same thing. Unless you're scum, then I understand.
Not Voting: no one
With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
Deadline is Monday, October 6 at 3:30 PM Eastern
Accuracy never guaranteed. But
probably
accurate.
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 5:00 am
by BlueBloodedToffee
↑Aronis wrote:I sorry. But I don't understand how you can consider me scum, when you're doing the exact same thing. Unless you're scum, then I understand.
You should look at my explanation for my votes and my thought processes following those votes which can clearly be followed.
And then you should look at yours. You will see the difference. If I have to point it out, I will.
You still haven't explained how your read on DT changed either. Or why you're voting PB.