Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 11:19 am
So many nudists this game.
I don't like you sheeping a bad read with poor reasoning on someone that's unlikely to be scum to begin with. are you wolfreading quick at all?In post 346, CheekyTeeky wrote:Explain Tor. How is my vote onto the wagon scummy?In post 340, Toranaga wrote:or cheeky, yesIn post 337, Creature wrote:like Srceenplay?In post 332, Toranaga wrote:that wagon is so bad I'm almost sure there's a couple of scum at least in itIn post 323, Creature wrote:and most of the Quick wagonersIn post 319, Nero Cain wrote:this is just a general statement about how I feel about MS play. In this game it could maybe fit for Creature and Quick.
Are you even reading? Try again.In post 352, Toranaga wrote:I don't like you sheeping a bad read with poor reasoning on someone that's unlikely to be scum to begin with. are you wolfreading quick at all?In post 346, CheekyTeeky wrote:Explain Tor. How is my vote onto the wagon scummy?In post 340, Toranaga wrote:or cheeky, yesIn post 337, Creature wrote:like Srceenplay?In post 332, Toranaga wrote:that wagon is so bad I'm almost sure there's a couple of scum at least in itIn post 323, Creature wrote:and most of the Quick wagonersIn post 319, Nero Cain wrote:this is just a general statement about how I feel about MS play. In this game it could maybe fit for Creature and Quick.
disagree with quick being over defensive if that was the whole reason for your voteIn post 357, CheekyTeeky wrote:Sorry for the massive quote...
You say when you “was town”. That reads to me that you aren’t this game but ar aware enough to try and make yourself seem that you are. It reads fake.In post 334, Quick wrote:Why is that? You don't think Beeboy looks bad at all because of that? Is it Scummy of me to defend myself in this manner? Why is it Scummy? I pointed out a fact, not a speculation.In post 330, Srceenplay wrote:This post seals them as scum for me.In post 182, Quick wrote:You saw me do the exact same thing before when I was Town so I'm really not sure why you have a problem with it???In post 178, beeboy wrote:I mean whats the reason for your vote then?In post 155, Quick wrote:Not at all. I'm not reading through that shit.
And why are you choosing to just ignore all this games content and just complaining about the lack of it.
I voted who I thought was the "leader" of the Scum faction.
Happy to lynch you tomorrow
You can just stop.
That's fine you can disagree. But I'm trying to point out that you're not being objective. You are pinged by me which seems to happen in every game we're in where we're not in a hydra, and you call out my vote as scummy when you clearly didn't even assess my intent in hopping on Quick. I am trying to sort players, jumping on quick when he felt I was defensive got further info for me and then a number of votes slid on after me with only Beeboy making any sense.In post 358, Toranaga wrote:disagree with quick being over defensive if that was the whole reason for your voteIn post 357, CheekyTeeky wrote:Sorry for the massive quote...
Have you played with Toranaga b4?In post 362, CheekyTeeky wrote:I'm getting frustrated because I want to work with you and I don't think this is how you approach me as scum, so you're probably just being derpy town.
Um yes? Lol how would that make any sense if I hadn't?In post 364, Nero Cain wrote:Have you played with Toranaga b4?In post 362, CheekyTeeky wrote:I'm getting frustrated because I want to work with you and I don't think this is how you approach me as scum, so you're probably just being derpy town.
calm down :/ I'm not interested in communicating all that much right now. I think you're town since I re-read your ISO and I think this last post is almost exclusively something you write as town, but there's no reason to be frustrated with me. there are very few elements ITT for me to read people either way confidently. we build as we go yes?In post 362, CheekyTeeky wrote:That's fine you can disagree. But I'm trying to point out that you're not being objective. You are pinged by me which seems to happen in every game we're in where we're not in a hydra, and you call out my vote as scummy when you clearly didn't even assess my intent in hopping on Quick. I am trying to sort players, jumping on quick when he felt I was defensive got further info for me and then a number of votes slid on after me with only Beeboy making any sense.In post 358, Toranaga wrote:disagree with quick being over defensive if that was the whole reason for your voteIn post 357, CheekyTeeky wrote:Sorry for the massive quote...
I'm getting frustrated because I want to work with you and I don't think this is how you approach me as scum, so you're probably just being derpy town.
just making sure.In post 365, CheekyTeeky wrote:Um yes? Lol how would that make any sense if I hadn't?In post 364, Nero Cain wrote:Have you played with Toranaga b4?In post 362, CheekyTeeky wrote:I'm getting frustrated because I want to work with you and I don't think this is how you approach me as scum, so you're probably just being derpy town.
but that's not really scummy?In post 201, Hopkirk wrote:How did you read it as 'this slot is confirmed scum' without thinking it was weird that nobody else was voting it/talking about it Quick?
So bad... so so bad.In post 359, Srceenplay wrote:You say when you “was town”. That reads to me that you aren’t this game but ar aware enough to try and make yourself seem that you are. It reads fake.In post 334, Quick wrote:Why is that? You don't think Beeboy looks bad at all because of that? Is it Scummy of me to defend myself in this manner? Why is it Scummy? I pointed out a fact, not a speculation.In post 330, Srceenplay wrote:This post seals them as scum for me.In post 182, Quick wrote:You saw me do the exact same thing before when I was Town so I'm really not sure why you have a problem with it???In post 178, beeboy wrote:I mean whats the reason for your vote then?In post 155, Quick wrote:Not at all. I'm not reading through that shit.
And why are you choosing to just ignore all this games content and just complaining about the lack of it.
I voted who I thought was the "leader" of the Scum faction.
I don’t get what beeboy is arguing. I just see it as forcing content and to me it looks like it worked.
Oh, I didn't see that question by Hopkirk... To answer, what else could I conclude about the Mafia Gunner Slot?In post 369, Spiffeh wrote:The only thing odd about Quick is that he's refusing to answer this very simple question:but that's not really scummy?In post 201, Hopkirk wrote:How did you read it as 'this slot is confirmed scum' without thinking it was weird that nobody else was voting it/talking about it Quick?
Quick behaving weirdly and not being overly helpful isn't alignment indicative as far as I remember (although idk the last time I played with him)
And he continues to double down that he's doing nothing wrong despite the pressure which kinda reads more like stubborn town to me than scum
It's pretty obvious to me from the context of his first post that it was a serious voteIn post 238, beeboy wrote:And later says he is serious with his troll vote.
Which is the same troll vote I did in my opening post so I have trouble with him not seeing it.
It was based on a tinfoil hat theory I had about the setup that I will not go into. But thanks for the discredit anyways. At least I know you are encouraging people not trusting my reads.In post 372, Spiffeh wrote:It's pretty obvious to me from the context of his first post that it was a serious voteIn post 238, beeboy wrote:And later says he is serious with his troll vote.
Which is the same troll vote I did in my opening post so I have trouble with him not seeing it.
Not all that intelligent, but serious
I think this is the part Spiffeh thinks your avoiding.In post 201, Hopkirk wrote:without thinking it was weird that nobody else was voting it/talking about it Quick?