Mafiascum.net

In post 343, Dunkerdoodles wrote:okok you gotta understand though, we can't just ignore what boon said, in fact we really should trust it more since he's conf town.

i'm sorting the game on my own, just using boons reads as well.

Actually we can and probably should ignore him because day 1 reads in general are useless. Especially this game because of how little content there was. You have to recognize that those were basically gut reads from rvs and early interactions and they don’t hold much weight.

In post 348, Dunkerdoodles wrote:

In post 345, Tchill13 wrote:in fact we can ignore what boon said because he was wrong about me. Since i know that i also know he was probably wrong about the other stuff. I would imagine Scum is gonna take advantage of this and push boons beliefs so they dont have to take credit for it.

see i don't think you're playing in a towny mindset. as town you need to use all the information available to try and find scum which is what im trying to do.

if you're town, show me you're town and work with me ok?

this is just false. you're voting me because of what boon said.

pushing me with reason is valid. not this.

In post 349, Chumba wrote:

In post 324, Dunkerdoodles wrote:profii is solid town for me

Why?

his posts seem well thought out and tone feels good

In post 347, profii wrote:There were more than 1 players who said Taco had a naturally scummy play style even when town, therefore scum know it could be easy to lead us to Taco lynch. Then they can pick any player who took exception to Taco and lead us there. .

Ok. So who wasn’t scum reading taco day 1, that’s pushing for his lynch day 2?

If nobody your theory is proven wrong and mine moves to a more likely scenario (and omg that’s the one that’s more likely to happen anyway)

If I’m wrong about you and you are town. I suggest you learn what Occam’s razor is.

Now I’m curious who is pushing taco today.

P.edit - well thought out posts more often come from scum. What else?

In post 354, Apple Jack wrote:

In post 347, profii wrote:There were more than 1 players who said Taco had a naturally scummy play style even when town, therefore scum know it could be easy to lead us to Taco lynch. Then they can pick any player who took exception to Taco and lead us there. .

Ok. So who wasn’t scum reading taco day 1, that’s pushing for his lynch day 2?

If nobody your theory is proven wrong and mine moves to a more likely scenario (and omg that’s the one that’s more likely to happen anyway)

If I’m wrong about you and you are town. I suggest you learn what Occam’s razor is.

Now I’m curious who is pushing taco today.

P.edit - well thought out posts more often come from scum. What else?

Mine. Smh

Ok profli. The only person who voted tacos today was me and I’ve been scum reading him since day 1. Nobody else is even pushing or attempting to vote him and I have even moved on despite still scum reading him.

So basically your theory is disproven. There was no frame job from what I can tell.

In post 350, Chumba wrote:

In post 343, Dunkerdoodles wrote:okok you gotta understand though, we can't just ignore what boon said, in fact we really should trust it more since he's conf town.

i'm sorting the game on my own, just using boons reads as well.

Actually we can and probably should ignore him because day 1 reads in general are useless. Especially this game because of how little content there was. You have to recognize that those were basically gut reads from rvs and early interactions and they don’t hold much weight.

10 pages isn't nothing. you can easily get reads from d1, there's no reason to ignore them.

In post 351, Tchill13 wrote:

In post 348, Dunkerdoodles wrote:

In post 345, Tchill13 wrote:in fact we can ignore what boon said because he was wrong about me. Since i know that i also know he was probably wrong about the other stuff. I would imagine Scum is gonna take advantage of this and push boons beliefs so they dont have to take credit for it.

see i don't think you're playing in a towny mindset. as town you need to use all the information available to try and find scum which is what im trying to do.

if you're town, show me you're town and work with me ok?

this is just false. you're voting me because of what boon said.

In post 352, Tchill13 wrote:pushing me with reason is valid. not this.

this is basically scum trying to get us to ignore valid points.
why aren't you defending yourself instead of just shutting down other's reads
like you're obvious scum now but yeah

In post 267, profii wrote:My first impression of day 2 is that everyone seems to have focussed on the boon-drama, this is a fairly natural thing to do I think but he was VT so although he appears to be a well regarded player on this site, I’m wary about considering he’s reads super locked on and wonder if the scum have used the natural drama focus to cast shade early

Let’s talk about this theory now.

