Mafiascum.net

I can normally tell when you're town and I don't townread you now
sounds like a good reason to me even if it's easy to fake as scum

Meta is a shitty reason to scumread anyone.

In post 351, PsychoticDave wrote:Meta is a shitty reason to scumread anyone.

Not if it works

In post 352, MariaR wrote:

In post 351, PsychoticDave wrote:Meta is a shitty reason to scumread anyone.

Not if it works

And what if it doesn't?
We possibly kill two Townies based on how you think someone is acting compared to another game?

In post 353, PsychoticDave wrote:

In post 352, MariaR wrote:

In post 351, PsychoticDave wrote:Meta is a shitty reason to scumread anyone.

Not if it works

And what if it doesn't?
We possibly kill two Townies based on how you thWink someone is acting compared to another game?

Well until it fails I'ma keep using it.

Ever heard the saying if it aren't broke don't fix it.

That really doesn't apply here...

DOES IT THOUGH!

In post 351, PsychoticDave wrote:Meta is a shitty reason to scumread anyone.

+1 +1 +1 +1 +1

I agree meta sucks and I hate it but you can't outright say it has no merit/value

In post 359, MariaR wrote:I agree meta sucks and I hate it but you can't outright say it has no merit/value

But you also can't say it does.

Also this is a very different setup.

In post 360, PsychoticDave wrote:

In post 359, MariaR wrote:I agree meta sucks and I hate it but you can't outright say it has no merit/value

But you also can't say it does.

I think you can.
Like pointing out something like meta to add onto a case is a legitimate argument if it's like the ONLY reason you have on someone then I understand the point.

In post 361, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also this is a very different setup.

You blaming a set up for how you act is bs
bliz mafia was a dif set up
deatnote was a dif set up
so wtf is your point

In post 363, MariaR wrote:

In post 361, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also this is a very different setup.

You blaming a set up for how you act is bs
bliz mafia was a dif set up
deatnote was a dif set up
so wtf is your point

Those were slightly different than normal.
This type of game I feel has entirely different strategies than normal mafia. It's why I discount any statements comparing my play in a game to my play in the last Lover's game I played. In that game, getting tred was easy af by just showing a real suspicion of your partner. I abused that as town but still, scum are much less likely to want to suspect their partner.

In post 364, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 363, MariaR wrote:

In post 361, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also this is a very different setup.

You blaming a set up for how you act is bs
bliz mafia was a dif set up
deatnote was a dif set up
so wtf is your point

Those were slightly different than normal.
This type of game I feel has entirely different strategies than normal mafia. It's why I discount any statements comparing my play in a game to my play in the last Lover's game I played. In that game, getting tred was easy af by just showing a real suspicion of your partner. I abused that as town but still, scum are much less likely to want to suspect their partner.

ew

We could continue to argue about meta pointlessly if you want, but I'd prefer to hear who everyone wants to be paired with and why.
I really don't care who I'm paired with as long as it isn't Vedith, but that's because I'm sure we'd get nothing done in our QT but memes.

Alright. My top pick is definitely human sequencer at this point. I'd be willing to go with Gamma too, but I think I town read Human a little more (and I feel like our styles would match up better).

Does anyone have a problem with me going with Human and Dave going with Gamma?

In post 367, DIG wrote:Does anyone have a problem with me going with Human and Dave going with Gamma?

I do

nobody cares about your opinion

yikes.

some pressing questions for sickofit:
1. why is gamma townier than vedith to you?
2. out of DIG and Psychotic, who would you prefer to lynch?
3. is there any basis to your townread on me other than my non-alignment-indicative comment about posting style?

In post 293, Parama wrote:

In post 240, Human Sequencer wrote: i'm not applying a rigid concept to the game. i'm intepreting dunn's actions in this particular game as towny, because that's how i read the motivations behind their posts
'too scummy to be scum' is doubting yourself because you're reading them as definite scum
i'm reading dunn differently than that, i've seen a few things that ping me but the feeling i get behind his posts are towny and genuine

i just feel like you're being too quick to dismiss the stuff you pointed out about dunn.

i'm not dismissing it, it's still in the thread and it's still in my mind
scumDunn is still a possibility. my read might take a complete 180 if i end up interpreting their thoughts in a different way later due to later actions.

@Dunn and Dave
pls no
i don't think a pt w/ Dave will help me sort out this game at all, i get that having two trs together is a good thing for the rest of the town but it doesn't really help me at all

i would much rather gamma be left behind than vedith, i'm unsure of vedith's alignment, but if she's town she tends to give really good analysis when she decides to pull her finger out and actually play the game

i'm not sure gamma will post much to further the game at all if they're left in, which will end up making it even harder to determine their alignment

In post 372, Human Sequencer wrote: i'm not sure gamma will post much to further the game at all if they're left in, which will end up making it even harder to determine their alignment

I think I edited the quote right.

Anyway, Gamma has been more active than you, so that doesn't make any sense. With that logic, we should leave you behind.

Lynching based on activity (and more so the possible lack of in the future) is worse than lynching for meta.
Activity is in no way AI.