Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 9:54 am
(expired on 2015-12-13 14:30:00)
(Sun Dec 13 @ 2:30:00 PM ET)
(Sun Dec 13 @ 2:30:00 PM ET)
Page 15 of 138
(Sun Dec 13 @ 2:30:00 PM ET)
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 10:04 am
I've just skimmed through the whole thread since my last post..
I like MarioManiac4's case against Dwlee99 in post 322
I like MarioManiac4's case against Dwlee99 in post 322
I think Titus was just messing around in 268, but I can understand why Firebringer might think otherwise and might think Titus is scum trying to get buddy with him.. What really bugs me is how Titus takes a defensive stance in 274.↑ Titus wrote:↑ Firebringer wrote:
I would, but I kinda get the feeling your buddying me.
No way you already are town reading me.
Thats insane even for you.
No it's not. But OK, you'll see I can legit read you.
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 10:04 am
Please note I updated the rules in Post #1 because I accidentally left off rules about the length of a night phase (48 hours) and about No Lynching
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 10:07 am
I think Dwlee99 is a better lynch than MarioManiac
VOTE: Dwlee99
VOTE: Dwlee99
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 10:10 am
Will catch up after MtG tourney tonight.
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 10:10 am
-facepalm-
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 10:14 am
Nah, I lied. I'm just gonna do stuff right now since I'm feeling pretty good and I want to talk about stuff.
(I'm aware dav has asked me a question but I'll answer it later.)
What about that case did you agree with, particularly? It read like a bunch of nitpicky dribble to me.
(I'm aware dav has asked me a question but I'll answer it later.)
↑ Zymf wrote:I've just skimmed through the whole thread since my last post..
I like MarioManiac4's case against Dwlee99 in post 322
I think Titus was just messing around in 268, but I can understand why Firebringer might think otherwise and might think Titus is scum trying to get buddy with him.. What really bugs me is how Titus takes a defensive stance in 274.↑ Titus wrote:↑ Firebringer wrote:
I would, but I kinda get the feeling your buddying me.
No way you already are town reading me.
Thats insane even for you.
No it's not. But OK, you'll see I can legit read you.
What about that case did you agree with, particularly? It read like a bunch of nitpicky dribble to me.
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 10:18 am
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 10:20 am
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 10:30 am
↑ Zymf wrote:I've just skimmed through the whole thread since my last post..
I like MarioManiac4's case against Dwlee99 in post 322
I think Titus was just messing around in 268, but I can understand why Firebringer might think otherwise and might think Titus is scum trying to get buddy with him.. What really bugs me is how Titus takes a defensive stance in 274.↑ Titus wrote:↑ Firebringer wrote:
I would, but I kinda get the feeling your buddying me.
No way you already are town reading me.
Thats insane even for you.
No it's not. But OK, you'll see I can legit read you.
I was saying I really liked FB. I wasn't being defensive though. *shrug* I can read FB but he's naturally paranoid of an early townread on him.
That's why I said sort me.
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 10:37 am
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 11:03 am
↑ Dwlee99 wrote:↑ Aj The Epic wrote:↑ Frozen Angel wrote:↑ Aj The Epic wrote:As for fire, it doesn't matter what he posts. My concern isn't reading people who're relatively easy to figure out.
can you say who are these people?
Fire , Dwel , ... ?
Notscience, Mario, Dave and probably Frozen Angel. Admittedly, Dave is an interesting case who I sometimes just don't care to read.
↑ Grib wrote:@AJ
That's an incredibly lazy buzzword. Do you have anything to back it up?
Besides, wine aside, I'm not in the habit of purposefully crippling my team Day 1 for towncred. I don't have a hard time getting townread on MS regardless of my alignment (save for a couple of scumgames I borked), so it wouldn't be giving me any particular advantage.
Fair enough on Firebringer.
Lazy? Nah, it's a possible explanation that justifies why we might have the same vote. Having the vote isn't what I care for: Why you have it, conviction behind it and situations when it occurs are more useful. This is why I think it's useless to go "Oh well, Gribs is voting for Mario... one of them is town".
Dwlee, have you ever caught scum as town, and if so how do you go about catching scum? Because I doubt it's via VCA.
I only have one completed town game on site and that was where I replaced in as a power role and the win was handed to me because the scum claimed something not in the matrix and the other one I had a tracker result of them killing the person. My games offsite are way too different to even compare them to this style of game. And I didn't say I'm using VCA to scum hunt, that was for reactions.
And it sees who is paying attention, mario. Tbh I don't know what I expected exactly because it is my first time trying to reaction fish like that but I didn't get anything from it other than you making it seem scummy as crap and that grib asked if it was still going to happen so I think that's a townie reaction from grib (mainly taking note of things like that and remembering them to scumhunt or whatever).
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 11:16 am
Doesn't come back?
↑ Zymf wrote:I've just skimmed through the whole thread since my last post..
I like MarioManiac4's case against Dwlee99 in post 322
I think Titus was just messing around in 268, but I can understand why Firebringer might think otherwise and might think Titus is scum trying to get buddy with him.. What really bugs me is how Titus takes a defensive stance in 274.↑ Titus wrote:↑ Firebringer wrote:
I would, but I kinda get the feeling your buddying me.
No way you already are town reading me.
Thats insane even for you.
No it's not. But OK, you'll see I can legit read you.
Why?
K
Not sure if it's scummy to have 3 posts as an ISO.
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 11:20 am
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 11:26 am
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 11:32 am
Just got back from class, I'll post my thoughts when I read through everything.
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 11:44 am
Rather than exploring the options, he forces it into a choice between Mario and Dwlee, thus making justifying his vote on Dwlee a lot easier. It's creating the idea of it being a choice between Mario or Dwlee, when it's... really not.
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 11:47 am
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 11:47 am
Because he is voting me for crap reasons. He doesn't even say what looks good about mario's case.
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 11:49 am
Dweee join me. I has cookies.
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 11:50 am
↑ Titus wrote:
He's not forcing anything though...
He is though? To himself.
I know I'm bad at explaining, but I'd have thought you'd get the gist by now.
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 11:52 am
It's a false dilemma because in his mind Zymf is making it so that either me or mario have to get lynched when there are more wagons than just me.
And I don't want to vote Davsto.
And I don't want to vote Davsto.
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 11:55 am
Nah he's just changing his mind.
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 11:55 am
No cookies for you. 
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 12:06 pm
;v