Fykus and dunkers are basically sheeping boon.

Fykus did so incorrectly, was informed he did so, yet still kept his vote.

Wouldn’t these 2 people be people trying to take advantage of the boon drama?

Dunkers as far as I can tell is just straight up sheeping boon. I don’t really see him adding anything new for tchill and tchill and I share a brain about mafia and yet again we seem to agreed with each other and he didn’t even know it was me. So tchill I’m willing to say is lock town.

In post 348, Dunkerdoodles wrote:

In post 345, Tchill13 wrote:in fact we can ignore what boon said because he was wrong about me. Since i know that i also know he was probably wrong about the other stuff. I would imagine Scum is gonna take advantage of this and push boons beliefs so they dont have to take credit for it.

see i don't think you're playing in a towny mindset. as town you need to use all the information available to try and find scum which is what im trying to do.

if you're town, show me you're town and work with me ok?

whiplash

In post 357, Dunkerdoodles wrote:10 pages isn't nothing. you can easily get reads from d1, there's no reason to ignore them.

Trust me. Day 1 reads are almost always garbage. He’s probably right about 1/2 people and that’s it. You aren’t going to convince people with “but boon said”

In post 357, Dunkerdoodles wrote:this is basically scum trying to get us to ignore valid points.

What valid points have been made?

You haven’t made any

In post 358, Chumba wrote:

In post 267, profii wrote:My first impression of day 2 is that everyone seems to have focussed on the boon-drama, this is a fairly natural thing to do I think but he was VT so although he appears to be a well regarded player on this site, I’m wary about considering he’s reads super locked on and wonder if the scum have used the natural drama focus to cast shade early

Let’s talk about this theory now.

Fykus and dunkers are basically sheeping boon.

Fykus did so incorrectly, was informed he did so, yet still kept his vote.

Wouldn’t these 2 people be people trying to take advantage of the boon drama?

Dunkers as far as I can tell is just straight up sheeping boon. I don’t really see him adding anything new for tchill and tchill and I share a brain about mafia and yet again we seem to agreed with each other and he didn’t even know it was me. So tchill I’m willing to say is lock town.

Dunkers knows more than he's letting on. This is not about Boon. Going to point back to my pool of Dunkers/Fykus/Taco here. Profii being more upset about the supposed already forgone conclusion of Sergtaco's lynch than anyone that is willing to push Taco is concerning, IMO.

If that’s true I wish he approached it different. I tend to ignore boon even when he’s alive. I certainly am never going to sheep his day 1 reads after he’s dead.

Tchill feels town to me. We have the same reads so he’s either mind melding or like I said earlier buddying me.

It’s going to take way more than “but boon said” to drop a town read that I feel is solid.

In post 355, Chumba wrote:

In post 354, Apple Jack wrote:

In post 347, profii wrote:There were more than 1 players who said Taco had a naturally scummy play style even when town, therefore scum know it could be easy to lead us to Taco lynch. Then they can pick any player who took exception to Taco and lead us there. .

Ok. So who wasn’t scum reading taco day 1, that’s pushing for his lynch day 2?

If nobody your theory is proven wrong and mine moves to a more likely scenario (and omg that’s the one that’s more likely to happen anyway)

If I’m wrong about you and you are town. I suggest you learn what Occam’s razor is.

Now I’m curious who is pushing taco today.

P.edit - well thought out posts more often come from scum. What else?

Mine. Smh

oh you're derpy
lol

In post 358, Chumba wrote:

In post 267, profii wrote:My first impression of day 2 is that everyone seems to have focussed on the boon-drama, this is a fairly natural thing to do I think but he was VT so although he appears to be a well regarded player on this site, I’m wary about considering he’s reads super locked on and wonder if the scum have used the natural drama focus to cast shade early

Let’s talk about this theory now.

Fykus and dunkers are basically sheeping boon.

Fykus did so incorrectly, was informed he did so, yet still kept his vote.

Wouldn’t these 2 people be people trying to take advantage of the boon drama?

Dunkers as far as I can tell is just straight up sheeping boon. I don’t really see him adding anything new for tchill and tchill and I share a brain about mafia and yet again we seem to agreed with each other and he didn’t even know it was me. So tchill I’m willing to say is lock town.

this is s/s it's so obvious too

Nah I’m not scum and I’m debunking all this weird theories. Though if you think he’s scum also. Vote him with me.

And yes I’m Derpy. Working on a new style.

Wait. You just said profli was town and now you learn I’m somebody else and all of a sudden profli is scum?

How’s that happen?

In post 361, Chumba wrote:

In post 357, Dunkerdoodles wrote:this is basically scum trying to get us to ignore valid points.

What valid points have been made?

You haven’t made any

instead of defending himself all tchill's saying is "boon's wrong and no one should sheep him cause he's wrong"

from a scum perspective, tchill basically has to brute force his way out like this or he's getting lynched.

maybe my words are coming out weird but i should be making sense here

pedit: i will say i like the new style a lot more

pedit 2: i didn't say that?

In post 365, Dunkerdoodles wrote:

In post 358, Chumba wrote:

In post 267, profii wrote:My first impression of day 2 is that everyone seems to have focussed on the boon-drama, this is a fairly natural thing to do I think but he was VT so although he appears to be a well regarded player on this site, I’m wary about considering he’s reads super locked on and wonder if the scum have used the natural drama focus to cast shade early

Let’s talk about this theory now.

Fykus and dunkers are basically sheeping boon.

Fykus did so incorrectly, was informed he did so, yet still kept his vote.

Wouldn’t these 2 people be people trying to take advantage of the boon drama?

Dunkers as far as I can tell is just straight up sheeping boon. I don’t really see him adding anything new for tchill and tchill and I share a brain about mafia and yet again we seem to agreed with each other and he didn’t even know it was me. So tchill I’m willing to say is lock town.

this is s/s it's so obvious too

sorry was talking about you/derpy being s/s

In post 369, Dunkerdoodles wrote:

In post 365, Dunkerdoodles wrote:

In post 358, Chumba wrote:

In post 267, profii wrote:My first impression of day 2 is that everyone seems to have focussed on the boon-drama, this is a fairly natural thing to do I think but he was VT so although he appears to be a well regarded player on this site, I’m wary about considering he’s reads super locked on and wonder if the scum have used the natural drama focus to cast shade early

Let’s talk about this theory now.

Fykus and dunkers are basically sheeping boon.

Fykus did so incorrectly, was informed he did so, yet still kept his vote.

Wouldn’t these 2 people be people trying to take advantage of the boon drama?

Dunkers as far as I can tell is just straight up sheeping boon. I don’t really see him adding anything new for tchill and tchill and I share a brain about mafia and yet again we seem to agreed with each other and he didn’t even know it was me. So tchill I’m willing to say is lock town.

this is s/s it's so obvious too

sorry was talking about you/derpy being s/s

*you/tchill ugh*

In post 368, Dunkerdoodles wrote:pedit 2: i didn't say that?

You quoted a post of me and profli and said it was s/s interaction.

So yes you did

In post 365, Dunkerdoodles wrote:

In post 358, Chumba wrote:

In post 267, profii wrote:My first impression of day 2 is that everyone seems to have focussed on the boon-drama, this is a fairly natural thing to do I think but he was VT so although he appears to be a well regarded player on this site, I’m wary about considering he’s reads super locked on and wonder if the scum have used the natural drama focus to cast shade early

Let’s talk about this theory now.

Fykus and dunkers are basically sheeping boon.

Fykus did so incorrectly, was informed he did so, yet still kept his vote.

Wouldn’t these 2 people be people trying to take advantage of the boon drama?

Dunkers as far as I can tell is just straight up sheeping boon. I don’t really see him adding anything new for tchill and tchill and I share a brain about mafia and yet again we seem to agreed with each other and he didn’t even know it was me. So tchill I’m willing to say is lock town.

this is s/s it's so obvious too

this is the part i think is s/s
not the profii stuff lol

oh lol. Yeah no. Tchill and I just share a brain. Last couple of games we’ve played we had near identical thoughts. He’s made much better posts and his reads make more sense. Sadly you haven’t provided anything useful and I just can’t really trust you atm since you are sheeping a dead guy’s day 1 reads.

I mean tchill could be scum but right now he looks like town and unfortunately you don’t. But you never do to me so I’m leaving you alone for the moment. I hope you do something to change my read soon.